Two studies examined cognitive representations of ingroups and outgroups of varying relative group size. These cognitive representations were examined in the context of the category verification paradigm, wherein subjects have to decide the category membership for prototypic and nonprototypic exemplars of (ingroup and outgroup) social categories. The results of both studies confirm the prediction that the smaller group is subject to greater prototype cognitive representation, whereas the larger group is subject to greater exemplar cognitive representation. Discussion considers the implications of these results for some paradoxes of intergroup behavior, andfor stereotyping in general.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brooks, L. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Crocker, J. , & McGraw, K. M. (1984). What's good for the goose is not good for the gander: Solo status as an obstacle to occupational achievement for males and females. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 357-370.
3.
Duane, D. (1988). Spock's world. New York: Pocket Books.
4.
Duval, S. , & Siegal, K. (1978). Some determinants of objective self-awareness: Quantitative novelty. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association convention, Toronto, Canada
5.
Gerard, H. , & Hoyt, M. F. (1974). Distinctiveness of social categories and attitudes towards ingroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 836-842.
6.
Hamilton, D. L. , & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392-407.
7.
Hintzman, D. L. , & Ludlam, G. (1980). Differential forgetting of prototypes and old incidents: Simulation by an exemplar-based classification model. Memory & Cognition, 8, 378-382.
8.
Homa, D. , Sterling, S., & Trepel, L. (1981). Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7,418-439.
9.
Johnson, C. , & Mullen, B. (in press). Evidence for the accessibility of paired distinctiveness in distinctiveness-based illusory correlation in stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
10.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 465-490.
11.
Latane, B. , Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-833.
12.
Linville, P. , Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
13.
Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.
14.
Medin, D. L. , Altom, M. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 333-352.
15.
Medin, D. L. , & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification leaming. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
16.
Messick, D. M. , & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations.Annual Review ofPsychology, 40, 45-81.
17.
Miller, N. , & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.) (1984). Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation. New York: Academic Press.
18.
Miller, N. , & Davidson-Podgomy, G. (1987). Theoretical models of intergroup relations and the use of cooperative teams as an intervention for desegregated settings. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 9). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Mullen, B. (1990). Selves, others, salience, and phenomenology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Empire State Social Psychology, Blue Mountain Lake, NY.
20.
Mullen, B. (1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Joumal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297-323.
21.
Mullen, B. , Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
22.
Mullen, B. , Dovidio, J., & Skinner, M. (1991). Binocular resolution in intergroup contexts as afunction of salience. Paper presented at the convention of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York.
23.
Mullen, B. , & Hu, L. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-356.
24.
Mullen, B. , & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A metaanalytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
25.
Mullen, B. , & Johnson, C. (1990). Distinctiveness-based illusory correlation in stereotyping: A meta-analytic integration. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 11-28.
26.
Mullen, B. , & Johnson, C. (1993a). Cognitive representation in ethnophaulisms as a function of group size: The phenomenology of being in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 296-304.
27.
Mullen, B., & Johnson, C. (1993b). Cognitive representation in ethnophaulisms and illusory correlation in stereotyping. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University.
28.
Mullen, B. , Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1989). Salience, motivation, and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 545-559.
29.
Park, B. , & Hastie, R. (1987). Perception of variability in category development: Instance versus abstraction-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 621-635.
30.
Pryor, J. B. , & Ostrom, T. M. (1987). Social cognition theory of group processes. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
31.
Rothbart, M. , & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81-104.
32.
Schneider, D. J. (1991). Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 527-561.
33.
Sherman, S. J. , & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Smith, E. E. , & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Smith, E. R. , & Zarate, M. A. (1990). Exemplar and prototype use in social cognition. Social Cognition, 8, 243-262.
