Employing Moscovici’s behavioral style model of social influence, this study viewed social influence as rooted in conflict and sought to determine the impact an opinion deviate’s use of evidence and linguistic style might have on majority opinion and perceptions. The study also added an external status characteristic to Moscovici’s model by examining the impact of the opinion deviate’s gender on measures of influence and interpersonal attractiveness. Findings revealed that opinion deviates exerted little influence on expressed majority opinions, regardless of how they communicated and regardless of their gender. However, using evidence to support arguments while employing few qualifying expressions (tag questions and disclaimers) appeared to increase an opinion deviate’s interpersonal attractiveness in the eyes of the majority. Predictions related to the deviate’s gender received mixed support. The potential gender bias of the discussion topic and its subsequent impact on the study’s findings were explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, V. L. , & Wilder, D. A. (1980). Impact of group consensus and social support on stimulus meaning: Mediation of conformity by cognitive restructuring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1116-1124.
2.
Andrews, P. H. , & Baird, J. E., Jr. (1995). Communication for business and the professions (6th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
3.
Aronson, E. , Turner, J. A., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 31-36.
4.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.
5.
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies on independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Review, 70(9).
6.
Berlyne, D. E. (1968). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 413-484). New York: Random House.
8.
Bradley, P. H. (1978). Pressure for uniformity: An experimental study of deviate responses in group discussions of policy. Small Group Behavior, 9, 149-160.
9.
Bradley, P. H. (1980). Sex, competence, and opinion deviation: An expectation states approach. Communication Monographs, 47, 101-110.
10.
Bradley, P. H. (1981). The folk-linguistics of women’s speech: An empirical examination. Communication Monographs, 48, 73-90.
11.
Bradley, P. H. , Hamon, C. M. & Harris, A. M. (1976). Dissent in small groups. Journal of Communication, 26(4), 155-159.
12.
Bray, R. M. , Johnson, D., & Chilstrom, J. T. (1982). Social influence by group members with minority opinions: A comparison of Hollander and Moscovici. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 78-88.
13.
Brehm, J. W. , & Festinger, L. (1957). Pressures toward uniformity of performance in groups. Human Relations, 10, 85-89.
14.
Buzzanell, P. (1995). Reframing the glass ceiling as a socially constructed process: Implications for understanding and change. Communication Monographs, 62, 327-354.
15.
Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. The American Psychologist, 10, 191-198.
16.
Davis, D. (1982). Determinants of responsiveness in dyadic interaction. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.)., Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 85-139). New York: Springer-Verlag.
17.
Deutsch, M. , & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
18.
Dubois, B. , & Crouch, I (1975). The question of tag questions in women’s speech: They don’t really use more of them, do they?Language in Society, 4, 289-294.
19.
Erickson, B. , Lind, E. A., Johnson, B. C., & O’Barr, W. M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279.
20.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
21.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
22.
Gouran, D. S. , & Andrews, P. H. (1984). Determinants of punitive responses to socially proscribed behavior: Seriousness, attribution of responsibility, and status of offender. Small Group Behavior, 15, 524-544.
23.
Hoffman, L. , Harbury, E., & Maier, N. (1962). Differences and disagreement as factors in creative group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 213-216.
24.
Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
25.
Hovland, C. I. , & Weiss, W. (1952). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
26.
Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
Kelman, H. C. , & Hovland, C. I. (1953). “Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 326-335.
28.
Key, M. R. (1975). Male/female language. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
29.
Kiesler, C. A. , & Pallak, M. S. (1975). Minority influence: The effect of majority reactionaries and defectors, and minority and majority compromises, upon majority opinion and attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 237-256.
30.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
31.
Kramarae, C. (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
33.
Levine, J. M. , & Ranelli, C. J. (1978). Majority reaction to shifting and stable attitudinal deviates. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 55-70.
34.
Maass, A. , & Clark, R. D., III. (1982, September). Minority influence theory: Is it applicable only to majorities? Paper presented at the 33rd Congress of the German Psychological Association, Mainz, West Germany.
35.
Maass, A. , & Clark, R. D., III. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
36.
McCroskey, J. C. (1969). A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 55, 169-176.
37.
McCroskey, J. C. (1997). An introduction to rhetorical communication (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
McCroskey, J. C. , & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261-266.
39.
McMillan, L. R. , Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D., & Gale, W. S. (1977). Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality. Sex Roles, 3, 545-559.
40.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
41.
Moscovici, S. , & Faucheux, C. (1972). Social influence, conformity bias, and the study of active minorities. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 150-202). New York: Academic Press.
42.
Moscovici, S. , Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-380.
43.
Moscovici, S. , & Nemeth, C. (1974). Social influence: II. Minority influence. In C. Nemeth (Ed.), Social psychology: Classic and contemporary integrations (pp. 217-249). Chicago: Rand McNally.
44.
Nemeth, C. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45-55.
45.
Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
46.
Nemeth, C. , & Wachtler, J. (1974). Creating the perceptions of consistency and confidence: A necessary condition for minority influence. Sociometry, 37, 529-540.
47.
Pearson, J. C. , Turner, L. H., & Todd-Mancillas, W. (1994). Gender and communication (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
48.
Ross, L. , Bierbrauer, G., & Hoffman, S. (1976). The role of attribution processes in conformity and dissent: Revisiting the Asch situation. American Psychologist, 31, 148-157.
49.
Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
50.
Seibold, D. R. , Meyers, R. A., & Sunwolf. (1996). Communication and influence in group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 242-268). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27, 1-60.
52.
Smith, K. (1994, December 31). Women minorities in management up. Bloomington Herald-Times, p. C10.
53.
Taylor, K. P. (1969). An investigation of majority verbal behavior toward opinions of deviant members in group discussions of policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
54.
Thameling, C. L. (1993, November). Effective minority influence in small group discussions. Paper presented at the Seventy-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami, FL.
55.
Thameling, C. L. , & Andrews, P. H. (1992). Majority responses to opinion deviates: A communicative analysis. Small Group Research, 23, 475-502.
56.
Wahrman, R. (1972). Status, deviance, and sanctions: A critical review. Comparative Group Studies, 3, 203-224.
57.
Wahrman, R. , & Pugh, M. D. (1974). Sex, nonconformity, and influence. Sociometry, 37, 137-147.
58.
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
Yarnold, P. R. , Grimm, L. G., & Mueser, K. T. (1986). Social conformity and the type A behavior pattern. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 99-104.
60.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1985). Psychology and life (12th ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
