At present much attention is paid to the use of composite rods as alternative reinforcing element of concrete beams, due to their good corrosion resistance. Nevertheless, their elastic behavior, presenting scarce ductility, is a big concern. To overcome this drawback, among various solutions, one involves the use of innovative monitoring systems, to allow continuous structure monitoring. This article is aimed to present a hybrid self-monitoring nanocomposite material able to act as a reinforcing element and sensor in concrete. The sensitive part of such element consists of carbon nanoparticles in epoxy matrix. The monitoring is realized by performing electrical resistance variation measurements under stress. Hence, realized composite material rods were tested both inside and outside concrete and both the cases showed good self-monitoring performance, i.e., possibility to correlate electrical resistance variation to the applied stress.
Bakis, C.E., Nanni, A., Terosky, J.A. and Koehler, S.W.2001. ‘‘Selfmonitoring, Pseudo-ductile, Hybrid FRP Reinforcement Rods Forconcrete Applications,’’Composite Science and Technology, 61:815-823.
2.
Balberg, I.2002. ‘‘A Comprehensive Picture of the Electrical Phenomena in Carbon-black Polymer Composites,’’ Carbon, 40:139-143.
3.
Chung, D.D.L.2001. ‘‘Structural Health Monitoring by Electrical Resistance Measurement,’’ Smart Material Structures , 10:624-636.
4.
Indada, H., Okuhara, H. and Kumagai, H.2005. ‘‘Health Monitoring of Concrete Structure Using Self-diagnosis Materials Sensing Issues,’’ In: Ansari, F. (ed.), Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 239-248.
5.
Jones, K.D. and Di Benedetto, A.T.1994. ‘‘Fiber Fracture in Hybrid Composite System ,’’ Composite Science and Technology, 51:53-62.
6.
Kirkpatrik, S.1973. ‘‘Percolation and Conduction,’’Reviews of Modern Physics, 45(4):574-587.
7.
Kupke, M., Schuler, K. and Schueler, R.2001. ‘‘Non Destructive Testing of FRP by DC and AC Electrical Methods,’’ Composite Science and Technology, 61:837-847.
8.
Merzbacher, C.I., Kersey, A.D. and Friebele, E.J.1996. ‘‘Fiber Optic Sensors in Concrete Structures: A Review,’’ Smart Materials and Structures, 5(2):196-208.
9.
Muto, N., Yanagida, H., Miyayama, M., Nakatsuji, T., Sugita, M. and Otsuka, Y.1992. ‘‘Foreseeing of Fracture in CFGFRP Composites by the Measuring of Residual Change in Electrical Resistance, ’’ Journal of Ceramic Society Japan, 100(4):585-588.
10.
Muto, N., Arai, Y., Shin, S.G., Matsubara, H., Yanagida, H., Sugita, M. and Nakatsuji, T.2001. ‘‘Hybrid Composites with Self-diagnosing Function for Preventing Fatal Fracture,’’ Composites Science and Technology, 61:875-883.
11.
Nanni, A. (ed.) 1993. ‘‘Fiber Reinforced Plastic Reinforcement for Concrete Structures: Properties and Applications,’’Developments in Civil Engineering, Vol. 42, Elsevier, Amsterdam .
12.
Nanni, F., Auricchio, F., Sarchi, F., Forte, G. and Gusmano, G.2006. ‘‘Self-sensing CF-GFRP Rods as Mechanical Reinforcement and Sensors of Concrete Beams,’’ Smart Material Structures, 15:182-186.
13.
Nanni, F., Ruscito, G., Forte, G. and Gusmano, G.2007a. ‘‘Design Manufacture and Testing of Self-sensign Carbon Fibre-glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Rods, ’’ Smart Material Structures, 16:2368-2374.
14.
Nanni, F., Ruscito, G. and Gusmano, G.2007b. ‘‘Assessment of Self-diagnosis Properties of CP-GFRP Nanocomposites for Civil Applications,’’ In: Proceedings of ICCST 6, Sixth International Conference on Composite Science and Technology, Durban, South Africa, January.
15.
Okuhara, Y., Shin, S.G., Matsubara, H., Yanagida, H. and Takeda, T.2000. ‘‘Self-diagnosis Function of FRP Containing Electrically Conductive Phase,’’ In: Proceedings of SPIEs Sensory Phenomena and Measurements Instrumentation for Smart Structures and Materials, pp. 191-198, San Diego, CA, USA.
16.
Okuhara, Y., Shin, S.G., Matsubara, H., Yanagida, H. and Takeda, T.2001. ‘‘Development of Conductive FRP Containing Carbon Phase for Self-diagnosis Structures,’’ In: Proceedings of SPIEs Smart Structures and Materials, pp. 314-322, New Port Beach, CA, USA.
17.
Okuhara, Y., Jang, B.K., Matsubara, H. and Sugita, M.2003. ‘‘Fiber Reinforced Composites as Self-diagnosis Materials for Memorizing Damage Histories,’’ In: Proceedings of SPIEs Smart Structures and Materials, pp. 314-322, San Diego, CA, USA.
18.
Okuhara, Y. and Matsubara, H.2006. ‘‘Memorizing Maximum Strain in Carbon-fiber-reinforced Plastic Composites by Measuring Electrical Resistance under Pre-tensile Load Composites,’’ Science and Technology, 65:2148-2155.
19.
Schueler, R., Shiv, P. and Schulte, K.2001. ‘‘Damage Detection in CFRP by Electrical Conductivity Mapping,’’ Composite Science and Technology, 61:921-930.
20.
Schulte, K. and Baron, C.H.1989. ‘‘Load and Failure Analyses of CFRP Laminates by Means of Electrical Resistivity Measurements, ’’ Computer Science and Technology, 36:63-76.
21.
Schulte, K. and Wittich, H.1995. ‘‘The Eletrical Response of Strained and/or Damaged Polymer Matrix-composite,’’ In: 10th International Conference on Composite Materials, Vol. 5, pp. 349-357, Vancouver.
22.
Yang, C.Q., Wu, Z.S. and Ye, L.P.2006. ‘‘Self-diagnosis of Hybrid CFRP Rods and As-strenghtened Concrete Structures,’’ Journal of Intelligent Materials and Structures, 17:609-618.
23.
You, Y.J., Park, Y.H., Kim, H.Y. and Park, J.S.2007. ‘‘Hybrid Effect on Tensile Properties of FRP Rods with Various Material,’’ Compositions Composite Structures, 80:117-122.
24.
Zhou, Z., Ou, J.B. and Wang, B.2003. ‘‘Smart FBG-OFBG Bars and Their Applications in Reinforced Concrete Beams in Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures,’’ In: Proceedings of the First international Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures, pp. 861-866, Tokyo, Japan.
