Recent global events have triggered compositional changes in the workplace (e.g., intentional diversification and sudden team member removal). This study investigates whether team gender diversity and the novelty of membership changes moderate the relationship between team processes and performance. We found that development of team confidence plays a pivotal role in shaping performance through its influence on backup behavior. Moreover, gender-balanced teams were better at translating their confidence into backup behaviors, and teams experiencing reduced novelty during membership change events tend to leverage these behaviors more effectively, leading to enhanced overall performance. We explored several theoretical and practical implications.
AbankwaD. A.RowlinsonS.AdinyiraE. (2019). Conceptualizing team adaptability and project complexity: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2019.10.1.827
2.
ArgoteL.AvenB. L.KushJ. (2018). The effects of communication networks and turnover on transactive memory and group performance. Organization Science, 29(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1176
3.
ArrowH.McGrathJ. E. (1995). Membershipdynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 373–411). JAI Press.
4.
BarnesC. M.HollenbeckJ. R.WagnerD. T.DeRueD. S.NahrgangJ. D.SchwindK. M. (2008). Harmful help: The costs of backing-up behavior in teams. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.529
5.
BergmanJ. Z.RentschJ. R.SmallE. E.DavenportS. W.BergmanS. M. (2012). The shared leadership process in decision-making teams. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.538763
6.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7). Free Press.
7.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
8.
BurkeC. S.StaglK. C.SalasE.PierceL.KendallD. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
9.
CabreraE. F. (2007). Opting out and opting in: understanding the complexities of women’s career transitions. Career Development International, 12(3), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710745872
10.
ChandlerG. N.HonigB.WiklundJ. (2005). Antecedents, moderators, and performance consequences of membership change in new venture teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.09.001
11.
ChanT. H.LiuH.KeckS.TangW. (2023). When do teams generate valuable inventions? The moderating role of invention integrality on the effects of expertise similarity, network cohesion, and gender diversity. Production and Operations Management, 32(6), 1760–1777. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13939
ChoiH. S.ThompsonL. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.003
14.
CoxT. H.BlakeS. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274465
15.
DávilaM. C.Jiménez GarcíaG. (2012). Organizational identification and commitment: Correlates of sense of belonging and affective commitment. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37316
16.
DavisA. S.KafkaA. M.González-MoralesM. G.FeitosaJ. (2022). Team belonging: Integrating teamwork and diversity training through emotions. Small Group Research, 53(1), 88–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211044813
17.
DeRueD. S.BarnesC. M.MorgesonF. P. (2010). Understanding the motivational contingencies of team leadership. Small Group Research, 41(5), 621–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410373808
18.
DeRueD. S.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM. D.IlgenD. R.JundtD. K. (2008). How different team downsizing approaches influence team-level adaptation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30776769
19.
DhananiL. Y.JohnsonR. C.PueschelA. (2021). The inequity of crisis: COVID-19 as a case for diversity management. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1–2), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.12
20.
DickinsonT. L.McIntyreR. M. (1997). Aconceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In BrannickM. T.SalasE.PrinceC. (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 19–43). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
DiefendorffJ. M.ChandlerM. M. (2011). Motivating employees. In ZedeckS.AguinisH.CascioW. F.GelfandM. J.LeungK.ParkerS. K.ZhouJ. (Eds.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (Vol. 3, pp. 65–135). American Psychological Association.
DlouhyK.CasperA. (2021). Downsizing and surviving employees’ engagement and strain: The role of job resources and job demands. Human Resource Management, 60(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22032
24.
DuimeringP. R.RobinsonR. B. (2007). Situational influences on team helping norms: Case study of a self-directed team. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(1), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.16779
25.
ElmsA. K.GillH.Gonzalez-MoralesM. G. (2023). Confidence is key: Collective efficacy, team processes, and team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 54(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964221104218
26.
FarhC. I. C.OhJ. K.HollenbeckJ. R.YuA.LeeS. M.KingD. D. (2020). Token female voice enactment in traditionally male-dominated teams: Facilitating conditions and consequences for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 832–856. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0778
27.
FisherD. M. (2014). Distinguishing between taskwork and teamwork planning in teams: Relations with coordination and interpersonal processes. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034625
FuS.GrecoL. M.LennardA. C.DimotakisN. (2021). Anxiety responses to the unfolding COVID-19 crisis: Patterns of change in the experience of prolonged exposure to stressors. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000855
30.
GlowinskiD.BraccoF.ChiorriC.GrandjeanD. (2016). Music ensemble as a resilient system. Managing the unexpected through group interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01548
GrossmanR.FeitosaJ. (2018). Team trust over time: Modeling reciprocal and contextual influences in action teams. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.006
33.
GruenfeldD. H.MannixE. A.WilliamsK. Y.NealeM. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0061
34.
HarrisonD. A.PriceK. H.BellM. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/256901
35.
HayesA. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
36.
HeaveyA. L.SimsekZ. (2014). Learning to be a better boss: How literally closing the distance improves leader effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 43(3), 237–242.
37.
