The Relationships Among Parent Involvement,Student Self-Determination,and Postsecondary Education Enrollment for Students With Learning Disabilities

Abstract

In light of the lower rates of postsecondary education enrollment by students with learning disabilities (LD), researchers have sought to identify predictors of enrollment so that improvement efforts can target specific predictors. Taking advantage of the rich data provided in the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, we conducted a secondary data analysis to investigate how parent involvement and student self-determination predict postsecondary education enrollment for students with LD. Findings from structural equation modeling analyses showed that parent involvement and student self-determination predict postsecondary education enrollment, and the influence of parent involvement is mediated by student self-determination. These results suggest that parents play an essential role in the secondary transition process, and schools need to make concerted efforts to work with parents to foster student self-determination, which ultimately promotes students’ participation in postsecondary education.

Keywords

parent involvement self-determination postsecondary education enrollment learning disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berry

H. G.

Ward

Caplan

(2012). Self-determination and access to postsecondary education in transitioning youths receiving supplemental security income benefits. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional, 35(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728811422230

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guildford Press.

Burghardt

Haimson

Liu

A. Y.

Lipscomb

Potter

Waits

Wang

(2017). National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 design documentation (NCEE 2017-4021). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Cameto

Levine

Wagner

(2004). Transition planning for students with disabilities. SRI International. http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2004_11/index.html

Chin

W. W.

(1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249674

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

deFur

S. H.

Todd-Allen

 Getzel

E. E.

(2001). Parent participation in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880102400103

Doren

 Gau

Lindstrom

(2012). The relationship between parent expectations and postschool outcomes of adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 79(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207900101

Doren

Murray

Gau

J. M.

(2014). Salient predictors of school dropout among secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29(4), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12044

10.

Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177.

11.

Field

A. P.

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE.

12.

Fleming

A. R.

Fairweather

J. S.

(2012). The role of postsecondary education in the path from high school to work for youth with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355211423303

13.

Gross

Francis

Gage

(2021). Family employment awareness training (FEAT): A research-based program for promoting high expectations for employment and knowledge of resources. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ODEP/pdf/SSI_Youth_Gross_Final_Proposal.pdf

14.

Hicks

T. a.

Knollman

G. A.

(2015). Secondary analysis of National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 Data: A statistical review. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414528240

15.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

16.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

17.

Kline

R. B.

(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

18.

Landmark

Zhang

(2013). Compliance and practices in transition planning: A review of individualized education program documents. Remedial and Special Education, 34(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511431831

19.

Landmark

L. J.

Roberts

E. L.

Zhang

(2013). Educators’ beliefs, and practices about parent involvement in transition planning. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412463047

20.

Lee

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

(2015). Effect of instruction with the self-determined learning model of instruction on students with disabilities: A meta-analysis. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(2), 237–247. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827538

21.

Lipscomb

Haimson

Liu

A. Y.

Burghardt

Johnson

D. R.

Thurlow

M. L.

(2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 1: Comparisons with other youth: Full report (NCEE 2017-4016). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluation/disabilities_nlts2012.asp

22.

Little

R. J. A.

Rubin

D. B.

(2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Wiley.

23.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

24.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Sinclair

Poppen

(2015). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analysis. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047

25.

McFarland

Hussar

Wang

Zhang

Wang

Rathbun

Barmer

Forrest Cataldi

Bullock Mann

(2018). The condition of education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). U.S. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144

26.

Morningstar

M. E.

Frey

B. B.

Noonan

P. M.

Clavenna-Deane

Graves

Wade

D. B.

(2010). A preliminary investigation of the relationship of transition preparation and self-determination for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809356568

27.

Muthén

B. O.

du Toit

S. H. C.

Spisic

(1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. https://www.statmodel.com/download/Article_075.pdf

28.

Newman

(2005). Family involvement in the educational development of youth with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489979.pdf

29.

Newman

Wagner

Knokey

A.-M.

Marder

Nagle

Shaver

Wei

(2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). National Center for Special Education Research. https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20113005/pdf/20113005.pdf

30.

Newman

L. A.

Madaus

J. W.

Lalor

A. R.

Javitz

H. S.

(2019). Support receipt: Effect on postsecondary success of students with learning disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418811288

31.

No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). P. L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.

32.

Petcu

S. D.

Horn

M. L. V.

Shogren

K. A.

(2016). Self-determination and the enrollment in and completion of postsecondary education for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416670135

33.

Reiter

J. P.

Raghunathan

T. E.

Kinney

(2006). The importance of the sampling design in multiple imputation for missing data. Survey Methodology, 32(2), 143–150.

34.

Rosseel

(2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

35.

Rowe

D. A.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Fowler

C. H.

Test

D. W.

Mitchell

V. J.

Clark

K. A.

Holzberg

Owens

T. L.

Rusher

Seaman-Tullis

R. L.

Gushanas

C. M.

Castle

Chang

Voggt

Kwiatek

Dean

(2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence- and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674

36.

Shogren

K. A.

Garnier-Villarreal

(2015). Developing student, family, and school constructs from NTLS2 Data. Journal of Special Education, 49(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913513336

37.

Shogren

K. A.

Garnier-Villarreal

Lang

Seo

(2016). Mediating role of self-determination constructs in explaining the relationship between school factors and postschool outcomes. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916660089

38.

Shogren

K. A.

Palmer

S. B.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Williams-Diehm

Little

T. D.

(2012). Effect of intervention with the self-determined learning model of instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial & Special Education, 33(5), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410072

39.

Shogren

K. A.

Ward

M. J.

(2018). Promoting and enhancing self-determination to improve the post-school outcomes of people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3233.JVR-180935

40.

Shogren

K. A.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Rifenbark

G. G.

Little

T. D.

(2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733

41.

Smith

F. A.

Grigal

Sulewski

(2012). The impact of postsecondary education on employment outcomes for transition-age youth with and without disabilities: A secondary analysis of American community survey data. Institute for Community Inclusion. https://thinkcollege.net/sites/default/files/files/resources/Insight_15_D2.pdf

42.

SRI International. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study II (NLTS2): Study design, timeline, and data collection plan. http://www.nlts2.org/studymeth/nlts2_design_timeline.pdf

43.

Trainor

A. A.

Morningstar

M. E.

Murray

(2016). Characteristics of transition planning and services for students with high incidence disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 39(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715607348

44.

U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2010). Free appropriate public education for students with disabilities: Requirements under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Author.

45.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities?. In Sands

D. J.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15–34). Paul H. Brookes.

46.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2000). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale: Procedural guidelines (Revised ed.). The Arc of the United States.

47.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Abery

Mithaug

D. E.

Stancliffe

(2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Charles C Thomas Publisher.

48.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

(2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879591

49.

Novak

J. A.

Lavery

M. R.

Vostal

B. R.

Matuga

J. M.

(2018). Predicting college completion among students with learning disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417750093

50.

Zeng

Hord

(2022). Parental influences on student self-determination: Perspectives of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487221107890

51.

Zheng

Erickson

A. G.

Kingston

N. M.

Noonan

P. M.

(2014). The relationship among self-determination, self-concept, and academic achievement for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(5), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412469688