In this study, we address the reduction of structural vibrations by means of an electromagnetic shunt damper (EMSD) combined with a mechanical dynamic vibration absorber (DVA). Two architectures, that differs in the placement of the EMSD with respect to the DVA, are tested, showing that one of them enhances the vibration control. In parallel, three shunt architecture are tested: a resistive shunt, a resonant conservative shunt and a resonant dissipative shunt. Optimal values of the EMSD and DVA parameters are obtained; then, the performances of all architecture, according to relevant criteria, are estimated and compared to a single DVA or a single EMSD. The case of a conservative DVA, that creates an anti-resonance, is particularly targeted. It is shown that the performances rely on two free parameters only: the mass ratio for the DVA and the electromagnetic coupling factor for the EMSD, thus giving generic abacuses that can be applied to any practical cases. Finally, experiments are proposed and a good agreement with the theoretical results is obtained, thus validating them.
ANSI/IEEE Std 176-1987 (1988) IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity. Newtork: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
2.
AoWKReynoldsP (2019) Evaluation of optimal analysis, design, and testing of electromagnetic shunt damper for vibration control of a civil structure. Structural Control Health Monitoring27(3): e2495.
3.
AoWKReynoldsP (2020) Analysis and numerical evaluation of and optimal design schemes for an electromagnetic shunt damper. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics142(2): 021003.
4.
AsaiTArakiYIkagoK (2017) Energy harvesting potential of tuned inertial mass electromagnetic transducers. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing84: 659–672.
5.
BaeJ-SHwangJ-HRohJ-H, et al. (2012) Vibration suppression of a cantilever beam using magnetically tuned-mass-damper. Journal of Sound and Vibration331: 5669–5684.
6.
BarredoEBlancoAColìnJ, et al. (2018) Closed-form solutions for the optimal design of inerter-based dynamic vibration absorbers. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences144: 41–53.
7.
BehrensSFlemingAJMoheimaniSOR (2003) Electromagnetic shunt damping. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM 2003), Vol. 2, pp. 1145–1150. Kobe, Japan: IEEE.
8.
BerardengoMThomasOGiraud-AudineC, et al. (2016) Improved resistive shunt by means of negative capacitance: new circuit, performances and multi-mode control. Smart Materials and Structures25(7): 075033.
9.
BourquinFCarusoGPeigneyM, et al. (2014) Magnetically tuned mass dampers for optimal vibration damping of large structures. Smart Materials and Structures23: 085009.
10.
BrockJE (1946) A note on the damped vibration absorber. Journal of Applied Mechanics68: A–284.
11.
Busch-VishniacI (1999) Electromechanical Sensors and Actuators. Newyork: Springer.
12.
CarusoG (2001) A critical analysis of electric shunt circuits employed in piezoelectric passive vibration damping. Smart Materials and Structures10(5): 1059–1068.
13.
ChengTHOhIK (2009) A current-flowing electromagnetic shunt damper for multi-mode vibration control of cantilever beams. Smart Materials and Structures18: 095036.
14.
ChungL-LLaiY-AYangC-S, et al. (2013) Semi-active tuned mass dampers with phase control. Journal of Sound and Vibration332: 3610–3625.
DucarneJThomasODeüJ-F (2010) Structural vibration reduction by switch shunting of piezoelectric elements: modelling and optimization. Journal of Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures21(8): 797–816.
17.
ElliottSJZillettiM (2014) Scaling of electromagnetic transducers for shunt damping and energy harvesting. Journal of Sound and Vibration333: 2185–2195.
18.
FirestoneFA (1933) A new analogy between mechanical and electrical systems. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America4: 249–267.
19.
ForwardRL (1979) Electronic damping of vibrations in optical structures. Applied Optics18(5): 690–697.
20.
FrahmH (1911) Device for Damping Vibrations of Bodies (Technical Report No. 989958, U.S. Patent).
21.
GravesKEToncichDIovenittiPG (2000) Theoretical comparison of motional and transformer emf device damping efficiency. Journal of Sound and Vibration233(2): 441–453.
22.
HagoodNWVon FlotowA (1991) Damping of structural vibrations with piezoelectric materials and passive electrical networks. Journal of Sound and Vibration146(2): 243–268.
HøgsbergJ (2019) Vibration control by piezoelectric proof-mass absorber with resistive-inductive shunt. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures28(2): 141–153.
25.
HøgsbergJ (2020) Consistent frequency-matching calibration procedure for electromechanical shunt absorbers. Journal of Vibration and Control26(13-14): 1133–1144
26.
