Parent involvement is a cornerstone of special education policy and best practice. Parents of students with disabilities participate in school events in a manner similar to parents of students without disabilities, and the benefits of parent involvement are widely recognized for all students. Recent legislation and federal funding opportunities have targeted parent outreach programs as an area of improvement for schools. Using data from the Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study, this study examined the effect of school-initiated parent outreach activities on parent involvement in school. Parents reported greater involvement in schools that offered a greater number of outreach activities. Parent involvement was lower for older students, non-Caucasian students, students from non-two-parent households, and students from lower income households, and these lower participation rates were not differentially higher in schools that offered a greater number of parent outreach activities. Patterns and trends of parent involvement and school-initiated outreach programs are discussed, with suggestions for practitioners and future research.
AndrewsJ. A.DuncanS. C. (1997). Examining the reciprocal relation between academic motivation and substance use: Effects of family relationships, self-esteem, and general deviance. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 523–549.
2.
AunolaK.StattinH.NurmiJ. E. (2000). Adolescents’ achievement strategies, school adjustment, and externalizing and internalizing problem behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 289–306.
3.
BarberB. K.OlsenJ. A. (2003). Assessing transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 3–30. doi:10.1177/0743558403258113
4.
BerendsM. (1995). Educational stratification and students’ social bonding to school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16, 327–351. doi:10.1080/0142569950160304
5.
BlackorbyJ.KnokeyA.WagnerM.LevineP.SchillerE.SumiC. (2007). SEELS: What makes a difference? Influences on outcomes for students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.seels.net/designdocs/SEELS_W1W3_FINAL.pdf
6.
BrodyG. H.FlorD. L. (1998). Maternal resources, parenting practices, and child competence in rural, single-parent African American families. Child Development, 69, 803–816. doi:10.2307/1132205
7.
CalderonR. (2000). Parental involvement in deaf children’s education programs as a predictor of child’s language, early reading, and social-emotional development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 140–155.
8.
CarterR. S.WojtkiewiczR. A. (2000). Parental involvement with adolescents’ education: Do daughters or sons get more help?Adolescence, 35, 29–44.
9.
CatsambisS. (2001). Expanding knowledge of parental involvement in children’s secondary education: Connections with high school seniors’ academic success. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 149–177.
10.
Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2010). Growing and sustaining parent engagement: A toolkit for parents and community partners. Washington, DC: Author.
11.
de CarvalhoM. E. (2001). Rethinking family school relations: A critique of parental involvement in schooling. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
12.
DesimoneL. (1999). Linking parent involvement with student achievement: Do race and income matter?Journal of Educational Research, 93, 11–30.
13.
DownsA. (2001). It’s all in the family: Middle schools share the secrets of parent engagement. Middle Ground, 4, 10–15.
14.
DuchnowskiA. J.KutashK. (2011). School reform and mental health services for students with emotional disturbances educated in urban schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(3), 323–346.
15.
ElbaumB. (2009, November24). Achieving better results on indicator B-8: Schools’ facilitation of parent involvement [Data Accountability Center Webinar on B-8]. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/Docs/B-8Presentation_Elbaum.ppt
16.
Elish-PiperL. (2008). Parent involvement in reading. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 36, 44–50.
17.
FanX.ChenM. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.
18.
FlynnG.NolanB. (2008). What do school principals think about current school-family relationships?NASSP Bulletin, 92, 173–190. doi:10.1177/0192636508322663
19.
Gonzalez-DeHassA. R.WillemsP. P. (2003). Underutilization of parent involvement. School Community Journal, 13, 85–100.
20.
GreenC. L.WalkerJ. M. T.Hoover-DempseyK. V.SandlerH. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532–544. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.532
21.
GutmanL. M.MidgleyC. (2000). The role of protective factors in supporting the academic achievement of poor African American students during the middle school transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 223–248.
22.
HaynesN. M.ComerJ. P.Hamilton-LeeM. (1989). The effects of parental involvement on student performance. Educational and Psychological Research, 8, 291–299.
23.
HillN. E.CraftS. A. (2003). Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 74–83. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.74
24.
Hoover-DempseyK.SandlerH. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education?Review of Educational Research, 67, 3–42.
25.
Ho Sui-ChuE.WillmsJ. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126–141.
26.
HoxJ. J.MaasC. J. M. (2002). Sample sizes for multilevel modeling. In BlasiusJ.HoxJ.de LeeuwE.SchmidtP. (Eds.), Social science methodology in the new millennium. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology (2nd. exp. ed., pp. 5-6) Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich Verlag.
27.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400. (2004).
28.
JohnstonJ. H. (1998). Family involvement models in middle schools. In FullerM. L.OlsenG. (Eds.), Home-school relations: Working successfully with parents and families (pp. 191–207). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
JordanC.OrozcoE.AverettA. (2001). Emerging issues in school, family, and community connections. Austin, TX: National Center for Family and Community Connections with Schools.
30.
KishL. (1965). Survey sampling. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
MappK. L. (2003). Having their say: Parents describe why and how they are engaged in children’s learning. School Community Journal, 13, 35–64.
32.
MbwanaK.TerzianM.MooreK. A. (2009). What works for parent involvement programs for children: Lessons from experimental evaluations of social interventions (Research Report No. 2009-47). Washington, DC: Child Trends.
MiedelW. T.ReynoldsA. J. (1999). Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantaged children: Does it matter?Journal of School Psychology, 37, 379–402.
35.
MoY.SinghK. (2008). Parents’ relationships and involvement: Effects on students’ school engagement and performance. Research in Middle Level Education, 31, 1–11.
36.
MuthénB.SatorraA. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316.
37.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
38.
NewmanL. (2005). Family involvement in the educational development of youth with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
SandersM. G.HertingJ. R. (2000). Gender and the effects of school, family, and church support on the academic achievement of African-American urban adolescents. In SandersM.G. (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk: Research, policy, and practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents (pp. 141–161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Simons-MortonB.ChenR. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41, 3–25. doi:10.1177/0044118X09334861
43.
SirinS. R.Rogers-SirinL. (2004). Exploring school engagement of middle-class African-American adolescents. Youth & Society, 35, 323–340. doi:10.1177/0044118X03255006
44.
SmithJ. G. (2006). Parental involvement in education among low-income families: A case study. School Community Journal, 16, 43–56.
45.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. (2010). SPSS for Windows (Version 18.0). New York, NY: Author.
46.
SRI International. (2005). SEELS data documentation and dictionary: Database structure. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
47.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Status and trends in the education of blacks. (NCES Publication No. 2003-034). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003034.pdf
48.
WagnerM.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.EpsteinM. H. (2005). The Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study and the National Longitudinal Transition Study: Study designs and implications for youth with emotional disturbance. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 25–41. doi: 10.1177/10634266050130010301
49.
WagnerM.MarderC.BlackorbyJ.CardosoD. (2002). The children we serve: The demographic characteristics of elementary and middle school students with disabilities and their households. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
50.
ZhangD.HsuH. Y.KwokO.BenzM. R.Bowman-PerrottL. (in press). The impact of basic-level parent engagements on student achievement: Patterns associated with race/ethnicity and SES. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 28–39.
