A Conceptualization of Mood Influences on Group Judgment and Decision Making: The Key Function of Dominant Cognitive Processing Strategies

Abstract

This conceptualization describes how positive and negative mood states, information processing, cognitive processing strategies, and group interaction combine to influence group judgment and decision making. The crux of the conceptualization is a dominant cognitive processing strategy. Positive moods inform group members that the situation is benign and reinforce dominant cognitive processing strategies. Negative moods provide feedback that the situation is problematic, leading to inhibition or revision of dominant cognitive processing strategies. Moods achieve these impacts through their influences on the cognitive processes of attention, processing objectives, and cognitive representations. Group interaction also accentuates these cognitive processes and related strategies. This conceptualization is applied to understand mood influences on jury decision making, group social dilemmas, hidden profile tasks, group judgments of opinions, judgments with cognitive biases, and quantitative judgments. The discussion considers mood influences in other group judgment and decision making related phenomena of group brainstorming, intergroup negotiation, stress, and groupthink.

Keywords

positive mood negative mood group decision group judgment cognitive processing affect cognitive strategy information processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrett

L. F.

Russell

J. A.

(1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00003

Barsade

S. G.

Knight

A. P.

(2015). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316

Becker

M. W.

Leinenger

(2011). Attentional selection is biased toward mood-congruent stimuli. Emotion, 11(5), 1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023524

Bodenhausen

G. V.

Gabriel

Lineberger

(2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11(4), 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00263

Bonner

B. L.

Gonzalez

C. M.

Sommer

(2004). Centrality and accuracy in group quantity estimations. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 8(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.8.3.155

Bornstein

B. H.

Greene

(2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410397282

Bornstein

Ben-Yossef

(1994). Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1003

Bramesfeld

K. D.

Gasper

(2008). Happily putting the pieces together: A test of two explanations for the effects of mood on group-level information processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X218295

Brauer

Judd

C. M.

(1996). Group polarization and repeated attitude expressions: A new take on an old topic. European Review of Social Psychology, 7(1), 173–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779643000010

10.

Brodbeck

F. C.

Kerschreiter

Mojzisch

Schulz-Hardt

(2007). Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351441

11.

Burke

C. S.

Priest

H. A.

Salas

Sims

Mayer

(2008). Stress and teams: How stress affects decision making at the team level. In Hancock

P. A.

Szalma

J. L.

(Eds.), Performance under stress (pp. 181–208). Ashgate Publishing.

12.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Salas

(1998). Individual and team decision making under stress: Theoretical underpinnings. In Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Salas

(Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 17–38). American Psychological Association.

13.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.

14.

Chaiken

Trope

(1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. Guilford.

15.

Davis

J. H.

(1969). Group performance. Addison-Wesley.

16.

Davis

J. H.

(1996). Group decision making and quantitative judgments: A consensus model. In Witte

E. H.

Davis

J. H.

(Eds.), Understanding group behavior, Vol. 1. Consensual action by small groups (pp. 35–59). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

17.

Davis

J. H.

Hinsz

V. B.

(1982). Current research problems in group performance and group dynamics. In Brandstätter

Davis

J. H.

Stocker-Kreichgauer

(Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 1–20). Academic Press.

18.

Davis

J. H.

Kameda

Stasson

M. F.

(1992). Group risk taking: Selected topics. In Yates

J. F.

(Ed.), Risk-taking behavior (pp. 164–199). John Wiley & Sons.

19.

Dawes

R. M.

(1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125

20.

Devine

D. J.

(2012). Jury decision making: The state of the science. New York University Press.

21.

Diamond

S. S.

Casper

J. D.

Ostergren

(1989). Blindfolding the jury. Law and Contemporary Problems, 52, 247–267.

22.

Driskell

J. E.

Salas

(1991). Group decision making under stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.76.3.473

23.

Einhorn

H. J.

Hogarth

R. M.

Klempner

(1977). Quality of group judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 84(1), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.84.1.158

24.

Ekman

(1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068

25.

El-Hajje

R. A.

(1996). The effect of mood on group decision-making [Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Toledo].

26.

Evans

J. S.

(2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

27.

