This article focuses on the way in which followers' personality characteristics shape their perception of transformational leaders. After a review of prior research, a study using a U.S. employee sample is presented in which follower extraversion and agreeableness are found to be related to the perception of transformational leadership. On the basis of this research, the authors formulate questions concerning the relationship between followers' personality and the perception of transformational leadership. With reference to these questions, the authors outline an agenda for future research.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
2.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarotza, P., De Vries, R. E., Blas, L. D., et al. (2004). Personality processes and individual differences—A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycho lexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-365.
3.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
4.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Technical report. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
5.
Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901-910.
6.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The Neo-Personality Inventory. Manual form S and form R. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7.
Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.” Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
8.
Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2006). Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 708-741.
9.
Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1099.
10.
Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
11.
Hetland, H., & Sandal, G. M. (2003). Transformational leadership in Norway: Outcomes and personality correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 147-170.
12.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Company values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
14.
House, R. J., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Leadership and organizations: A 62 nation GLOBE study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
House, R. J., & Howell, J. M. (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 81-108.
16.
House, R. J. & Shamir, B. (1993). Towards the integration of transformational, charismatic and visionary theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and direction (pp. 81-107). San Diego, CA: Academic.
17.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751-765.
18.
Keller, T. (1999). Images of the familiar: Individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 589-607.
19.
Klein, K. J., & House, R. J. (1998). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches—Part B: Contemporary and alternative (pp. 3-22). Stamford, CT: JAI.
20.
Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 87-128.
21.
Lowe, K. B., Kroek, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
22.
Meindl, J. R. (1990). On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 159-203.
23.
Meindl, J. R. (1993). Reinventing leadership: A radical, social psychological approach. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations (pp. 89-118). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113-131.
25.
Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Krgulanski, A. W. (2005). Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 503-516.
26.
Schneider, B. (1998). There IS some there there. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches—Part B: Contemporary and alternative(pp. 311-319). Stamford, CT: JAI.
27.
Schyns, B., & Collani, G. V. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organisational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 219-241.
28.
Schyns, B., & Sanders, K. (in press). Personality and the perception of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
29.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-19.
30.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations(p. 7-24). Chicago: Nelsen Hall.
31.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N., & Wilke, H. (1994). In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 289-300.
33.
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., de Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856.
34.
Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self-other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546-558.
