Inspired by the sensory and autonomous healing processes of living organisms, whether from the Animalia or Plantae biological kingdoms, a microvascular network that undertakes a dual role of sensing structural damage before initiating a triggered healing response has been developed and embedded within an advanced fibre-reinforced composite [−45/90/45/0]2S laminate. In this study, a single vascule is used as a sensing pathway, which detects the introduction of ply delamination and matrix microcracking following a 10-J low-velocity impact event. Once damage connectivity between the sensing vascule and those open to the ambient environment is established, the delivery of a healing agent to the damage zone is triggered. An investigation into a commercially available epoxy healing agent (RT151) and an in-house healing resin formation (diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A/diethylenetriamine) epoxy system has been evaluated. The pressure-assisted delivery of the liquid epoxy healing agent to the damage zone was observed to occur within 49 s across all specimens. The recovery of compression strength post impact was 91% and 94% for the RT151 and diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A healing agents, respectively. This study provides further confirmation on how a bio-inspired vascular healing network could substantially enhance the reliability and robustness of advanced composite materials.
ASTM D7137/D7137M-07 (2007) Compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite materials – test method designation. ASTM International.
2.
ASTM D7136/D7136M-07 (2007) Measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event – test method designation. ASTM International.
3.
BlackALOrlickiJACraigSL (2011) Mechanochemically triggered bond formation in solid-state polymers. Journal of Materials Chemistry21: 8460–8465.
4.
BlaiszikBJKramerSLBOlugebefolaSC. (2010) Self-Healing Polymers and Composites. Annual Review of Materials Research40: 179.
5.
BleaySMLoaderCBHawyesVJ. (2001) A smart repair system for polymer matrix composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing32(12): 1767–1776.
6.
BollerC (2001) Ways and options for aircraft structural health management. Smart Materials and Structures10: 432–440.
7.
BostockRMStermerBA (1989) Perspectives on wound healing in resistance to pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology27: 343–371.
8.
BrownENWhiteSRSottosNR (2005) Retardation and repair of fatigue cracks in a microcapsule toughened epoxy composite – part II: in situ self-healing. Composites Science and Technology65: 2474–2480.
9.
CantwellWJMortonJ (1991) The impact resistance of composite materials – a review. Composites22: 347–362.
CoopeTSMayerUFJWassDF. (2011) Self-healing of an epoxy resin using scandium(III) triflate as a catalytic curing agent. Advanced Functional Materials21: 4624–4631.
12.
DavieEWRatnoffOD (1964) Waterfall sequence for intrinsic blood clotting. Science145(3638): 1310–1312.
13.
DaviesGAOOlssonR (2004) Impact on composite structures. Aeronautical Journal108: 541–563.
14.
DavisDAHamiltonAYangJ. (2009) Force-induced activation of covalent bonds in mechanoresponsive polymeric materials. Nature459: 68–72.
15.
DiamantiKSoutisC (2010) Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures. Progress in Aerospace Sciences46: 342–352.
16.
DryC (1996) Procedures developed for self-repair of polymer matrix composite materials. Composite Structures35: 263–269.
17.
GarciaMELinYSodanoHA (2010) Autonomous materials with controlled toughening and healing. Journal of Applied Physics108: 093512.
18.
HojoMAndoTTanakaM. (2006) Modes I and II interlaminar fracture toughness and fatigue delamination of CF/epoxy laminates with self-same epoxy interleaf. International Journal of Fatigue28: 1154–1165.
19.
HuangC-YTraskRSBondIP (2010) Characterization and analysis of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composite laminates with embedded circular vasculature. Journal of the Royal Society Interface7: 1229–1241.
HurleyDAHustonDR (2011) Coordinated sensing and active repair for self-healing. Smart Materials and Structures20: 025010.
22.
KesslerMR (2007) Self-healing: a new paradigm in materials design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering221(4): 479–495.
23.
KesslerMRWhiteSR (2001) Self-activated healing of delamination damage in woven composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing32: 683–699.
24.
KesslerMRWhiteSRSottosNR (2003) Self-healing structural composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing34: 743–753.
25.
KingsburyCMMayPADavisDA. (2011) Shear activation of mechanophore-crosslinked polymers. Journal of Materials Chemistry21: 8381–8388.
26.
KnipprathCMcCombeGPTraskRS. (2011) A multi-objective genetic algorithm for predicting self-healing strength recovery. Composites Science and Technology72: 752–759.
MinakuchiSTsukamotoHBanshoyaH. (2011) Hierarchical fiber-optic-based sensing system: impact damage monitoring of large-scale CFRP structures. Smart Materials and Structures20: 085029.
33.
NorrisCJBondIPTraskRS (2011a) Interactions between propagating cracks and bioinspired self-healing vascules embedded in glass fibre reinforced composites. Composites Science and Technology71: 847–853.
34.
NorrisCJBondIPTraskRS (2011b) The role of embedded bioinspired vasculature on damage formation in self-healing carbon fibre composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing42: 639–648.
35.
PangJWCBondIP (2005) A hollow fibre reinforced polymer composite encompassing self-healing and enhanced damage visibility. Composites Science and Technology65: 1791–1799.
36.
PatelAJSottosNRWetzelED. (2010) Autonomic healing of low-velocity impact damage in fiber-reinforced composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing41: 360–368.
37.
PrichardJCHoggPJ (1990) The role of impact damage in post-impact compression testing. Composites21: 503–511.
38.
RichardsonMOWWisheartMJ (1996) Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing27: 1123–1131.
39.
Sanchez-SaezSBarberoEZaeraR. (2005) Compression after impact of thin composite laminates. Composites Science and Technology65(13): 1911–1919.
40.
SingerAJClarkRAF (1999) Cutaneous wound healing. New England Journal of Medicine341: 738–746.
41.
SinghAPartridgeIK (1995) Mixed mode fracture in an interleaved carbon-fibre/epoxy composite. Composites Science and Technology55: 319–327.
42.
SuteraSPSkalakR (1993) The history of Poiseuille’s Law. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics25: 1–19.
43.
TraskRSBondIP (2006) Biomimetic self-healing of advanced composite structures using hollow glass fibres. Smart Materials and Structures15(3): 704–710.
44.
TraskRSBondIP (2009) Bioinspired engineering study of Plantae vascules for self-healing composite structures. Journal of the Royal Society Interface7: 921–931.
WilliamsHRTraskRSKnightsAC. (2008) Biomimetic reliability strategies for self-healing vascular networks in engineering materials. Journal of the Royal Society Interface8(5): 735–747.