Fischer

A. H.

Manstead

A. S. R.

Zaalberg

(2003). Social influences on the emotion process. In Stroebe

Hewstone

(Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 171–201). Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.

28.

Forgas

J. P.

(1990). Affective influences on individual and group judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(5), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200506

29.

Forgas

J. P.

(1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39

30.

Forgas

J. P.

(1998). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.565

31.

Forgas

J. P.

(2001). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge University Press.

32.

Gawronski

Luke

D. M.

Creighton

L. A.

(2024). Dual-process theories. In Carlston

D. E.

Johnson

Hugenberg

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 319–353). Oxford University Press.

33.

George

J. M.

Dane

(2016). Affect, emotion and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.004

34.

Gigerenzer

Selten

(Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. The MIT Press.

35.

Gigerenzer

Todd

P. M.

; The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.

36.

Hastie

(1986). Experimental evidence on group accuracy. In Grofman

Owen

(Eds.), Decision research: Information pooling and group decision making (Vol. 2, pp. 129–157). JAI Press.

37.

Hastie

Penrod

S. D.

Pennington

(1983). Inside the jury. Harvard University Press.

38.

Hertel

(1999). Mood effects in social dilemmas: What we know so far. In Foddy

Smithson

Schneider

Hogg

(Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects (pp. 227–243). Psychology Press.

39.

Hertel

Fiedler

(1994). Affective and cognitive influences in social dilemma game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240110

40.

Hertel

Neuhof

Theuer

Kerr

N. L.

(2000). Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation? Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 441–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402754

41.

Hill

G. W.

(1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.91.3.517

42.

Hinsz

V. B.

(1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.4.705

43.

Hinsz

V. B.

(1999). Group decision making with responses of a quantitative nature: The theory of social decision schemes for quantities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2853

44.

Hinsz

V. B.

(2004). Metacognition and mental models in groups: An illustration with metamemory of group recognition memory. In Salas

Fiore

S. M.

(Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 33–58). American Psychological Association.

45.

Hinsz

V. B.

Bui

(2023). Socially shared affect: Shared affect, affect sharing, and affective processing in groups. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 27(4), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000207

46.

Hinsz

V. B.

Davis

J. H.

(1984). Persuasive arguments theory, group polarization and choice shifts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167284102012

47.

Hinsz

V. B.

Edwards

S. R.

Semanko

A. M.

Charles

(2023). Does group discussion exaggerate or diminish males’ reactions to a sexual assault scene? Current Psychology, 42, 24732–24741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03397-0

48.

Hinsz

V. B.

Nickell

G. S.

(2004). Positive reactions to working in groups in a study of group and individual goal decision making. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 8(4), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.253

49.

Hinsz

V. B.

Robinson

M. D.

(2024). Conceptualizing mood influences on information processing in groups via dominant cognitive processing strategies. Small Group Research, 55(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964231201102

50.

Hinsz

V. B.

Scott Tindale

Nagao

D. H.

(2008). Accentuation of information processes and biases in group judgments integrating base-rate and case-specific information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.013

51.

Hinsz

V. B.

Tindale

R. S.

Nagao

D. H.

Davis

J. H.

Robertson

B. A.

(1988). The influence of the accuracy of individuating information on the use of base rate information in probability judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(88)90017-0

52.

Hinsz

V. B.

Tindale

R. S.

Vollrath

D. A.

(1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43

53.

Hirokawa

R. Y.

Poole

M. S.

(Eds.). (1996). Communication and group decision making (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

54.

Hoyle

R. H.

Pinkley

R. L.

Insko

C. A.

(1989). Perceptions of social behavior: Evidence of differing expectations for interpersonal and intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289153007

55.

Huntsinger

J. R.

Isbell

L. M.

Clore

G. L.

(2014). The affective control of thought: Malleable, not fixed. Psychological Review, 121, 600–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037669

56.

Isenberg

D. J.

(1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.6.1141

57.

Janis

I. L.

(Ed.). (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.

58.

Jones

E. E.

Kelly

J. R.

(2009). No pain, no gains: Negative mood leads to process gains in idea-generation groups. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 13(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013812

59.

