Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, an output-only method for extraction of modal macrostrain and damage identification of bridges under ambient excitation is presented. It is theoretically proved that the modal macrostrain within the gauge length of a long-gauge macrostrain sensor is uniquely determined by the peak value of the power spectral density (PSD) of dynamic macrostrain response. Then damage occurred within the gauge length of a sensor can be identified by the ratio change between the peak value of PSD of this sensor response and that of the reference sensor response. The damage extent has also been verified to have corresponding relationship with the ratio change. Numerical simulation was carried out to confirm the feasibility of the proposed method. Analysis results of the numerical simulation reveal that the maximum error of the identified modal macrostrain relative to that of the modal analysis is 3%. Results of simulation show that the proposed PSD-based method can not only accurately localize the damage but also assess the damage extent. The influence of several typical excitations on real bridges was also investigated that further proves the robustness of the method. It is worth mentioning that only the first-order mode is necessary for the method to identify damage. Finally, the proposed method is employed for condition assessment of a real bridge located in New Jersey, wherein 17 long-gauge macrostrain sensors with the gauge length of 1 m were distributedly arranged along the critical region of the girder. Analysis results of the field measurements further verify that the PSD-based method can be utilized to assess the damage state of structures under ambient excitation.

Keywords

damage identification ambient excitation output-only method long-gauge dynamic macrostrain power spectral density real bridge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adewuyi

Serker

NHMK

(2009) Assessment of vibration-based damage identification methods using different measurement techniques. Structural Health Monitoring 8(6): 443–461.

Akaile

(1969) Power spectrum estimation though autogressive model fitting. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 21: 407.

Brincker

Zhang

Andersen

(2000) Modal Identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. Proceedings of IMAC—XVIII: A Conference on Structural Dynamics, 625–630, San Antonio, TX.

Carden

Fanning

(2004) Vibration based condition monitoring: A review. Structural Health Monitoring 3(4): 355–377.

Catbas

Aktan

(2002) Condition and damage assessment: Issues and some promising indices. Journal of Structural Engineering 128(8): 1026–1036.

De Roeck

Peeters

Ren

W-X

(2000) Benchmark study on system identification through ambient vibration measurements. Proceedings of IMAC—XVIII: The 18th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Antonio, TX, 1106–1112.

Doebling

Farrar

Prime

Shevita

(1996) Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review. Los Alamos, NM, National Laboratory Report.

Ewins

(2000) Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application. 2nd edn, London: Research Studies Press Ltd, ISBN: 0863802184.

Fox

CHJ

(1992) The location of defects in structures: A comparison of the use of natural frequency and mode shape data. Proceedings of the 10th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Diego, CA, 522–528.

10.

James

(1994) Extraction of modal parameter from an operating HAWT using the Natural Excitation Technique (NexT). 13th ASME Wind Energy Symposium, New Orleans, LA.

11.

(2007) Development of distributed long-gage fiber optic sensing system for structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring 16: 133–143.

12.

Maia

NMM

Silva

JMM

(1997) Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis. London, England: Research studies press Ltd. and John Wiley & Sons Inc., ISBN, 0863802087.

13.

Osegueda

Dsouza

Qiang

(1992) Damage evaluation of offshore structures using resonant frequency shifts. Proceedings of the 1992 ASMEPVP Conference, ASME, New Orleans, LA, June 22–25, 31–37.

14.

Peeters

De Roeck

Pollet

Schueremans

(1995) Stochastic subspace techniques applied to parameter identification of civil engineering structures. Proceeding of New Advances in Modal Synthesis of Large Structures: Nonlinear, Damped and Nondeterministic Cases, Lyon, France, September, 151–162.

15.

Salawu

(1997) Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: A review. Engineering Structures 19(9): 718–723.

16.

Sohn

Farrar

Hemez

Shunk

Stinemates

Nadler

(2003) A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos, NM, National Laboratory Report, LA-13976-MS.

17.

Stubbs

Kim

Farrar

(1995) Field verification of a non-destructive damage localization and severity estimation algorithm. 13th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), 210–218, Nashville Tennessee USA.

18.

(2007) Two-level damage detection strategy based on modal parameters from distributed dynamic macro-strain measurements. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 18: 667–676.

19.

Xue

S-T

(2005) Two level damage detection in beam structures using modal parameters from distributed dynamic macro-strain measurements. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology (ANCRiSST), Gyeongju, Korea.

Investigation on the damage identification of bridges using distributed long-gauge dynamic macrostrain response under ambient excitation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References