Literature on access to assistive technology (AT), AT services, and AT funding, as well as literature on access to loans (i.e., mortgages and car loans) has indicated that people from minority populations tend to experience less access to and benefit from these programs. Given these trends, the question arises: To what extent does race affect access to AT through alternative financing programs? Using a national database of 10 participating states, the authors of this article explored the impact of race upon which persons apply for—and succeed in obtaining—alternative financing. The authors then provide an in-depth discussion of Pennsylvania's model outreach program designed to increase access to and use of alternative financing by members of the African American, Latino, and Southeast Asian communities in the commonwealth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alston, R.J., & Bell, T.J. (1996). Cultural mistrust and the rehabilitation enigma for African Americans. Journal of Rehabilitation, 62(2), 16—20.
2.
Augusto, C.R., & Schroeder, P.W. (1995). Ensuring equal access to information for people who are blind or visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 89(4), 9—11, 13.
3.
Assistive Technology Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.
4.
Avery, R.B., & Buynak, T.M. (1981, Summer). Mortgage redlining: Some new evidence . Economic Review, pp. 18—32.
5.
Behrmann, M.M. (1995). Assistive technology training. In K. F. Flippo, K. J. Inge, & J. M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource forschool, work, and community (pp. 211—222). Baltimore: Brookes .
6.
Benston, G.J., & Horsky, D. (1991). The relationship between the demand and supply of home financing and neighborhood characteristics: An empirical study of mortgage redlining. Journal of Financial Services Research , 5, 235—260.
7.
Bryant, D.P., Erin, J., Lock, R., Allan, J.M., & Resta, P.E. (1998). Infusing a teacher preparation program in learning disabilities with assistive technology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 55—70.
8.
Carey, A., & Robichaw, B. (2002). Evaluating Pennsylvania's Assistive Technology Financing Program. Philadelphia: Institute on Disabilities.
9.
Danek, M.M., & Lawrence, R.E. (1982). Client-counselor racial similarity and rehabilitation outcomes. Journal of Rehabilitation , 48(3), 54—58.
10.
Dunst, C., Trivette, C., & Deal, A. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
11.
Espe, J.O. (1998, March). Creating school based assistive technology teams in rural states: An inservice training model. Paper presented at the 1998 Technology and Persons with Disabilities conference , Los Angeles.
12.
Finlayson, M., & Hammel, J. (2003). Providing alternative financing for assistive technology: Outcomes over twenty months. Journal of DisabilityPolicy Studies, 14, 109—118, 125.
13.
Flowers, C.R., Edwards, D., & Pusch, B. (1996). Rehabilitation cultural diversity initiative: A regional survey of cultural diversity within CILs. Journal of Rehabilitation, 62(2), 22—28.
14.
Kalyanpur, M., & Rao, S.S. (1991). Empowering low-income black families of handicapped children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 523— 532.
15.
Kemp, C.E., & Parette, H.P. (2000). Barriers to minority family involvement in assistive technology decision-making processes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 384—392.
16.
LePlante, M.P., & Carlson, D. (1996). Disability in the United States: Prevalence and causes, 1992 (Disability Statistics Report 7). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
17.
Lesar, S. (1998). Use of assistive technology with young children with disabilities: Current status and training needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(2), 146—159.
18.
Martin, R.E., & Hill, C. (2000). Loan performance and race. Economic Inquiry, 38, 136—150.
19.
McFarlane, F.R., Farley, T.H., Guerrero, J.L., & Galeái, K.E. (1996). Embracing diversity in rehabilitation in Pacific cultures. American Rehabilitation, 22(2), 20—28.
20.
McGregor, G., & Pachuski, P. (1996). Assistive technology in schools: Are teachers ready, able, and supported?Journal of Special Education Technology , 13(1), 4—15.
21.
McInerney, M., Osher, D., & Kane, M. (1997). Improving the availability and use of technology for children with disabilities. Washington, DC: Chesapeake Institute of the American Institutes for Research.
22.
Munnell, A., Browne, L.E., McEaneaney, J., & Tootell, G.M. (1996). Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. American Economic Review, 86(1), 25—53.
23.
National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research. (1999). A review of the literature on topics related to increasing the utilization of rehabilitation research outcomes among diverse consumer groups. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
24.
National Council on Disability. (1993). Meeting the unique needs of minorities with disabilities: A report to the President and Congress. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
National Council on Disability. (1997). Outreach to minorities with disabilities and people with disabilities in rural communities: Roundtable report of findings. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
NorthCarolina StateDepartment of Human Resources. (1995). North Carolina infant, toddler, and preschool assistive technology needs assessment: A report on the provision of assistive technology devices and services to children with disabilities from birth to age 5 in North Carolina. Raleigh : Author.
27.
O'Brien, A.M., & Rhoades, G.W. (1996). Providing outreach and rehabilitation counseling services to non-English speaking persons. American Rehabilitation , 29(1), 7—9.
28.
Parette, H.P., Brotherson, M.J., Hourcade, J.J., & Bradley, R.H. (1996). Family-centered assistive technology assessment . Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 102—113.
29.
Parette, H.P., & Petch-Hogan, B. (2000). Approaching families: Facilitating culturally/linguistically diverse family involvement. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(2), 4—10.
30.
Parette, H.P., & Vanbiervliet, A. ( 1990). School-age children with disabilities and technology needs. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 198—206.
31.
Santiago, A.M., Villarruel, F.A., & Leahy, M.J. (1996). Latino access to rehabilitation services: Evidence from Michigan. American Rehabilitation, 22(1), 10—17.
32.
Scherer, M. (1991). Assistive technology use, avoidance and abandonment: What we know so far. In H. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth annual conference, technology and persons with disabilities (pp. 815—826). Los Angeles : California State University—Northridge, Office of Disabled Student Services.
33.
Smart, J.F., & Smart, D.W. (1997). The racial/ethnic demography of disability. Journal of Rehabilitation, 63(4), 9—15.
34.
Smith, M.J., & Ryan, A.S. (1987). Chinese-American families of children with developmental disabilities: An exploratory study of reactions to service providers. Mental Retardation, 23, 345—350.
35.
Stengel, M., & Glennon, D. (1999). Evaluating statistical models of mortgage lending discrimination: A bank-specific analysis. Real Estate Economics , 27, 299—334.
36.
Suazo, A. (1986). The emerging role of disabled Hispanics. In S. Walker, F. Z. Belgrave, A. M. Banner, & S. Nicholls (Eds.), Equal to the challenge: Perspectives, problems, and strategies in the rehabilitation of the nonwhite disabled (pp. 97—108). Washington, DC: Howard University, School of Education , Bureau of Educational Research.