Jundt

D. K.

Hinsz

V. B.

(2002). Influences of positive and negative affect on decisions involving judgmental biases. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.1.45

60.

Kahneman

(2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

61.

Kahneman

Slovic

Tversky

(1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.

62.

Kelly

J. R.

Barsade

S. G.

(2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99–130. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2974

63.

Keren

(2015). The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons.

64.

Kerr

N. L.

MacCoun

R. J.

Kramer

G. P.

(1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103(4), 687–719. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.103.4.687

65.

Kerr

N. L.

Tindale

R. S.

(2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009

66.

Kerr

N. L.

Tindale

R. S.

(2011). Group-based forecasting? A social psychological analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(1), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.02.001

67.

Kleinmuntz

D. N.

(1987). Human decision processes: Heuristics and task structure. In Hancock

P. A.

(Ed.), Advances in Psychology (pp. 123–157). Elsevier.

68.

Koehler

D. J.

Harvey

(Eds.). (2004). Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Blackwell Publishing.

69.

Koehler

J. J.

(1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041157

70.

Kooij-de Bode

H. J. M.

Van Knippenberg

Van Ginkel

W. P

. (2010). Good effects of bad feelings: Negative affectivity and Group Decision-making. British Journal of Management, 21, 375–392.

71.

Lambert

A. J.

Payne

B. K.

Jacoby

L. L.

Shaffer

L. M.

Chasteen

A. L.

Khan

S. R.

(2003). Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the “social facilitation” of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.277

72.

Laughlin

P. R.

Bonner

B. L.

Miner

A. G.

Carnevale

P. J.

(1999). Frames of reference in quantity estimations by groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2848

73.

Lerner

J. S.

Valdesolo

Kassam

K. S.

(2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

74.

Levine

J. M.

Resnick

L. B.

Higgins

E. T.

(1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585–612. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.003101

75.

Yuan

Y. C.

McLeod

P. L.

(2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311417243

76.

Maccoun

R. J.

(1989). Experimental research on jury decision-making. Science, 244, 1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.244.4908.1046

77.

MacCoun

R. J.

Kerr

N. L.

(1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors’ bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21

78.

Mackie

D. M.

(1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 720–728. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.4.720

79.

Magnan

R. E.

Hinsz

V. B.

Nickell

G. S.

(February, 2007). Friendly and positive or hostile and negative: Perceptions of interacting alone or together with unknown individuals and groups. Presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.

80.

Magnan

R. E.

Hinsz

V. B.

(2005). Mood, gender, and situational influences on risk-taking advice for others. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.1.1

81.

Manstead

A. S. R.

(2010). Social psychology of emotion. In Baumeister

R. F.

Finkel

E. J.

(Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 101–137). Oxford University Press.

82.

Martin

L. L.

(2000). Moods do not convey information: Moods in context do. In Forgas

J. P.

(Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 153–177). Cambridge University Press.

83.

Martin

L. L.

(2001). Mood as input: A configural view of mood effects. In Martin

L. L.

Clore

G. L.

(Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 135–157). Lawrence Erlbaum.

84.

Martin

L. L.

Clore

G. L.

(2001). Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook. Lawrence Erlbaum.

85.

McGrath

J. E.

(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall.

86.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

Dechurch

L. A.

(2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773

87.

Miller

C. E.

(1989). The social psychological effects of group decision rules. In Paulus

P. B.

(Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 327–355). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

88.

Mojzisch

Kerschreiter

Faulmüller

Vogelgesang

Schulz-Hardt

(2014). The consistency principle in interpersonal communication: Consequences of preference confirmation and disconfirmation in collective decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 961–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036338

89.

Morgan

P. M.

Tindale

R. S.

(2002). Group vs individual performance in mixed-motive situations: Exploring an inconsistency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2952

90.

Myers

D. G.

Lamm

(1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602–627. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.83.4.602

91.

Nisbett

Ross

(1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Prentice Hall.

92.

Park

E. S.

Hinsz

V. B.

(2006). “Strength and safety in numbers”: A theoretical perspective on group influences on approach and avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9024-y

93.

