Prior research has examined the use of team charters for improving teamwork in student project teams. While existing studies have examined the implementation of team charters at the time a team is formed, we find that revising charters mid-semester, plus the inclusion of feedback and coaching, results in significant increases in team commitment, team satisfaction, and individual effectiveness over the use of a one-time charter. In addition to making important contributions to theory and practice, this study highlights the need for future research to consider the various mechanisms that are activated by the charter process.
AaronJ. R.McDowellW. C.HerdmanA. O. (2014). The effects of a team charter on student team behaviors. Journal of Education for Business, 89(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2013.763753
2.
AnglinA. H.KincaidP. A.ShortJ. C.AllenD. G. (2022). Role theory perspectives: Past, present, and future applications of role theories in management research. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1469–1502. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221081442
3.
AnsonR.GoodmanJ. A. (2014). A peer assessment system to improve student team experiences. Journal of Education for Business, 89(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.754735
4.
AritzetaA.SwailesS.SeniorB. (2007). Belbin’s team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00666.x
5.
ArthurJ. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.2307/256705
6.
BaconD. R.StewartK. A.SilverW. S. (2019). Republication of “Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference”. Journal of Management Education, 45(3), 550–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919838523
7.
BarronB. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0904_2
8.
BatistaE. (2015). Introduction: Why coach? In HBR guide to coaching employees (pp.xi–xvi). Harvard Business Review Press.
9.
BedwellW. L.FioreS. M.SalasE. (2014). Developing the future workforce: An approach for integrating interpersonal skills into the MBA classroom. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0138
BlauG.PetrucciT.RiveraM. (2018). Correlates of state goal orientation for an MBA team project using a real-time performance feedback mobile application. Journal of Education for Business, 93(4), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1439875
BreugstN.PatzeltH.ShepherdD. A.AguinisH. (2012). Relationship conflict improves team performance assessment accuracy: Evidence from a multilevel study. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0032
14.
BrownR. P.VargheseL.SullivanS.ParsonsS. (2021). The impact of professional coaching on emerging leaders. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 19(2), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.24384/m3az-y271
15.
CardinalL. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119
16.
CarsonJ. B.TeslukP. E.MarroneJ. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159921
17.
ChenG.DonahueL. M.KlimoskiR. J. (2004). Training undergraduates to work in organizational teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2004.12436817
18.
ChenJ.VashdiD. R.FanQ.BambergerP. A.ChenG. (2025). The relative effects of design thinking versus after-action review on team performance: An experiential/episodic team learning perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001277
19.
ChownJ.InoueC. (2025). Peer influence in the workplace: The moderating role of task structures within organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 70(2), 538–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392251321843
CourtrightS. H.McCormickB. W.MistryS.WangJ. (2017). Quality charters or quality members? A control theory perspective on team charters and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1462–1470. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000229
22.
CoxP. L.BobrowskiP. E. (2016). The team charter assignment: Improving the effectiveness of classroom teams. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 1(2), 93–108.
23.
CrawfordE. R.LePineJ. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0206
24.
DeRueD. S.BarnesC. M.MorgesonF. P. (2010). Understanding the motivational contingencies of team leadership. Small Group Research, 41(5), 621–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410373808
25.
DoniaM. B. L.O’NeillT. A.BrutusS. (2018). The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.012
26.
EarleyP. C.NorthcraftG. B.LeeC.LituchyT. R. (1990). Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/256353
27.
EdmondsonA. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
28.
EdmondsonA. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386
29.
EisenbergJ.GliksonE.LisakA. (2021). Multicultural virtual team performance: The impact of media choice and language diversity. Small Group Research, 52(5), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420985614
30.
FioreS. M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity as teamwork. How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39(3), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317797
31.
FlamholtzE. (1979). Organizational control systems as a managerial tool. California Management Review, 22(2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165320
32.
GabelicaC.BosscheP. V. D.SegersM.GijselaersW. (2012). Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: A review. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.003
33.
GarausC.FurtmüllerG.GüttelW. H. (2016). The hidden power of small rewards: The effects of insufficient external rewards on autonomous motivation to learn. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 15(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0284
34.
GersickC. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41. https://doi.org/10.5465/256496
35.
GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T.BergielE. B. (2013). Virtual team effectiveness: An experiential activity. Small Group Research, 44(4), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488216
36.
HackmanJ. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business School Publishing.
HayA.Samra-FredericksD. (2019). Bringing the heart and soul back in: Collaborative inquiry and the DBA. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 18(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0020
40.
