This study aimed to determine the current situation regarding cyberbullying and parental supervision and the relationship between positive parental involvement and various variables. Data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results revealed a relationship between parental supervision in cyberbullying prevention (PSCP) and digital parenting awareness, active mediation, content-specific restrictive interventions, and supervision. In elementary schools, co-use and content-specific restrictions are statistically significant predictors of parental supervision. In contrast, active mediation and parental role were statistically significant predictors for middle- and high-school students. Moreover, the effect of digital parenting awareness on supervision was statistically significant for both groups. For parents under 45 years of age, content-focused restrictions and digital parenting awareness were effective, whereas no effect was observed in those aged 45 years or above. Active mediation was effective in both age groups.
AhernN. R.KemppainenJ.ThackerP. (2016). Awareness and knowledge of child and adolescent risky behaviors: A parent’s perspective. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 29, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12129
2.
AkkayaS.BurcuG. S.KapidereM. (2021). Examining the relationship between multidimensional parenting styles and digital parenting awareness levels of parents. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(4), 546–573. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i4.6132
3.
AltunaJ.Martínez-de-MorentinJ. I.LarekiA. (2020). The impact of becoming a parent about the perception of internet risk behaviors. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, Article 104803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104803
4.
AoyamaI.Barnard-BrakL.TalbertT. L. (2011). Cyberbullying among high school students: Cluster analysis of sex and age differences and the level of parental monitoring. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 1(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2011010103
5.
Atman-UsluN.Yildiz DurakH. (2022). Parental awareness and supervision to prevent cyberbullying: Scale adaptation and a review in terms of demographic variables. Children and Youth Services Review, 133, Article 106329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106329
6.
BaiQ.HuangS.HsuehF. H.ZhangT. (2021). Cyberbullying victimization and suicide ideation: A crumbled belief in a just world. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, Article 106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106679
7.
BaidenP.StewartS. L.FallonB. (2017). The mediating effect of depressive symptoms on the relationship between bullying victimization and non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: Findings from community and inpatient mental health settings in Ontario, Canada. Psychiatry Research, 255, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.018
8.
BaldryA. C.FarringtonD. P. (2000). Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 10(1), 17–31.
9.
BaldryA. C.SorrentinoA.FarringtonD. P. (2019). Cyberbullying and cybervictimization versus parental supervision, monitoring and control of adolescents’ online activities. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.058
10.
BaumanS. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 803–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609350927
11.
BradshawC. P. (2014). The role of families in preventing and buffering the effects of bullying. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, 168(11), 991–993. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1627
12.
CassidyW.BrownK.JacksonM. (2012). “Making kind cool”: Parents’ suggestions for preventing cyber bullying and fostering cyber kindness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.4.f
13.
CekaA.MuratiR. (2016). The role of parents in the education of children. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(5), 61–64.
14.
ChenL.HoS. S.LwinM. O. (2017). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1194–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634037
15.
ChenL.LiuX.TangH. (2023). The interactive effects of parental mediation strategies in preventing cyberbullying on social media. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1009–1022. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S386968
16.
ChunJ.LeeJ.KimJ.LeeS. (2020). An international systematic review of cyberbullying measurements. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, Article 106485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106485
17.
CollierK. M.CoyneS. M.RasmussenE. E.HawkinsA. J.Padilla-WalkerL. M.EricksonS. E.Memmott-ElisonM. K. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 798–812.
18.
DugganM.LenhartA.LampeC.EllisonN. B. (2015). Parents and social media. Pew Research Center, 16(1), Article 2.
19.
DurakA.KayginH. (2020). Parental mediation of young children’s internet use: Adaptation of parental mediation scale and review of parental mediation based on the demographic variables and digital data security awareness. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2275–2296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10079-1
20.
ElsaesserC.RussellB.OhannessianC. M.PattonD. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004
21.
EroğluY. (2014). Holistic Model Determining Risk Factors Which Predict Cyber Bullying and Victimization in Adolescents [PhD Thesis]. Uludağ University, Turkey.
22.
FlorosG. D.SiomosK. E.FisounV.DafouliE.GeroukalisD. (2013). Adolescent online cyberbullying in Greece: The impact of parental online security practices, bonding, and online impulsiveness. Journal of School Health, 83(6), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12049
23.