Park

E. S.

Hinsz

V. B.

(2015). Group interaction sustains positive moods and diminishes negative moods. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice: the Official Journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association, 19, 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000034

94.

Park

Hinsz

V. B.

(2019). Judgment and decision making in teams. In Oxford bibliographies in management. Oxford University Press.

95.

Parkinson

(2020). Intragroup emotion convergence: Beyond contagion and social appraisal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319882596

96.

Paulus

P. B.

Nijstad

B. A.

(2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford University Press.

97.

Pavitt

; University of Delaware. (2018). The path to cooperative action during group social dilemmas: A literature review, set of propositions, and model describing how the opportunity to communicate encourages cooperation. Review of Communication Research, 6, 54–83. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2018.06.01.016

98.

Payne

J. W.

Bettman

J. R.

Johnson

E. J.

(1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.

99.

Pennington

Hastie

(1993). The story model for juror decision making. In Hastie

(Ed.), Inside the juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making (pp. 192–222). Cambridge University Press.

100.

Peter-Hagene

L. C.

Salerno

J. M.

Phalen

(2019). Jury decision making. In Brewer

Douglass

A. B.

(Eds.), Psychological science and the law (pp. 338–366). The Guilford Press.

101.

Plous

(1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

102.

Polzer

J. T.

(1996). Intergroup negotiations: The effects of negotiating teams. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(4), 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002796040004008

103.

Reimer

Czienskowski

(2010). Decision-making groups attenuate the discussion bias in favor of shared information: A meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 77(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903514318

104.

Russell

J. A.

(2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition & Emotion, 23(7), 1259–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902809375

105.

Salerno

J. M.

(2021). The impact of experienced and expressed emotion on legal factfinding. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17(1), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-021721-072326

106.

Sanders

G. S.

Baron

R. S.

(1977). Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90001-4

107.

Sanna

L. J.

Parks

C. D.

Chang

E. C.

(2003). Mixed-motive conflict in social dilemmas: Mood as input to competitive and cooperative goals. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 7(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.26

108.

Schultze

Mojzisch

Schulz-Hardt

(2012). Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: Group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.006

109.

Schwarz

(2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van Lange

P. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Sage.

110.

Schwarz

Clore

(2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1403&4_20

111.

Schwarz

Clore

G. L.

(1988). How do I feel about it? The informative function of mood. In Fiedler

Forgas

J. P.

(Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Hogrefe.

112.

Schwarz

Clore

G. L.

(1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In Higgins

E. T.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). Guilford Press.

113.

Sieber

Ziegler

(2019). Group polarization revisited: A processing effort account. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1482–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219833389

114.

Simon

H. A.

(Ed.). (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). Free Press.

115.

Sniezek

J. A.

Henry

R. A.

(1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90055-1

116.

Sohrab

S. G.

Waller

M. J.

Kaplan

(2015). Exploring the hidden-profile paradigm: A literature review and analysis. Small Group Research, 46(5), 489–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415599068

117.

Stamos

Bruyneel

De Rock

Cherchye

Dewitte

(2018). A dual-process model of decision-making: The symmetric effect of intuitive and cognitive judgments on optimal budget allocation. Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000075

118.

Stanovich

K. E.

(1999). Who is rational?: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

119.

Stasser

(1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(5), 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(88)90028-5

120.

Stasser

(1992). Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A "thought experiment.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 156–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90049-d

121.

Stasser

Abele

(2020). Collective choice, collaboration, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103211

122.

Stasser

Dietz-Uhler

(2001). Collective choice, judgment and problem solving. In Hogg

M. A.

Tindale

R. S.

(Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 31–55). Blackwell Publishers.

123.

Stasser

Stewart

(1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.426

124.

Stasser

Stewart

D. D.

Wittenbaum

G. M.

(1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(3), 244–265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1012

125.

Stasser

Taylor

L. A.

Hanna

(1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.1.67

126.

Stasser

Titus

(2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1403&4_21

127.

Stasson

M. F.

Bradshaw

S. D.

(1995). Explanations of individual-group performance differences: What sort of “bonus” can be gained through group interaction? Small Group Research, 26(2), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495262007

128.