HinszV. B.TindaleR. S.VollrathD. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
41.
HoeverI. J.ZhouJ.van KnippenbergD. (2018). Different strokes for different teams: The contingent effects of positive and negative feedback on the creativity of informationally homogeneous and diverse teams. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2159–2181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0642
42.
HunsakerP.PavettC.HunsakerJ. (2011). Increasing student-learning team effectiveness with team charters. Journal of Education for Business, 86(3), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.489588
43.
IlgenD. R.MitchellT. R.FredricksonJ. W. (1981). Poor performers: Supervisors’ and subordinates’ responses. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(3), 386–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(81)90030-1
44.
JassawallaA.SashittalH.SashittalA. (2009). Students’ perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2009.37012178
45.
JavalagiA. A.Harris-WatsonA. M.DeChurchL. A. (2024). Zooming in and zoning out: Remote deliberation impairs team decision quality. Group & Organization Management, 49(5), 1071–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011231169590
46.
JohnsonW. H. A.BakerD. S.DongL.TarasV.WankelC. (2022). Do team charters help team-based projects? The effects of team charters on performance and satisfaction in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 21(2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0332
47.
KahnR. L.WolfeD. M.QuinnR. P.SnoekJ. D.RosenthalR. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. John Wiley & Sons.
48.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (Eds.). (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
49.
KidderD. L.Bowes-SperryL. (2012). Examining the influence of team project design decisions on student perceptions and evaluations of instructors. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0040
50.
KukenbergerM. R.MathieuJ. E.RuddyT. (2015). A cross-level test of empowerment and process influences on members’ informal learning and team commitment. Journal of Management, 41(3), 987–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312443559
51.
LarsonL. E.Harris-WatsonA. M.CarterD. R.AsencioR.DeChurchL. A.KanferR.ZaccaroS. J. (2023). Staying apart to work better together: Team structure in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Discoveries, 9(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2020.0238
52.
LePineJ. A.PiccoloR. F.JacksonC. L.MathieuJ. E.SaulJ. R. (2008). A Meta-Analysis of Teamwork Processes: Tests of A multidimensional model and relationships with Team Effectiveness Criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
53.
LepistöT.HyttiU. (2021). Developing an executive learning community: Focus on collective creation. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 20(4), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0338
54.
LoignonA. C.WoehrD. J.ThomasJ. S.LoughryM. L.OhlandM. W.FergusonD. M. (2017). Facilitating peer evaluation in team contexts: The impact of frame-of-reference rater training. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(4), 562–578. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2016.0163
55.
LoveH. B.CrossJ. E.FosdickB. K.TofanyE.DickmannE. M. (2023). Teaching team science: The key to addressing 21st century global challenges. Small Group Research, 54(3), 396–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964221121349
56.
LucianoM. M.LeslieJ. B.MathieuJ. E.HooleE. R.AndersonR.FentersV. W. (2025). Improving virtual team collaboration paradox management: A field experiment. Organization Science, 36(1), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17952
57.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/259182
58.
MaślikowskaM.GibbertM. (2023). Dynamic boundaries in virtual student teams: Is participant alignment the new team cohesion?Academy of Management Learning and Education, 22(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0524
59.
MathieuJ. E.HollenbeckJ. R.van KnippenbergD.IlgenD. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000128
60.
MathieuJ. E.LucianoM. M.D’InnocenzoL.KlockE. A.LePineJ. A. (2019). Development and psychometric evaluation of a safety climate scale for vineyards. Organizational Research Methods, 172(3), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.03.007
61.
MathieuJ. E.RappT. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013257
62.
MathieuJ. E.TannenbaumS. I.KukenbergerM. R.DonsbachJ. S.AlligerG. M. (2015). Team role experience and orientation: A measure and tests of construct validity. Group & Organization Management, 40(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114562000
63.
MaynardM. T.MathieuJ. E.RappT. L.GilsonL. L.KleinerC. (2021). Team leader coaching intervention: An investigation of the impact on team processes and performance within a surgical context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), 1080–1092. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000814
64.
MayoA. T. (2022). Syncing up: A process model of emergent interdependence in dynamic teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(3), 821–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392221096451
65.
MichelJ. W.LuvisonD. (2025). Development and validation of the individual teamwork behaviors questionnaire. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 28(2), 443–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241267986
66.
MosesJ.ThamJ. (2022). Like the idea of writing to learn but don’t like the idea of grading papers? Take these new directions in collaborative writing [Paper Session]. IEEE International Professional Communication (ProComm) Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/procomm53155.2022.00094
67.
