This meta-analysis examined how transactive memory systems (TMS) operationalization, task characteristics, and outcome measurements moderate TMS-team outcome relationships in laboratory studies. Based on 44 studies (103 effect sizes), TMS demonstrated a moderate positive relationship with team outcomes (r = .44, 95% CI [0.36, 0.50], p < .001). Team outcome measurement approach emerged as a significant moderator: self-report scales yielded larger effects (r = .77) than observer ratings (r = .38) or embedded metrics (r = .39). Findings highlight the importance of measurement decisions in TMS research.
*AggarwalI.CuconatoG.AteşN. Y.MeslecN. (2025). Self-beliefs, transactive memory systems, and collective identification in teams: Articulating the socio-cognitive underpinnings of COHUMAIN. Topics in Cognitive Science, 17(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12681
3.
AlfredM.Del GaizoJ.KanjiF.LawtonS.CaronA.NemethL. S.AlekseyenkoA. V.ShouhedD.SavageS.AngerJ. T.CatchpoleK.CohenT. (2022). A better way: Training for direct observations in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety, 31(10), 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014171
4.
AlleyL.CortinaJ. M. (2023). WEIRDness abounds! Sample characteristics, restricted variance, and why they matter for international selection and assessment research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 31(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12422
5.
*ArgoteL.AvenB. L.KushJ. (2018). The effects of communication networks and turnover on transactive memory and group performance. Organization Science, 29(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1176
6.
AustinJ. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 866–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.866
7.
BachrachD. G.LewisK.KimY.PatelP. C.CampionM. C.ThatcherS. (2019). Transactive memory systems in context: A meta-analytic examination of contextual factors in transactive memory systems development and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 464–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000329
8.
BisbeyT.TraylorA.SalasE. (2021). Transforming teams of experts into expert teams: Eight principles of expert team performance. Journal of Expertise, 4(2), 103–119.
9.
BradleyK. J.AguinisH. (2023). Team performance: Nature and antecedents of nonnormal distributions. Organization Science, 34(3), 1266–1286. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1619
10.
CatchpoleK.NeyensD. M.AbernathyJ.AllisonD.JosephA.ReevesS. T. (2017). Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(12), 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006407
11.
*ChouH. W.LinY. H.ChouS. B. (2012). Team cognition, collective efficacy, and performance in strategic decision-making teams. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.3.381
12.
*CotardC.MichinovE. (2018). When team member familiarity affects transactive memory and skills: A simulation-based training among police teams. Ergonomics, 61(12), 1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1510547
13.
*CunninghamQ. W. (2015). The effects of surface-level and deep-level team faultline strength on information elaboration and effectiveness: Examining the moderating role of leader sensemaking and team prosocial motivation and the mediating role of transactive memory systems [Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
14.
DeChurchL. A.Mesmer-MagnusJ. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
15.
*Delamarre-AllaouiH.MichinovN.BrownG. (2020). Cultural diversity in couples and collective performance: Using a culture-based memory game to measure transactive memory. Psychological Reports, 123(4), 1176–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119835765
16.
*EllisA. P. J. (2003). The effects of acute stressors on transactive memory and shared mental models in temporary project teams: An information processing approach [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
17.
*EllisA. P. J. (2006). System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794674
18.
*FanH. L.ChangP. F.AlbaneseD.WuJ. J.YuM. J.ChuangH. J. (2016). Multilevel influences of transactive memory systems on individual innovative behavior and team innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.11.001
*GinoF.ArgoteL.Miron-SpektorE.TodorovaG. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.002
21.
*GraceR. (2004). The impact of transactive memory on the development of collective efficacy and group performance [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
22.
*GuchaitP. (2015). Examining the influence of shared mental models and transactive memory systems on the effectiveness of service management teams [Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
23.
*GuptaP.WoolleyA. W. (2018). Productivity in an era of multi-teaming: The role of information dashboards and shared cognition in team performance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), Article 62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274331
24.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in metaregression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
25.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
26.