Stoner

J. A. F.

(1968). Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(4), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90069-3

129.

Storbeck

Clore

G. L.

(2008). Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1824–1843. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1751-9004.2008.00138.X

130.

Sunstein

C. R.

Hastie

(2015). Wiser: Getting beyond groupthink to make groups smarter. Harvard Business Press.

131.

Tetlock

P. E.

Gardner

(2015). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. Crown Publishers/Random House.

132.

Thomadsen

Rooderkerk

R. P.

Amir

Arora

Bollinger

Hansen

John

Liu

Sela

Singh

Sudhir

Wood

(2018). How context affects choice. Customer Needs and Solutions, 5, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-017-0084-9

133.

Thompson

L. L.

(Ed.). (2020). The mind and heart of the negotiator (7th ed.). Pearson.

134.

Tiedens

L. Z.

Sutton

R. I.

Fong

C. T.

(2004). Emotional variation in work groups. In Tiedens

L. Z.

Leach

C. W.

(Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 164–186). Cambridge University Press.

135.

Tindale

R. S.

Kameda

Hinsz

V. B.

(2003). Group decision making. In Hogg

M. A.

Cooper

(Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 381–403). Sage.

136.

Tindale

R. S.

Winget

J. R.

(2019). Group decision-making. In Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.262

137.

M. L.

Ashkanasy

N. M.

Fischer

C. D.

(2017). Affect and creativity in work teams. In Salas

Rico

Passmore

(Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes (pp. 441–457). John Wiley & Sons.

138.

Tuncel

Doucet

(2023). Mixed feelings: Effects of mood diversity on groups’ discussion of disconfirming information and evaluation of alternatives. Group Decision and Negotiation, 32(3), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09823-3

139.

Tversky

(1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032955

140.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

141.

van Kleef

G. A.

Côté

. (2018). Emotional dynamics in conflict and negotiation: Individual, dyadic, and group processes. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104714

142.

van Kleef

G. A.

Côté

. (2022). The social effects of emotions. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 629–658. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-010855

143.

van Knippenberg

Kooij-de Bode

H. J. M.

van Ginkel

W. P

. (2010). The interactive effects of mood and trait negative affect in group decision making. Organization Science, 21, 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0461

144.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

Joireman

Parks

C. D.

Van Dijk

. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003

145.

Vinokur

Burstein

(1974). Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036010

146.

Vroom

V. H.

(1969). Industrial social psychology. In Lindzey

Aronson

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 5, 2nd ed., pp. 196–286). Addisson-Wesley.

147.

Wageman

(1999). Research on managing groups and teams: Groups in context (Vol. 2). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.

148.

Wallace

D. M.

Hinsz

V. B.

(2019). A social judgment analysis of information processing in groups: Capacity and consistency in information processing impacts group judgment. Group Dynamics, 23(3-4), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000107

149.

Wang

Park

Bui

Hinsz

V. B.

(2024). Team emotion: An integrative conceptual and empirical review. University of Alberta.

150.

Watson

(2000). Mood and temperament. Guilford Press.

151.

Watson

Wiese

Vaidya

Tellegen

(1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 820–838. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.5.820

152.

Wiener

R. L.

Bornstein

B. H.

Voss

(2006). Emotion and the law: A framework for inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9025-0

153.

Wildschut

Pinter

Vevea

J. L.

Insko

C. A.

Schopler

(2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 698–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.698

154.

Yoon

Y.-J.

Larson

J. R.

Huntsinger

J. R.

(2022). The flexible impact of member affect in groups performing complex decision-making tasks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 602–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220985601

155.

Young

N. A.

Shuster

M. M.

Mikels

J. A.

(2019). The sure thing: The role of integral affect in risky choice framing. Emotion, 19(6), 1035–1043. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000505

156.

Zajonc

R. B.

(1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269

157.

Zajonc

R. B.

(1980). Compresence. In Paulus

P. B.

(Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 35–60). Lawrence Erlbaum.

158.

Zajonc

R. B.

Wolosin

R. J.

Wolosin

M. A.

Loh

W. D.

(1970). Social facilitation and imitation in group risk-taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(70)90074-0