The purpose of this descriptive field study was to explore the processes associated with the emergence of informul member leaders in a temporary system contatinig formal leaders. Four individuals were identified by theirpeers as member leaders during a Group Relations Conference. The verbal behaviors of the 4 member leaders were traced throughout the conference and compared with those of their nonmember peers. Discriminant analyses revealed a number of differences in the interaction patterns of memberleaders and nonleaders. The findigs suggested that member leaders in a system containing formal leaders opposed the formal leaders and task The study concluded that research on the leadership function in groups and organizations should be expanded to investigate the role of member leaders in creating culture, directing activities, and influencing system outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Bales, R F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3.
Bales, R. F. , & Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction (pp. 259-306). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stodgill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
5.
Bennis, W. G. , & Shepard, H. (1956). Atheory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415-437.
6.
Blake, R. , &Mouton, J. S. (1969). Buildingadynamic corporationthrough grid organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Borgatta, E. F. , Bales, R F., & Couch, A. S. (1954). Some findings relevant to the great man theory of leadership. American Sociological Review, 19, 755-759.
8.
Burke, P. J. (1974). Participation and leadership in small groups. American Sociological Review, 35, 832-843.
9.
Cernius, V. (1988). Group relations conference brochure. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
10.
Crosbie, P. V. (1975). A social psychology of group processfordecision making. New York: Wiley.
11.
Fleishman, E. A. , & Hunt, J. G. (Eds.). (1973). Current developments in the study of kadership. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
12.
Galton, F. (1962). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. New York: Meridian Books. (Original workpublished 1869)
13.
Gibb, C. A. (1969). Leadership. In E. Aronson & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 205-282). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
Golembiewski, R. (1962). The small group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Heinicke, C. , & Bales, R F. (1953). Developmental trends in the structure of small groups. Sociometry, 16, 7-38.
16.
Hemphill, J. K (1949). Situationalfactors in leadership. Columbus: Ohio State University, Personnel Research Board.
17.
Hershey, P. , &Blanchard, K. H. (1975). Asituational frameworkfor determining appropriate leader behavior. In R. N. Cassel & R. L. Heichberger (Eds.), Leadership development: Theory and practice (pp. 126-155). North Quincy, MA: The Christopher Publishing House.
18.
Hershey, P. , & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
House, R J. , & Baetz, M. L. (1990). Leadership: Some emprical generalizations and new research directions. In L L Cummings & B. M. Shaw (Eds.), Leadership, participation, and group behavior (pp. 341-423). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
20.
Lewin, K (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
21.
Luft, J. (1984). Group processes: An introduction to group dynamics. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
22.
Mills, T. (1964). Group transformations: An analysis ofa learning group. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
Mills, T. (1967). The sociology of small groups. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Innovation and niinority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugay, & E. V. Avermate (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Moscovici, S. (1990). The generalized self and mass society. InH. Himmelweit & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Societalpsychology (pp. 66-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Mullen, B. , Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1989). Salience motivation and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership. Journal of Epeimental Social Psychology, 25, 545-559.
27.
Slater, P. (1966). Microcosm. New York: Wiley.
28.
Thornton, G. C. , & Byham, C. C. III. (1982). Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York: Academic Press.
29.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63,384-399.
30.
Tuckman, B. W. , & Jensen, M.A.C. (1977). Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
31.
Verdi, A. , & Wheelan, S. (1992). Developmental patterns in same-sex and mixed-sex groups. Small Group Research, 23,356-378.
32.
von Cranach, M. (1986). Leadership as a function of group action. In C. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of leadership (pp. 115-132). New York: Springer-Verlag.
33.
Wheelan, S. (1990). Facilitating training groups: A guide to leadership and verbal intervention skills. New York: Praeger.
34.
Wheelan, S. (1994). Groupprocesses:Adevelopmentalperspective. Boston: Allyn&Bacon.
35.
Wheelan, S. , & Abraham, M. (1993). The concept of intergroup mirroring: Reality or illusion?Human Relations, 46, 803-825.
36.
Wheelan, S. , & Krasick, C. (1993). The emergence, transmission and acceptance of themes in a temporary organization. Group & Organization Management, 18, 237-260.
37.
Wheelan, S. , & McKeage, R. (1993). Developmental patterns in small and large groups. Small Group Research, 24, 60-83.
38.
Wheelan, S. , &Verdi, A. (1992). Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups: Amethodological artifact?Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 27(1/2), 1-15.