HongQ. N.FàbreguesS.BartlettG.BoardmanF.CargoM.DagenaisP.GagnonM.-P.GriffithsF.NicolauB.O’CathainA.RousseauM.-C.VedelI.PluyeP. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
JarvenpaaS. L.MajchrzakA. (2008). Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science, 19(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0315
29.
*KanawattanachaiP.YooY. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783–808.
30.
*KeskinT.TaskinN. (2010). Transactive memory structures and collaborative information technology role in turbulent teams: An experiment. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2010). Lima, Peru.
31.
KhattakP.ShahM. W.ShahM. H. (2020). Impact of knowledge sharing and teamwork on team performance with the moderating role of supervisor support. British Journal of Research, 7(2), 1–8.
32.
KreitchmannR. S.AbadF. J.PonsodaV.NietoM. D.MorilloD. (2019). Controlling for response biases in self-report scales: Forced-choice vs. psychometric modeling of Likert items. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02309
33.
KruserJ. M.SolomonD.MoyJ. X.HollJ. L.VigliantiE. M.DetskyM. E.WiegmannD. A. (2023). Impact of interprofessional teamwork on aligning intensive care unit care with patient goals: A qualitative study of transactive memory systems. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 20(4), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-820OC
34.
KuncelN. R.TellegenA. (2009). A conceptual and empirical reexamination of the measurement of the social desirability of items: Implications for detecting desirable response style and scale development. Personnel Psychology62(2), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01136.x
35.
*LeeJ. Y.BachrachD. G.LewisK. (2014). Social network ties, transactive memory, and performance in groups. Organization Science, 25(3), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0884
36.
*LewisK. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
37.
*LewisK. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519–1533. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257
38.
*LewisK.BelliveauM.HerndonB.KellerJ. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005
39.
LewisK.HerndonB. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254–1265. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0647
40.
*LintonR. K.CritchS.KehoeE. J. (2018). Role-specific versus cross-role preparation for decision-making teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 22(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000081
41.
*LiuB.ZangZ. (2010). The mediating effects of team efficacy on the relationship between a transactive memory system and team performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(7), 865–870. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.7.865
42.
*LohC.CorderyJ. (2005). Transactive memory systems and work group performance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 137–161.
43.
LouB.BauerF.SambaC.ShepherdN. (2025). Transactive memory systems and acquisition performance: A strategic decision making process perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 62(2), 850–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13074
44.
*LuoS.WangJ.XiaoY.TongD. (2020). Two-path model of information sharing in new product development activities. Information Development, 36(3), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919852398
45.
LyuB.LiaoX.YangY. (2022). Relationships between temporal leadership, transactive memory systems and team innovation performance. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 2543–2559. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S380989
46.
*MichinovE.BlanchetC. (2015). When self-construal priming influences the relationship between transactive memory and group performance. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28(3), 97–119.
47.
*MichinovN.MichinovE. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.01.003
48.
*MoS.XieX. (2010). Team learning, transactive memory system and team performance: A longitudinal study based on the IMOI approach. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 4(3), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0104-1
49.
*MorelandR. L.MyaskovskyL. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2891
50.
NilerA. A.Mesmer-MagnusJ. R.LarsonL. E.PlummerG.DeChurchL. A.ContractorN. S. (2021). Conditioning team cognition: A meta-analysis. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(2), 144–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620972112
51.
*O’TooleJ.CiuchtaM.NevilleF.LahiriA. (2023). Transactive memory systems, temporary teams, and conflict: Innovativeness during a hackathon. Journal of Management, 49(5), 1633–1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221102397
52.
*ParkJ. (2019). Human capital resource development in teams: Antecedents, consequences, and scale development of human capital resources [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2354315116
53.
*PearsallM. J.EllisA. P. J. (2006). The effects of critical team member assertiveness on team performance and satisfaction. Journal of Management, 32(4), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306289099
54.