InoueTIshidaYSumiM (2008) Vibration suppression using electromagnetic resonant shunt damper. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics130(041003): 1–8.
27.
KrenkS (2005) Frequency analysis of the tuned mass damper. Journal of Applied Mechanics72: 936–942.
28.
KrenkSHøgsbergJ (2016) Tuned resonant mass or inerter-based absorbers: unified calibration with quasi-dynamic flexibility and inertia correction. Proceedings of the Royal Society A472(2185): 20150718.
29.
LanchesterFW (1914) Damping Torsional Vibrations in Crank Shafts (Technical Report No. 1085443, U.S. Patent).
30.
LiuKLiuJ (2005) The damped dynamic vibration absorbers: revisited and new result. Journal of Sound and Vibration284: 1181–1189.
31.
LiuYLinC-CParkerJ, et al. (2016) Exact h2 optimal tuning and experimental verification of energy-harvesting series electromagnetic tuned-mass dampers. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics138: 061003.
32.
MaxwellJC (1865) A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Transactions of the Royal Society of London155: 459–512.
33.
McDaidAJMaceBR (2013) A self-tuning electromagnetic vibration absorber with adaptive shunt electronics. Smart Materials and Structures22: 105013.
34.
NakamuraYFukukitaATamuraK, et al. (2014) Seismic response control using electromagnetic inertial mass dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics43: 507–527.
35.
NiederbergerDBehrensSFlemingAJ, et al. (2006) Adaptive electromagnetic shunt damping. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics 200611(1): 103–108.
36.
Palomera-AriasRConnorJJOchsendorfJ (2008) Feasibility study of passive electromagnetic damping systems. Journal of Structural Engineering134(1): 164–170.
37.
SmithMC (2002) Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control47(10): 1648–1662.
38.
SnowdonJC (1968) Vibration and shock in damped mechanical systems. Newyork: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
SodanoHABaeJ-SInmanDJ, et al. (2005) Concept and model of eddy current damper for vibration suppression of a beam. Journal of Sound and Vibration288: 1177–1196.
40.
StabileAAgliettiGRichardsonG, et al. (2017) Design and verification of a negative resistance electromagnetic shunt damper for spacecraft micro-vibration. Journal of Sound Vibration386: 38–49.
41.
TakeyaKSasikiEKobayashiY (2016) Design and parametric study on energy harvesting from bridge vibration using tuned dual-mass damper systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration361: 50–65.
42.
TangXLiuYCuiW, et al. (2016) Analytical solutions to H2 and H∞ optimizations of resonant shunted electromagnetic tuned mass damper and vibration energy harvester. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics138: 011018.
43.
TangXZuoL (2011) Enhanced vibration energy harvesting using dual-mass systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration330: 5199–5209.
44.
ThomasODeüJ-FDucarneJ (2009) Vibration of an elastic structure with shunted piezoelectric patches: efficient finite-element formulation and electromechanical coupling coefficients. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering80(2): 235–268.
45.
ThomasODucarneJDeüJ-F (2012) Performance of piezoelectric shunts for vibration reduction. Smart Materials and Structures21(1): 015008.
46.
ThomasOTouzéCChaigneA (2003) Asymmetric non-linear forced vibrations of free-edge circular plates, part 2: experiments. Journal of Sound and Vibration265(5): 1075–1101.
47.
VakilinejadMGroletAThomasO (2019) A comparison of robustness and performance of linear and non linear lanchester dampers. Nonlinear Dynamics100: 269–287.
48.
YanBWangKHuZ, et al. (2017) Shunt damping vibration control technology: a review. Applied Sciences 7, 494.
49.
YanBZhangXLuoY, et al. (2014) Negative impedance shunted electromagnetic absorber for broadband absorbing: experimental investigation. Smart Materials anf Structures23, 125044.
50.
ZhouSJean-MistralCChesnéS (2019) Electromagnetic shunt damping with negative impedances: optimization and analysis. Journal of Sound and Vibration445: 188–203.
51.
ZhuSShenW-AXuY-L (2012) Linear electromagnetic devices for vibration damping and energy harvesting: modeling and testing. Engineering Structures34: 198–212.
52.
ZhuSShenWQianX (2013) Dynamic analogy between an electromagnetic shunt damper and a tuned mass damper. Smart Materials and Structures22: 115018.
53.
ZuoLChenXNayfehS (2011) Design and analysis of a new type of electromagnetic damper with increased energy density. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics133: 041006.
54.
ZuoLCuiW (2013) Dual-functional energy-harvesting and vibration control : electromagnetic resonant shunt series tuned mass dampers. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics135(5): 051018.
