Abstract
Background
COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted urgent need for effective training in pandemic and outbreak management among healthcare professionals. Traditional teaching methods often lack the engagement required to prepare learners for real-world challenges. This systematic review evaluates effectiveness of gamification-based teaching methods in enhancing knowledge, skills, and engagement in pandemic preparedness education for healthcare professionals and students.
Methods
Systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases, identifying studies that employed gamification-based learning for pandemic management training. Studies were screened and selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on interventions targeting healthcare professionals or students. 12 studies were included, and narrative synthesis was conducted due to the heterogeneity in study designs, participant groups, and outcome measures.
Results
Review found that gamification-based methods, such as serious games, e-learning modules, and simulations, improved knowledge retention, practical skills, and learner engagement compared to traditional teaching approaches. Participants reported high satisfaction and perceived usefulness of gamified interventions, with several studies demonstrating significant improvements in long-term knowledge retention and willingness to change behaviours related to infection control. However, variability in intervention design and outcome measures posed challenges for drawing generalized conclusions.
Conclusion
Gamification-based teaching methods show promise in enhancing pandemic preparedness training among healthcare professionals. While these methods improve engagement and learning outcomes, further research is needed to explore long-term impacts, cost-effectiveness, and applicability in diverse educational settings. In addition, heterogeneity and methodological limitations of included studies underscore the need for more rigorous, high-quality research to validate these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
