The case example reports on the development and first experiences with a simulation game called WORK-A-ROUND. The game has been developed during a research project focusing the future integration of mobile work into classical work environments based on physical office spaces. WORK-A-ROUND focuses the simulation of distributed work scenarios and is meant to be used within the context of participatory workplace design and strategic planning for distributed work. First observations have shown that the game is well adopted by the participants and its low-hierarchy and team-oriented program seems to facilitate the negotiation of open scenarios in cross-disciplinary stakeholder groups. A two-step debriefing process further aims at the transfer of the game’s results and cooperative learnings towards strategic recommendations for the player’s real work life and the future design of workplaces.
AmstutzS.SchwehrP. (2014). Human office. Zürich, Switzerland: vdf Hochschulverlag AG Zürich.
2.
AmstutzS.SchwehrP.SchulzeH.KrömkerH. (2013). Office in motion. Arbeitswelten für die Wissensarbeitenden von morgen [Office in motion. Workspaces for the Knowledge Workers of tomorrow]. Lucerne, Switzerland: Competence Center Typology & Planning in Architecture, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts.
3.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.
4.
BrandtE. (2006). Designing exploratory design games: A framework for participation in participatory design? In Proceedings Participatory Design Conference (pp. 57-66). New York: ACM.
5.
BrandtE.MesseterJ. (2004). Facilitating collaboration through design games. In Proceedings Participatory Design Conference 2004 (pp. 121-131). New York: ACM.
6.
De BruyneE.De JongA. (2008, July14-17). The workplace game: Exploring end users’ new behaviour. In Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2008, Las Vegas, NV.
7.
De JongA.De BruyneE. (2008). Participatory design of office spaces by game playing? In Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2008. Las Vegas, NV.
8.
De JongA.KouprieM.De BruyneE. (2009). Effects of the workplace game: A case-study into anticipating future behavior of office workers. In KarshB.-T. (Ed.), Ergonomics and health aspects, HCII 2009 (pp. 3-12). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
9.
FriedJ.HanssonD. H. (2013). REMOTE: Office not required, crown business (1st ed.). New York, NY: Crown Business.
HannulaO.IrrmannO.SmedsR. (2014). Modeling knowledge co-creation games as activity systems. In Proceedings of the 45th Conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association (pp. 186-198), Dornbirn, Austria.
12.
JohanssonM.LindeP. (2005). Playful collaboration exploration: New research practice in participatory design. Journal of Research Practice, 1(1), Article M5.
13.
KlabbersJ. H. G. (2006). A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 37, 155-173.
14.
KleinG. (1998). Sources of power. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 40, 297-327. doi:10.1177/1046878108325713
16.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
17.
KrizW. C. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34, 495-511. doi:10.1177/1046878103258201
18.
KrizW. C. (2008). A systemic-constructivist approach to the facilitation and debriefing of simulations and games. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 41, 663-680. doi:10.1177/1046878108319867
19.
KrizW. C.NöbauerB. (2002). Debriefing von Planspielen. In BlötzU.BonnB. f. B. B. (Eds.), Planspiele in der beruflichen Bildung [Simulation games in vocational education] Bielefeld, Germany: Bertelsmann.
20.
PearceC. (2006). Games AS art: The aesthetics of play. Visible Language, 40(1), 66-89.
VaajakallioK.MattelmäkiT. (2014). Design games in codesign: As a tool, a mindset and a structure. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 10, 63-77.
23.
WagemannR. (1999). So haben sich selbst steuernde Teams Erfolg [The way to success for self led Teams]. Organsiationsentwicklung [Organisational Development], 1, 44-55.