MüllerA.BellhäuserH.KonertJ.RöpkeR. (2022). Effects of group formation on student satisfaction and performance: A field experiment. Small Group Research, 53(2), 244–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420988592
68.
NortonW. I.SussmanL. (2009). Team charters: Theoretical foundations and practical implications for quality and performance. Quality Management Journal, 16(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2009.11918214
69.
OhlandM. W.LoughryM. L.WoehrD. J.BullardL. G.FelderR. M.FinelliC. J.LaytonR. A.PomeranzH. R.SchmuckerD. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self- and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(4), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0177
70.
OldhamG. R.HackmanJ. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2/3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.678
71.
O’DonovanB. (2017). How student beliefs about knowledge and knowing influence their satisfaction with assessment and feedback. Higher Education, 74(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0068-y
72.
O’NeillT. A.HoffartG. C.McLarnonM. M. J. W.WoodleyH. J.EggermontM.RosehartW.BrennanR. (2017). Constructive controversy and reflexivity training promotes effective conflict profiles and team functioning in student learning teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0183
73.
ParkG.DeshonR. P. (2010). A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 824–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019939
74.
PastorJ.-C.BaruffaldiL. (2021). The role of regulatory focus on a peer-feedback process: A longitudinal study with MBA students. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 20(4), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0260
75.
Pertegal-FelicesM. L.Fuster-GuilloA.Rico-SoliveresM. L.Azorin-LopezJ.Jimeno-MorenillaA. (2019). Practical method of improving the teamwork of engineering students using team contracts to minimize conflict situations. IEEE Access, 7, 65083–65092. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2916343
76.
PetkovaA. P.DomingoM. A.LammE. (2021). Let’s be frank: Individual and team-level predictors of improvement in student teamwork effectiveness following peer-evaluation feedback. International Journal of Management in Education, 19(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100538
RappT. L.MathieuJ. E. (2007). Evaluating an individually self-administered generic teamwork skills training program across time and levels. Small Group Research, 38(4), 532–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407300479
79.
RiebeL.GirardiA.WhitsedC. (2016). A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education. Small Group Research, 47(6), 619–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416665221
80.
RoethlisbergerF. J.DicksonW. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Harvard University Press.
81.
RusticusS. A.JustusB. J. (2019). Comparing student- and teacher-formed teams on group dynamics, satisfaction, and performance. Small Group Research, 50(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419854520
82.
SchippersM. C. (2014). Social loafing tendencies and team performance: The compensating effect of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0191
83.
SnellS. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 292–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/256375
84.
StewartG. L.FulmerI. S.BarrickM. R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00480.x
85.
SutherlandD.WarwickP.AndersonJ.LearmonthM. (2018). How do quality of teaching, assessment, and feedback drive undergraduate course satisfaction in U.K. Business schools? A comparative analysis with nonbusiness school courses using the U.K. National Student Survey. Journal of Management Education, 42(5), 618–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918787849
86.
SverdrupT. E.ScheiV. (2015). “Cut me some slack”: The psychological contracts as a foundation for understanding team charters. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(4), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314566075
87.
ThompsonL. L. (Ed.). (2016). Making the team: A guide for managers (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
88.
Van Der VegtG.Van de VliertE. (2000). Team members’ affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management, 26(4), 633–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00050-7
89.
Van der VegtG. S.de JongS. B.BundersonJ. S.MollemanE. (2010). Power asymmetry and learning in teams: The moderating role of performance feedback. Organization Science, 21(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0452
WagemanR. (2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.559.10094
92.
WeickK. E.RobertsK. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393372
93.
Why Feedback Matters. (2014). Giving effective feedback (pp. 3–9). Harvard Business School Publishing.
94.
WildmanJ. L.BedwellW. L. (2013). Practicing what we preach: Teaching teams using validated team science. Small Group Research, 44(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413486938
95.
WildmanJ. L.NguyenD. M.DuongN. S.WarrenC. (2021). Student teamwork during COVID-19: Challenges, changes, and consequences. Small Group Research, 52(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420985185
WrightP. M.EssmanS. M. (2021). Carrots, sticks, and performance: Is it commitment, or commitment plus control?Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0064
98.
XuX.ZhaoP.HayesR.LeN.DormannC. (2023). Revisit the causal inference between organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis disentangling its sources of inconsistencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(7), 1244–1261. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001073
99.
YuklG.TraceyJ. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.77.4.525
