The government of the United Kingdom has two top educational policy priorities: ensuring that education is as socially inclusive as possible within mainstream schools and raising students' educational attainment standards. In this study, the author explores a continuing tension between government aspirations as represented by the government's policy concerning the education of disaffected and frequently disruptive students (macro level) and an educational provision intended to address these students' needs in one urban secondary school (micro level). Such students are typically deemed to have special educational needs (SEN), and each school is responsible for identifying and addressing them. Excluding a student from school is widely viewed as the ultimate sanction. The effects of a government policy that encourages inclusion and minimizes exclusion is the focus of this research. In this article, the study is discussed in two parts. In the first part, the author summarizes the challenges presented by the presence of disaffected pupils attending secondary schools in England. In the second part, the author looks at eight students attending a learning support unit established within 1 school to help minimize exclusion. The locus-of-control beliefs of these students; their views concerning three selected “core” subjects in the curriculum; and their attendance before joining the unit, while attending it, and at follow-up are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainscow, M. (2000). The next step for special education: Supporting the development of inclusive practices. British Journal of Special Education, 27, 2, 76—80.
2.
Alban-Metcalfe, J., & Alban-Metcalfe, J. (2001). Managing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the inclusive classroom. London : Fulton.
3.
Blair, M. (2001). Race and ethnicity in school exclusions: The role of the head-teacher. Curriculum Journal, 12, 331—345.
4.
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (Rev. ed.). Bristol, England: Centre for Studies on InclusiveEducation.
5.
Booth, T., Ainscow, M., Black-Hawkins, K., Vaughan, M., & Shaw, L. (2000). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol, England: Centre for Studies on InclusiveEducation.
6.
Burton, C., & Kratz, M. (1990). Predicting adjustment in middle childhood from early peer status. Early Child Development and Care, 60, 89—100.
7.
Carrington, S., & Elkins, J. (2002) Bridging the gap between inclusive policy and inclusive culture in secondary schools. Support for Learning, 17(2), 51—57.
8.
Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. ( 2002). Assessments and statements: CSIE Summary. Bristol, England: Author.
9.
Chan, S., & Mpofu, E. (2001). Children's peer status in school settings: Current and prospective assessment procedures. School Psychological International,22(1), 43—52.
10.
Cooper, P., & Bilton, K. (2002). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A practical guide for teachers (2nd ed.). London: Fulton.
11.
Department for Education and Employment. ( 1998). Meeting SEN: A programme of action. London: Author.
12.
Department for Education and Employment. ( 1999). Social inclusion: The LEA role in pupil support (Circular 11/99). London: Author.
13.
Department for Education and Employment. ( 2000a). Influence or irrelevance: Can social science improve government? (Secretary of State's Lecture Speech to the Economic and Social Research Council, February, 2, 2000 ).
14.
Department for Education and Employment. ( 2000b). National curriculum 2000. London : Author.
15.
Department for Education and Skills. (2001 a). Special educational needs code of practice. London: Author.
16.
Department for Education and Skills. (2001 b). Permanent exclusions from schools, England 1999/2000 (SFR 32/2001). London: Author.
17.
Department for Education and Skills. (2001 c). Statistics for education: Pupil absence and truancy in England, 2000/2001. London: Author .
18.
Department for Education and Skills. (2002 a). Permanent exclusions from schools and exclusion appeals, England 2000/2001 (Provisional). (SFR 10/2002). London : Author.
19.
Department for Education and Skills. (2002 b). Performance tables for school absence in Worcestershire (2001). Retrieved from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/cgi-bin/performancetables/dfe1
20.
Department for Education and Skills. (2002 c). Planning, teaching and assessing the curriculum for pupils with learning difficulties. Retrieved from http://www.nc.uk/id/En_content.html
21.
Department of Health. (1989). The children act. London: Her Majesty's Office.
22.
Dweck, C.S. (2000) Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. London: Psychology Press & Taylor and Francis.
23.
Dyson, A., Gallannaugh, F., & Millward, A. (2002, September). Making space in the standards agenda: Developing inclusive practices in school. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
24.
Elliott, J.C. (1996). Locus of control in behaviourally disordered children . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(1), 47—57.
25.
Elliott, J.C. (1997). Locus of control, personal control and the counselling of children with learning and/or behavioural problems. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 25(1), 27—47.
26.
Elsea, M. (1999). Attributional styles in boys with severe behaviour problems: A possible reason for lack of progress in a positive behaviour programme . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 33—45.
27.
England, J., & Brown, J. (2001). Inclusion, exclusion and marginalisation. Educational Action Research, 9, 355—370.
28.
Fabian, H. (2000). Small steps to starting school. International Journal ofEarly Years, 8, 141—153.
