Challenges in Interpreting Accountability Results for Schools’ Facilitation of Parent Involvement Under IDEA

Abstract

Parents’ involvement in their child’s education has been an important tenet of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Under the special education accountability system that went into effect in 2005, states have been required to report annually to the federal government on the percentage of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement. This study investigated the variability of states’ reported results owing to states’ different choices with regard to items, metrics, and standards used to calculate their percentage on the indicator. Findings indicated that the application of different methodologies could result in reported percentages that vary by as much as 40 percentage points. It is argued that when reported results do not mean the same thing across states, the accountability system may fail in its mission to provide stakeholders with clear information to evaluate program performance and guide improvement efforts.

Keywords

parent involvement accountability policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrich

(1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.

Bond

Fox

(2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cox

D. D.

(2005). Evidence-based interventions using home-school collaboration. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 473–497.

Cronin

Dahlin

Xiang

McCahon

(2009). The accountability illusion. Retrieved from Thomas B. Fordham Institute website: http://www.edexcellencemedia.net/publications/2009/200902_accountabilityillusion/2009_AccountabilityIllusion_WholeReport.pdf

Desforges

Abouchaar

(2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustment: A literature review (Research Report No. 433). Retrieved from Birmingham Grid for Learning website: https://bgfl.org/bgfl/custom/files_uploaded/uploaded_resources/18617/Desforges.pdf

Elbaum

Fisher

W. P.

Jr Coulter

W. A.

(2011). Measuring schools’ efforts to partner with parents of children served under IDEA: Scaling and standard setting for accountability reporting. Journal of Applied Measurement, 12, 261–278.

Fan

Chen

(2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.

Fishel

Ramirez

(2005). Evidence-based parent involvement interventions with school-aged children. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 371–402.

Guli

L. A.

(2005). Evidence-based parent consultation with school-related outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 455–472.

10.

Henderson

A. T.

Mapp

K. L.

(2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

11.

Hoard

Shepard

K. N.

(2005). Parent education as parent-centered prevention: A review of school-related outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 434–454.

12.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004. P.L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647.

13.

Jeynes

W. H.

(2005). A meta-analysis of relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237–269.

14.

Jeynes

W. H.

(2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82–109.

15.

Knowles

E. S.

Nathan

K. T.

(1997). Acquiescent responding in self-reports: Cognitive style or social concern. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 293–301.

16.

Krosnick

J. A.

(1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567.

17.

Linacre

J. M.

(2009). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS Rasch-model computer program, v.3.68.1. Chicago, IL: WINSTEPS.com.

18.

Meisenberg

Williams

(2008). Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education? Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1539–1550.

19.

National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring. (2006). Frequently asked questions concerning the NCSEAM parent/family scales in relation to SPP reporting requirements for Part B Indicator #8 and Part C Indicator #4: December 2006. Retrieved from Accountabilitydata.org website: http://accountabilitydata.org/ParentFamily%20Involvement%20Measures/Frequently%20Asked%20Questions%20Concerning%20the%20NCSEAM%20Parent.pdf

20.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Retrieved from Common Core State Standards Initiative website: http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards

21.

National Research Council. (2011). The importance of common metrics for advancing social science theory and research: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

22.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq.

23.

Office of Special Education Programs. (2008). Part B SPP/APR 2008 indicator analyses (FFY 2006-2007). Retrieved from http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/450

24.

Office of Special Education Programs. (2009). Part B SPP/APR 2009 indicator analyses (FFY 2007-2008). Retrieved from The Right IDEA: IDEA Technical Assistance and Guidance website: http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/629

25.

Office of Special Education Programs. (2010). Part B SPP/APR 2010 indicator analyses (FFY 2008-2009). Retrieved from http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/1684

26.

Office of Special Education Programs. (2011). Part B SPP/APR 2011 Indicator analyses (FFY 2009-2010). Retrieved from National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center website: http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/sec619/part-b_sppapr_11.pdf

27.

Office of Special Education Programs. (2012). Results-driven accountability in special education: Summary—4-5-12. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education website: www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/rda-qa.doc

28.

Pomerantz

E. M.

Moorman

E. A.

Litwack

S. D.

(2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373–410.

29.

Rasch

(1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Reprint, with Foreword and Afterword by B.D. Wright, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.

30.

Swanson

C. B.

(2004). Graduation rates: Real kids, real numbers. Retrieved from The Urban Institute/Education Policy Center website: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311114_grad_rates.pdf

31.

Transforming IT. (2012). Driving accountability & behavioral change through metrics. Retrieved from Transforming ITwebsite: http://transforming-it.castlepointe.com/2010/11/driving-accountability-behavioral-change-through-metrics.html

32.

U.S. Department of Education. (2008). A uniform, comparable graduation rate: How the final regulations for Title I hold schools, districts, and states accountable for improving graduation rates. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education website: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/reg/proposal/uniform-grad-rate.html

33.

Wright

B. D.

Masters

G. N.

(1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.

34.

Zellman

G. L.

Waterman

J. M.

(1998). Understanding the impact of parent school involvement on children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 370–380.

35.

Zhang

Hsu

H.-Y.

Kwok

Benz

Bowman-Perrott. (2011). The impact of basic-level parent engagements on student achievement: Patterns associated with race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 28–39. doi:10.1177/1044207310394447