FoodyM.McGuireL.KuldasS.O’Higgins NormanJ. (2019). Friendship quality and gender differences in association with cyberbullying involvement and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01723
24.
FuX.LiuJ.LiuR. D.DingY.HongW.JiangS. (2020). The impact of parental active mediation on adolescent mobile phone dependency: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, Article 106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106280
25.
GavazziS. (2013). Theory and research pertaining to families with adolescents. In PetersonG.BushK. (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 303–327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_14
26.
HairJ.HollingsworthC. L.RandolphA. B.ChongA. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458.
27.
HeimanT.Olenik-ShemeshD. (2015). Cyberbullying experience and gender differences among adolescents in different educational settings. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413492855
28.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SinkovicsR. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In SinkovicsR. R.GhauriP. N. (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (pp. 277–320). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
29.
HsiehY. P. (2020). Parental psychological control and adolescent cyberbullying victimisation and perpetration: The mediating roles of avoidance motivation and revenge motivation. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 30(3), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2020.1776153
30.
HuangG.LiX.ChenW.StraubhaarJ. D. (2018). Fall-behind parents? The influential factors on digital parenting self-efficacy in disadvantaged communities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1186–1206.
HutsonE.KellyS.ve MilitelloL. K. (2018). Systematic review of cyberbullying interventions for youth and parents with implications for evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12257
33.
İnan-KayaG. A. M. Z. E.Mutlu-BayraktarD.YılmazÖ. (2018). Digital parenting: Perceptions on digital risks. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2018.96
34.
KagitcibasiC. (2017). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications. Routledge.
35.
KatzI.LemishD.CohenR.ArdenA. (2019). When parents are inconsistent: Parenting style and adolescents’ involvement in cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescence, 74, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.04.006
36.
KonokV.BunfordN.MiklósiÁ. (2020). Associations between child mobile use and digital parenting style in Hungarian families. Journal of Children and Media, 14(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1684332
37.
KowalskiR. M.GiumettiG. W.SchroederA. N.LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
LiQ. (2009). Cyberbullying in schools: An examination of preservice teachers’ perception. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la Technologie, 34(2), Article 21432.
LivingstoneS.HelsperE. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
42.
ManapA.DurmuşE. (2020). Development of digital parental awareness scale. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(2), 978–993. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.711101
43.
Martín-CriadoJ. M.CasasJ. A.Ortega-RuizR. (2021a). Parental supervision: Predictive variables of positive involvement in cyberbullying prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), Article 1562. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041562
44.
Martín-CriadoJ. M.CasasJ. A.Ortega-RuizR.Del ReyR. (2021b). Parental supervision and victims of cyberbullying: Influence of the use of social networks and online extimacy. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.)26(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.04.002
45.
MartínezI.MurguiS.GarciaO. F.GarciaF. (2019). Parenting in the digital era: Protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.036
46.
McHughM. C.HowardD. E. (2017). Friendship at any cost: Parent perspectives on cyberbullying children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(4), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2017.1299268
47.
MeeusA.EggermontS.BeullensK. (2019). Constantly connected: The role of parental mediation styles and self-regulation in pre- and early adolescents’ problematic mobile device use. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy015
48.
MeschG. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0068
49.
MidambaN.MorenoM. (2019). Differences in parent and adolescent views on cyberbullying in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 13(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1544159
50.
MishnaF.SandersJ. E.McNeilS.FearingG.KalenteridisK. (2020). “If somebody is different”: A critical analysis of parent, teacher and student perspectives on bullying and cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, Article 105366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105366
51.
ModeckiK. L.MinchinJ.HarbaughA. G.GuerraN. G.RunionsK. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
52.
NappaM. R.PalladinoB. E.NocentiniA.MenesiniE. (2020). Do the face-to-face actions of adults have an online impact? The effects of parent and teacher responses on cyberbullying among students. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1860746
53.
NathansonA. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002002
54.
NavarroR.SernaC.MartínezV.Ruiz-OlivaR. (2013). The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0137-2
55.
