A resource dilemma is a circumstance in which an aggregate of people share a slowly replenishing resource pool out of which each person can harvest for her or his own use. Successful management of a resource pool demands adequate leadership, but the content of leadership-relevant communication and its relationship with group performance and group members' perceptions of their experience has not been examined. In a study of 97 experimental simulations of a group resource dilemma, procedural leadership and three types of substantive leadership (information giving, initiating, and evaluating) were consistently, although weakly, associated with total group harvesting and/or with participant judgments relevant to group cooperation.
Auld, F., Jr., & White, A.M. (1956). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. Journal of Psychology, 42, 273-281.
2.
Bales, R.F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-161). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
3.
Benne, K.D., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41-49.
4.
Blalock, H.M. (1960). Social statistics. New York : McGraw-Hill.
5.
Bornstein, G. (1992). Group decision and individual choice in intergroup competition for public goods. In W. Leibrand , D. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 247-263). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
6.
DeCremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (2002). Intergroup and intragroup aspects of leadership in social dilemmas: A relational model of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 126-136.
7.
Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn, Germany: Bonn University, Department of Psychology. Retrieved June 22, 2004, from http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower
8.
Folger, J.P., Hewes, D.E., & Poole, M.S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 115-161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
9.
Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding quantitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47-58.
10.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science , 162, 1243-1248.
11.
Hirokawa, R.Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487-515.
12.
Hirokawa, R.Y. (1994). Functional approaches to the study of group discussion: Even good notions have their problems. Small Group Research , 25, 542-550.
13.
Jarboe, S. (1988). A comparison of input-output, process-output, and input-process-output models of small group problem-solving effectiveness . Communication Monographs, 55, 121-142.
14.
Ketrow, S.M. (1991). Communication role specialization and perceptions of leadership. Small Group Research, 22, 492-514.
15.
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C.C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587-604.
16.
Mabry, E.A., & Attridge, M.D. (1990). Small group interaction and outcome correlates for structured and unstructured task. Small Group Research, 21, 315-332.
17.
Messick, D.M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M.B., Kramer, R.M., Zemke, P.E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
18.
Meyers, R.A., & Brashers, D.E. (1998). Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument-outcome link. Communication Monographs, 65, 261-281.
19.
Morris, C.G., & Hackman, J.R. (1969). Behavioral correlates of perceived leadership . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 350-361.
20.
Nutt, P.D. (1994). Planning methods. New York : John Wiley.
21.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Pavitt, C. (1994). Theoretical commitments presupposed by functional approaches to group discussion. Small Group Research, 25, 520-541.
24.
Pavitt, C., & Curtis, E. (n.d.). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach. Available at http://www.udel.edu/communication/pavitt/bookindex.htm
25.
Pavitt, C., McFeeters, C., Towey, E., & Zingerman, V. (2005). Communication during resource dilemmas: 1. Effects of different replenishment rates. Communication Monographs , 72, 345-363.
26.
Pavitt, C., Whitchurch, G.G., McClurg, H., & Petersen, N. (1995). Melding the objective and subjective sides of leadership: Perceptions and behaviors in decision-making groups. Communication Monographs, 62, 243-264.
27.
Pavitt, C., Zingerman, V., Towey, E., & McFeeters, C. (2006). Group communication during resource dilemmas: 2. Effects of harvest limit and reward asymmetry. Communication Research, 33, 64-91.
28.
Rutte, C.G., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1985). Preference for decision structures in a social dilemma situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 367-370.
29.
Samuelson, C.D. (1993). A multiattribute evaluation approach to structural change in resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 298-304.
30.
Samuelson, C.D., & Messick, D.M. (1986a). Alternative structural solutions to resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 37, 139-155.
31.
Samuelson, C.D., & Messick, D.M. (1986b). Inequities in access to and use of shared resources in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51, 960-967.
32.
Samuelson, C.D., Messick, D.M., Rutte, C.G., & Wilke, H. (1984). Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 94-104.
33.
Schittekatte, M., & Van Hiel, A. (1996). Effects of partially shared information and awareness of unshared information on information sampling. Small Group Research, 27, 431-449.
34.
Scott, W.A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case for nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
35.
Stasser, G., Stewart, D.D., & Wittenbaum, G.M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 231-244.
36.
Tang, S.Y. (1994). Institutions and performance in irrigation systems . In E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, & J. Walker (Eds.), Rules, games, and common-pool resources (pp. 225-245). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Turk, H. (1961). Instrumental and expressive ratings reconsidered . Sociometry, 24, 76-81.
38.
van Dijk, E., & Grodzka, M. (1992). The influence of endowments asymmetry and information level on the contribution to a public step good. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 329-342.
39.
van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., Wilke, M., & Metman, L. (1999). What information do we use in social dilemmas? Environmental uncertainty and the employment of coordination rules. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 109-135.
40.
van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., & Wit, A. (2003). Preferences for leadership in social dilemmas: Public goods dilemmas versus common resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 170-176.
41.
Van Vugt, M., & DeCremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
42.
Whitchurch, G., & Pavitt, C. (1990). Auld and White revisited: Expanded and updated rules for unitizing verbal interaction. Unpublished manuscript.
43.
Wit, A., & Wilke, H. (1988). Subordinates' endorsement of an allocating leader in a commons dilemma: An equity theoretical approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 151-168.