HoggM. A.GaffneyA. M. (2023). Social identity dynamics in the face of overwhelming uncertainty. In ForgasJ. P.CranoW. D.FiedlerK. (Eds.), The psychology of insecurity: Seeking certainty where none can be found (pp. 244–265). Routledge.
38.
HoogendoornS.OosterbeekH.van PraagM. (2013). The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 59(7), 1514–1528. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1674
39.
HuangF.DrigaA.LeGuerrierB. E.SchmitzR.Hall-LavoieD. M.KostarasX.ChuK. P.PituskinE.WatanabeS. M.FairchildA. (2016). Supporting patients with incurable cancer: Backup behavior in multidisciplinary cross-functional teams. Journal of Oncology Practice/American Society of Clinical Oncology, 12(11), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2016.013912
40.
HughesE.DonnellyR. (2022). Theorising the impact of macroturbulence on work and HRM: COVID-19 and the abrupt shift to enforced homeworking. Human Resource Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12465
41.
HuJ.LidenR. C. (2015). Making a difference in the teamwork: Linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1102–1127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1142
42.
HumphreyS. E.AimeF. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.904140
43.
HumphreyS. E.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
44.
JacksonP.KlobasJ. (2008). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.05.001
45.
JanardhananN. S.LewisK.RegerR. K.StevensC. K. (2020). Getting to know you: Motivating cross-understanding for improved team and individual performance. Organization Science, 31(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1324
KaurN.AroraP. (2020). Acknowledging gender diversity and inclusion as key to organizational growth: A review and trends. Journal of critical reviews, 7(06), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.06.25
48.
KirkmanB. L.RosenB.GibsonC. B.TeslukP. E.McPhersonS. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from sabre, inc. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 16(3), 67–79.
49.
KochanT.BezrukovaK.ElyR.JacksonS.JoshiA.JehnK.LeonardJ.LevineD.ThomasD. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10061
50.
KonradtU.SchippersM. C.GarbersY.SteenfattC. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2015.1005608
51.
KozlowskiS. W.IlgenD. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
52.
KozlowskiS. W. J.GullyS. M.NasonE. R.SmithE. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In IlgenD. R.PulakosE. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 240–292). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
53.
KozlowskiS. W.WatolaD. J.JensenJ. M.KimB. H.BoteroI. C. (2009). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership. In SalasE.GoodwinG. F.BurkeC. S. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 147–190). Routledge.
54.
KukenbergerM. R.D’InnocenzoL. (2020). The building blocks of shared leadership: The interactive effects of diversity types, team climate, and time. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12318
55.
LeeC.FarhJ. (2004). Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Psychologie Appliquee, 53(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00164.x
56.
LeeH. W.ChoiJ. N.KimS. (2018). Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.005
LeungK.WangJ. (2015). Social processes and team creativity in multicultural teams: A socio-technical framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 1008–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2021
59.
LevineJ. M.ChoiH.-S. (2004). Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition. In SalasE.FioreS. M. (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 153–176). American Psychological Association.
60.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 305–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000093
61.
LimW. L.RasdiR. M. (2019). “Opt-out” or pushed out? Factors influencing married women professionals’ decision in leaving the workforce. European Journal of Training and Development, 43(9), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2019-0063
62.
LiN.ZhaoH. H.WalterS. L.ZhangX. A.YuJ. (2015). Achieving more with less: Extra milers’ behavioral influences in teams. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000010
63.
LindsleyD. H.BrassD. J.ThomasJ. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 645–678. https://doi.org/10.2307/258790
64.
LiY.KoopmannJ.LanajK.HollenbeckJ. R. (2022). An integration-and-learning perspective on gender diversity in self-managing teams: The roles of learning goal orientation and shared leadership. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(9), 1628–1639. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000942
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/259182
67.
MarksM. A.PanzerF. J. (2004). The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Human Performance, 17(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1701_2
68.
Martin-RaughM.TannenbaumR. J.TocciC. M.ReeseC. (2016). Behaviorally anchored rating scales: An application for evaluating teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.026
69.
MarupingL. M.AgarwalR. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975
70.
MathieuJ. E.ButtonS. B. (1992). An examination of the relative impact of normative information and self-efficacy on personal goals and performance over time1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(22), 1758–1775. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00975.x
71.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106
72.
MathieuJ. E.WolfsonM. A.ParkS. (2018). The evolution of work team research since Hawthorne. The American Psychologist, 73(4), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000255
73.
McGrathJ. E.ArrowH.BerdahlJ. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0401_8
74.
ModaresnezhadM.AndrewsM. C.Mesmer-MagnusJ.ViswesvaranC.DeshpandeS. (2021). Anxiety, job satisfaction, supervisor support and turnover intentions of mid-career nurses: A structural equation model analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(5), 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13229
75.
MorgesonF. P.MitchellT. R.LiuD. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. The Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0099
76.
MujtabaB. G.SenathipT. (2020). Layoffs and downsizing implications for the leadership role of human resources. Journal of Service Science and Management, 13(02), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2020.132014
77.
Nederveen PieterseA.van KnippenbergD.van GinkelW. P. (2011). Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.003
78.