NikkenP. (2019). Parents’ instrumental use of media in child rearing: Relationships with confidence in parenting, and health and conduct problems in children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(2), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1281-3
56.
NikkenP.JanszJ. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038
57.
NikkenP.ScholsM. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4
58.
NocentiniA.FiorentiniG.Di PaolaL.MenesiniE. (2019). Parents, family characteristics and bullying behavior: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.010
59.
PatchinJ. W.HindujaS. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288
60.
RaczS. J.JohnsonS. L.BradshawC. P.ChengT. L. (2017). Parenting in the digital age: Urban black youth’s perceptions about technology-based communication with parents. Journal of Family Studies, 23(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2015.1108858
61.
RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449
SawyerJ. L.MishnaF.PeplerD.WienerJ. (2011). The missing voice: Parents’ perspectives of bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10), 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.05.010
64.
SelkieE. M.FalesJ. L.MorenoM. A. (2016). Cyberbullying prevalence among U.S. middle and high school-aged adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.026
65.
SmithP. K. (2019). Research on cyberbullying: strengths and limitations. In VandeboschH.GreenL. (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 9–27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04960-7_2
66.
SongH.LeeY.KimJ. (2020). Gender differences in the link between cyberbullying and parental supervision trajectories. Crime & Delinquency, 66(3), 1914–1936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720912371
67.
SwearerS. M.HymelS. (2015). Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis–stress model. American Psychologist, 70(4), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038929
68.
VargünG.KızıltepeR. (2023). Familial and individual factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: Parenting attitudes and reactive-proactive aggression. Turkish Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 30(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcamh.galenos.2022.26818
69.
VezneR.Atman UsluN.Yildiz DurakH. (2023). Modeling of variables related to parents’ awareness in cyberbullying prevention. Current Psychology, 42(32), 28579–28596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03837-x
70.
WangJ.IannottiR. J.NanselT. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375.
71.
WongY. C. (2010). Cyber-parenting: Internet benefits, risks and parenting issues. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28(4), 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2011.562629
72.
WrightM. F. (2017). Parental mediation, cyberbullying, and cybertrolling: The role of gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.059
73.
YaffeY. (2017). Development and validation of a new parental authority instrument (PAI). North American Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 169–193.
74.
YaffeY. (2023). Systematic review of the differences between mothers and fathers in parenting styles and practices. Current Psychology, 42(19), 16011–16024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01014-6
75.
YangB.WangB.SunN.XuF.WangL.ChenJ.YuS.ZhangY.ZhuY.DaiT.ZhangQ.SunC. (2021). The consequences of cyberbullying and traditional bullying victimization among adolescents: Gender differences in psychological symptoms, self-harm and suicidality. Psychiatry Research, 306, Article 114219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114219
76.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J.WolakJ.FinkelhorD. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118(4), e1169–e1177. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0815
77.
Yildiz DurakH. (2018). What would you do without your smartphone? Adolescents’ social media usage, locus of control, and loneliness as a predictor of nomophobia. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.2.0025
78.
Yildiz DurakH. (2019a). Human factors and cybersecurity in online game addiction: An analysis of the relationship between high school students’ online game addiction and the state of providing personal cybersecurity and representing cyber human values in online games. Social Science Quarterly, 100(6), 1984–1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12693
79.
Yildiz DurakH. (2019b). Investigation of nomophobia and smartphone addiction predictors among adolescents in Turkey: Demographic variables and academic performance. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 492–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.003
80.
Yildiz DurakH.AvciÜ. (2023). Modeling the factors related to sensibility in cyberbullying of university students. Current Psychology, 42(32), 28356–28367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03832-2
81.
Yildiz DurakH.SaritepeciM. (2020). Examination of the relationship between cyberbullying and cyber victimization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(10), 2905–2915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01768-4
82.
YokotaniK.TakanoM. (2021). Social contagion of cyberbullying via online perpetrator and victim networks. Computers in Human Behavior, Article119, Article 106719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106719
83.
YoungK.GovenderC. (2018). A comparison of gender, age, grade, and experiences of authoritarian parenting amongst traditional and cyberbullying perpetrators. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), s1–s11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38ns1a1519
ZychI.Ortega-RuizR.Del ReyR. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001