29.
Fabian, H. (2002). Children starting school: A guide to successful transition and transfers for teachers and assistants. London: Fulton.
30.
Frederickson, N., & Cline, T. (2002) Special educational needs: Inclusion and diversity—A textbook. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
31.
Ghaye, A., & Wakefield, P. (1994). Resilient schools: Explaining attributes . . . celebrating success. PrimaryLife, 2(2), 27—32.
32.
Gordon, A. (2001). School exclusions in England: Children's voices and adult solutions?Educational Studies, 27(1), 69—85.
33.
Hallam, S., & Castle, F. (2001). Exclusion for school: What can help prevent it?Educational Review, 53, 169—179.
34.
Hallam, S., Ireson, J., & Hurley, C. (2002, November). Ability grouping in secondary schools: relationships with attendance and exclusion. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Education Section Annual Conference , Trade Union Congress Education Centre, London.
35.
Hayward, A. (2002). Good practice guidelines for learning support units. London: Department for Education and Skills.
36.
Henry, J. (2002, March 8). Safe and ready to work. Times Educational Supplement, p. 27.
37.
Lewis, A. (2001). Reflections on interviewing children and young people as a method of inquiry in exploring their perspectives on integration/inclusion . Journal for Research in Special Educational Needs, 1, 110—116.
38.
Lewis, A. (2002). Accessing, through research interviews, the views of children with difficulties in learning. Support for Learning , 17, 110—116.
39.
Lewis, A., & Lindsay, G. (Eds.). (2000). Researching children's perspectives. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
40.
Marcus, J. (2001, May 4). School pays blind boy to stay away. Times Educational Supplement, p. 20.
41.
Margrave, R. (2002, June 14). Focus on exclusion is critical. Times Educational Supplement, p. 2.
42.
Martin, N. (2001, July 27). The £70,000 price of disorder. Times Educational Supplement, p.79.
43.
McKeon, M. (2001) Promoting the inclusion of students at risk of exclusion: An evaluative case study. Emotional and BehaviouralDifficulties,6, 236—250.
44.
Mittler, P.M. (2000). Working towards inclusive education: Social contexts . London: Fulton.
45.
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stott, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, B. (1988). School matters. London: Open Books.
46.
National Educational Research Forum. (2001 ). Research and development strategy for education: Developing quality and diversity. Nottingham. England: NERF Publications.
47.
Nowicki, S., & Strickland, B.R. (1991). The Nowicki & Strickland internal-external control scale for children. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 442—446). New York: Academic Press.
48.
O'Kane, K. (2002). Evaluating policy and practice in respect of transition from pre-school to primary school. Unpublished honors dissertation, University College, Worcester, England.
49.
Ostler, A.,Watling, R., Busher, H., Cole, T., & White, T. (2001) Reasons for exclusion from school (Research Brief No. 244). London: Department for Education and Employment.
50.
Parsons, C., Hayden, C., Godfrey, R., Howlett, K., & Martin, T. (2001). Outcomes in secondary education for children excluded from primary school (Research Brief No. 271). London: Department of Education and Employment.
51.
Passmore, B. (2002a, March 8). Canadian “total inclusion” zone. Times Educational Supplement, p.12.
52.
Passmore, B. (2002b, March 8). Slough aims for zero intolerance. Times Educational Supplement, p.12.
53.
Robinson, J. P., Shavers, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.). (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. New York: Academic Press .
54.
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalised expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1, Whole No. 609).
55.
Rotter, J.B., Chance, J.E., & Phares, E.J. (1972). Applications of social learning theory of personality . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
56.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J., with Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours. London : Open Books.
57.
Schools Council. (1968). Enquiry 1: Young school leavers. (Report of an inquiry carried out for the Schools Council by the Government Social Survey). London: Her Majesty's Office.
58.
Sebba, J., & Sachdev, D. (2002). What works in inclusive education? In N. Frederickson & T. Cline (Eds.), Special educational needs, inclusion and diversity: A textbook. Buckingham, England: Open University Press .
59.
Slater, J. (2002, February 15). Parliamentary questions. Times Educational Supplement, p. 69.
60.
Thomas, K. (2002, January 30). Exclusion is not the only way. The Daily Telegraph, p. 16.
61.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: Author.
62.
Vulliamy, G., & Webb, R. (2001). The social construction of school exclusion rates: Implications for evaluation methodology. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001496.htm
63.
Walford, G. (2002). Refining school effectiveness. Westminster Studies in Education, 25(1), 47—58.
64.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement, motivation and emotion. Psychological Review,92, 548—573.
65.
Wolfendale, S. (2000). Special needs in the early years: Prospects for policy and practice. Support for Learning, 15(4), 147—151.