NielsenM. W.AlegriaS.BörjesonL.EtzkowitzH.Falk-KrzesinskiH. J.JoshiA.LeaheyE.Smith-DoerrL.WoolleyA. W.SchiebingerL. (2017). Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 1740–1742. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700616114
79.
NishiiL. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
80.
NordqvistS.HovmarkS.Zika-ViktorssonA. (2004). Perceived time pressure and social processes in project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.11.005
81.
OrmeG. J.KehoeJ. E. (2020). Cohesion and performance in military occupation specialty training. Military Medicine, 185(3–4), e325–e330. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz217
82.
PorterC. O. L. H. (2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.811
83.
PorterC. O. L. H.HollenbeckJ. R.IlgenD. R.EllisA. P.WestB. J.MoonH. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.391
84.
PorterC. O. L. H.Itir GogusC.YuR. C. F. (2010). When does teamwork translate into improved team performance? A resource allocation perspective. Small Group Research, 41(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409356319
85.
PorterC. O. L. H.Itir GogusC.YuR. C. F. (2011). Does backing up behavior explain the efficacy—Performance relationship in teams?Small Group Research, 42(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410390964
86.
PowellG. N. (2018). Women and men in management. Sage.
87.
RaoR. D.ArgoteL. (2006). Organizational learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and structure. European Management Review, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500057
88.
ReinwaldM.KunzeF. (2020). Being different, being absent? A dynamic perspective on demographic dissimilarity and absenteeism in blue-collar teams. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 660–684. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0290
89.
Reiter-PalmonR.PaulusP. B. (2019). Cognitive and social processes in team creativity. In MumfordM. D.ToddE. M. (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizations (pp. 161–190). Routledge.
90.
RobersonQ. M. (2019). Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 69–88.
91.
Ruiz-JiménezJ. M.Ruiz-ArroyoM.Cabeza PullesD. (2014). Gender diversity, knowledge combination and innovation in the technological context. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 16531. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.16531abstract
92.
SadlerG. R.KoC. M.AlisangcoJ.RosbrookB. P.MillerE.FullertonJ. (2007). Sample size considerations when groups are the appropriate unit of analyses. Applied Nursing Research, 20(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2006.02.004
Sanchez-ManzanaresM.RicoR.AntinoM.UitdewilligenS. (2020). The joint effects of leadership style and magnitude of the disruption on team adaptation: A longitudinal experiment. Group & Organization Management, 45(6), 836–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120958838
95.
SchneidM.IsidorR.LiC.KabstR. (2015). The influence of cultural context on the relationship between gender diversity and team performance: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.957712
96.
SchwarzerR. (2001). Social-cognitive factors in changing health-related behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00112
97.
SeongJ. Y.HongD. S. (2013). Gender diversity: How can we facilitate its positive effects on teams?Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal, 41(3), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.3.497
98.
SerdarC. C.CihanM.YücelD.SerdarM. A. (2021). Sample size, power and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochemia Medica, 31(1), 010502. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.010502
99.
Siegel ChristianJ.PearsallM. J.ChristianM. S.EllisA. P. J. (2014). Exploring the benefits and boundaries of transactive memory systems in adapting to team member loss. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 18(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035161
100.
SklarM.EhrhartM. G.AaronsG. A. (2021). COVID-related work changes, burnout, and turnover intentions in mental health providers: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 44(3), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000480
101.
SmithP. C.KendallL. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 47(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047060
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories—Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
105.
TasaK.SearsG. J.SchatA. C. H. (2011). Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross-level moderating role of collective efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.680
106.
Thomas-HuntM. C.PhillipsK. W. (2003). Managing teams in the dynamic organization: The effects of revolving membership and changing task demands on expertise and status in groups. In PetersonR. S.MannixE. A. (Eds.), Leading and managing people in the dynamic organization (pp. 115–134). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
107.
TrainerH. M.JonesJ. M.PendergraftJ. G.MaupinC. K.CarterD. R. (2020). Team membership change “events”: A review and reconceptualization. Group & Organization Management, 45(2), 219–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120910848
108.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
109.
UitdewilligenS.WallerM. J.ZijlstraF. R. H. (2010). Team cognition and adaptability in dynamic settings: A review of pertinent work. In HodgkinsonG. P.FordJ. K. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2010 (Vol. 25, pp. 293–353). John Wiley & Sons.
110.
Van Den BosscheP.GijselaersW.SegersM.WoltjerG.KirschnerP. (2011). Team learning: Building shared mental models. Instructional Science, 39(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3
111.
van der VegtG. S.BundersonS.KuipersB. (2010). Why turnover matters in self-managing work teams: Learning, social integration, and task flexibility. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1168–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309344117
112.
WilliamsonH. C.BornsteinJ. X.CantuV.CiftciO.FarnishK. A.SchouweilerM. T. (2022). How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(4), 1087–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211053849
113.
YangY.Sánchez-TójarA.O’DeaR. E.NobleD. W. A.KorichevaJ.JennionsM. D.ParkerT. H.LagiszM.NakagawaS. (2023). Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biology, 21, 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