*PearsallM. J.EllisA. P. J.BellB. S. (2010). Building the infrastructure: The effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017781
55.
*PearsallM. J.EllisA. P. J.SteinJ. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002
56.
PeruginiA.GambarotaF.ToffaliniE.LakensD.PastoreM.FinosL.Core Team Psicostat, & AltoèG. (2025). The benefits of reporting critical-effect-size values. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 8(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251335298
57.
PodsakoffP. M.PodsakoffN. P.WilliamsL. J.HuangC.YangJ. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030
58.
*PrichardJ. S.AshleighM. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and performance. Small Group Research, 38(6), 696–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407304923
59.
*QuG.XuQ.WangJ.WuY.WangX. (2023). From interpersonal trust to team performance in app design: Roles of transactive memory systems and social ties. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(1), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10441-2
60.
RauD. (2006). Top management team transactive memory, information gathering, and perceptual accuracy. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.07.001
61.
RenY.ArgoteL. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590300
62.
*SalamutH.ChutturM. Y. (2020). An empirical study to investigate the effect of transactive memory system on software development team performance. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 5(3), Article em0117.
63.
SeehusenD. A.KleinhekselA. J.HuangH.HarrisonZ.LedfordC. J. (2023). The power of one word to paint a halo or a horn: Demonstrating the halo effect in learner handover and subsequent evaluation. Academic Medicine, 98(8), 929–933. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005161
64.
*Siegel ChristianJ.PearsallM. J.ChristianM. S.EllisA. P. (2014). Exploring the benefits and boundaries of transactive memory systems in adapting to team member loss. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035161
65.
SinzE.BanerjeeA.SteadmanR.ShotwellM. S.SlagleJ.McIvorW. R.BrazilV.BoyleL.RiegelsN.ParkC.HowardS.BouletJ. R. (2021). Reliability of simulation-based assessment for practicing physicians: Performance is context-specific. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02617-8
66.
SuC. (2020). To share or hide? A social network approach to understanding knowledge sharing and hiding in organizational work teams. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920985178
67.
*SuperJ. F.BettsT. K.KellerH.HumphreysJ. R. (2020). Simulation game outcomes: A multilevel examination of knowledge sharing norms, transactive memory systems, and individual learning goal orientations. Simulation & Gaming, 51(6), 830–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120943255
68.
Tanner-SmithE. E.TiptonE. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1091
69.
TiptonE. (2013). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with binary dependent effects. Research Synthesis Methods, 4,169–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1070
70.
*ToM. L.FisherC. D.AshkanasyN. M.ZhouJ. (2021). Feeling differently, creating together: Affect heterogeneity and creativity in project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(9), 1228–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2535
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
73.
WegnerD. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In MullenB.GoethalsG. R. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). Springer.
*WuS. (2016). Antecedents of ISD team performance: Knowledge management activities. Human Systems Management, 35(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-150854
76.
*XuN.GhahremaniH.LemoineG.TeslukP. (2022). Emergence of shared leadership networks in teams: An adaptive process perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(6), Article 101588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101588
77.
YanB.HollingsheadA. B.AlexanderK. S.CruzI.ShaikhS. J. (2020). Communication in transactive memory systems: A review and multidimensional network perspective. Small Group Research, 52(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420967764
78.
*YooY.KanawattanachaiP. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028933
79.
YuanY. C.FulkJ.MongeP. R.ContractorN. (2010). Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209351469
80.
*ZhangX.ChenH.SunY.WangN. (2016). The role of social media in collaborative learning: A coordination perspective. Wuhan International Conference on e-Business Proceedings, 25. https://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2016/25/
81.
ZhangZ. X.HempelP. S.HanY. L.TjosvoldD. (2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), Article 1722.
82.
ZhouZ.PazosP. (2020). Empirical perspectives of transactive memory systems: A meta-analysis. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 26(7–8), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-05-2020-0036
