Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study examined how decisions, actions, and orders combine to act as influence strategies that occur throughout different stages in gang rape. Thirty-nine gang rape cases, yielding 120 offenders, were coded according to each individual’s level of involvement at each stage in terms of decisions, actions, and orders. The various combinations of these were examined using a multidimensional scaling procedure. This revealed that the behaviors form a partially ordered scale of influence in which involvement in the approach and/or disposal of the victim were the most significant stages of the offense. Individual scores on this scale revealed that in 37 of the cases, one individual scored significantly higher on the scale than his co-offenders. The scale successfully identified leaders in 37 of the 39 groups, with leaders scoring significantly higher on the scale than followers (other group members). The results and implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in forcible rape (Chap. 12). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Arnold, J. A. , Arad, S. , Rhoades, J. A. , & Drasgow, F. (2000). The Empowering Leadership Questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269.

Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: McCaleb-Seiler.

Baron, R. A. , & Byrne, D. (1991). Social psychology: Understanding human interaction (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bohm, J. , & Alison, L. (in press). An exploratory method for distinguishing destructive cults. Psychology Crime & Law.

Cialdini, R. B. (1992). Influence. New York: Longman Higher Education.

Clark, K. E. , & Clark, M. B. (1990). Measures of leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.

Dancer, L. S. (1990). Suicide prediction and the partial order scalogram analysis of psychological adjustment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39(4), 479-497.

Dipboye, R. , Smith, C. , & Howell, W. (1994). Understanding industrial and organisational psychology: An integrated approach. London: Harcourt Brace.

10.

Donald, I. , & Wilson, A. (2000). Ram raiding: Criminals working in groups. In D. V. Canter & L. J. Alison (Eds.), The social psychology of crime (Chap. 7). Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.

11.

Hazelwood, R. R. (1983). The behavio-oriented interview of rape victims: The key to profiling. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 52, 8-15.

12.

Grubin, D. , Kelly, P. , & Ayis, S. (1997, May). Linking serious sexual assaults. London: Home Office Police Policy Directorate-Police Research Group.

13.

Guttman, R. , & Greenbaum, C. W. (1998). Facet theory: Its development and current status. European Psychologist, 3(1), 13-36.

14.

LeBeau, J. L. (1987). The journey to rape: Geographic distance and rapist’s method of approaching the victim. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(2), 129-136.

15.

Lindgren, H. C. (1973). An introduction to social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

16.

McGrath, J. E. (1978). Small group research. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(5), 651-674.

17.

Pennington, D. , Gillen, K. , & Hill, P. (1999). Social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

Secord, P. F. , & Backman, C. W. (1974). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

19.

Shye, S. , Elizur, D. , & Hoffman, M. (1994). Introduction to facet theory: Content design and intrinsic data analysis in behavioural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

A Partially Ordered Scale of Influence in Violent Group Behavior

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References