Aby, J.S., Pheley, A.M., & Steinberg, P. (1996). Motivation for participation in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of asthma, seasonal allergic rhinitis, and perennial nonallergic rhinitis. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology , 76, 348-354.
2.
Alzheimer's Association. (1997). Ethical issues in dementia research. Retrieved February 6, 2002, from http://www.alz.org/aboutus/overview/statements.htm
3.
Alzheimer's Association. (2001). General statistics/demographics. Retrieved June 7, 2002, from http://www.alz.org
4.
American Bar Association, Commission on Legal Problems of the Elderly. (2001). State health decisions legislative update-2001. Retrieved May 28, 2002, from http://www.abanet.org/elderly/update.html
5.
American College of Physicians. (1989). Cognitively impaired subjects. Annals of Internal Medicine , 111, 843-848.
6.
Annas, G.J. (1992). The Nuremberg code in U.S. courts: Ethics versus expedience. In G. J. Annas & M. A. Grodin (Eds.), The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code (pp. 201-222). New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Annas, G.J., & Grodin, M.A. (1999). Medical ethics and human rights: Legacies of Nuremberg . Hofstra Law & Policy Symposium, 3, 111.
8.
Appelbaum, P.S. (2002). Involving decisionally impaired subjects in research. AmericanJournal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10, 120-124.
9.
Bayer, R. (1991). Public health policy and the AIDS epidemic: An end to HIV exceptionalism?New England Journal of Medicine , 324, 1500-1504.
10.
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. (2002 ). Psychiatric advance directive. Retrieved August 6, 2002, from http://www.bazelon.org/advdir.html
11.
Beauchamp, T.L., & Childress, J.F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Berg. J.W. (1996). Legal and ethical complexities of consent with cognitively impaired research subjects: Proposed guidelines. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 24, 18-35.
13.
Broome, M.E., Richards, D.J., & Hall, J.M. (2001). Children in research: The experience of ill children and adolescents. Journal of FamilyNursing, 7(1), 32-49.
14.
Coleman, C. (1999). Drug research for mental illness. Retrieved February 19, 2002, from http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/may99/psych.htm
15.
Cunny, K.A., & Miller, H.W. (1994). Participation in clinical drug studies: Motivations and barriers. Clinical Therapeutics, 16, 272-282.
16.
DeRenzo, E.G. (1997). Decisionally impaired persons in research: Refining the proposed refinements. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , 25, 139-149.
17.
Dickersin, K. (1990). The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association , 263, 1385-1389.
18.
Duff, J.J. (1997). Reflections on human cloning. Testimony before the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Retrieved February 2, 2001, from http://www.religion-online.org/cgi-bin/relsearchd.dll?action+showitem&id=435
19.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life's dominion. New York: Random House.
20.
Emanuel, E.J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 283, 2701-2711.
21.
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Fazel, S., Hope, T., & Jacoby, R. (1999). Dementia, intelligence, and the competence to complete advance directives. Lancet, 354(9172), 4-53.
23.
Fins, J.J., & Miller, F.G. (2000). Enrolling decisionally incapacitated subjects in neuropsychiatric research. CNS Sprectrums, 5(10), 32-42. Retrieved February 19, 2002, from http://www.cme-reviews.com/CMEReviews/neuropsych_illness/CNS1000_Fins.html
24.
Glantz, L.H. (1998). Research with children. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 24(2 & 3), 213-44.
25.
Glass, K., & Speyer-Ofenberg, M. (1996). Incompetent persons as research subjects and the ethics of minimal risk. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5, 362-372.
26.
Haimowitz, S., Delano, S., & Oldham, J.M. (1997). Uninformed decisionmaking: The case of surrogate research consent. Hastings Center Report, 27(6), 9-16.
27.
Hart v. Brown. (1972).289 A.2d 386 (Conn. Super. Ct.).
28.
Jacobsen v. Massachusetts. (1905).197 U.S. 11.
29.
Jonas, H. (1970). Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. In P. A. Freund (Ed.), Experimentation with human subjects (pp. 1-31). New York: G. Braziller.
30.
Katz, J. (1992). The consent principle of the Nuremberg Code: Its significance then and now. In G. J. Annas & M. A. Grodin (Eds.), The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human rights in human experimentation (pp. 227-239). New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Katz, J. (1995). ACHRE report. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Final Report. Retrieved February 7, 2001, from http://tis.eh.doe.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/index.html
32.
Kim, S.Y.H., Cox, C., & Caine, E.D. (2002). Impaired decision-making ability in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and willingness to participate in research. American Journal of Psychiatry,159, 797-802.
33.
Kolata, G. (2002). Science needs a healthy negative outlook. New York Times. Retrieved July 7, 2002, from http://www.nytimes.com
34.
Lenzer, J. (2002). Alteplase for stroke: Money and optimistic claims buttress the "brain attack" campaign. BMJ, 324, 723-729.
35.
Malinowski, M.J., & O'Rourke, M.A. (1996). A false start? The impact of federal policy on the genotechnology industry. Yale Journal on Regulation, 13, 163-250.
36.
McCormick, R.A. (1974). Proxy consent in the experimentation situation . Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 18, 2-20.
37.
Murphy. L. (2001). Beneficence, law, and liberty: The case of required rescue. Georgetown Law Journal, 89(3), 605-665.
38.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1998 ). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity: Vol. 1. Report and recommendations. Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission .
39.
National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). Research involving individuals with questionable capacity to consent: Points to consider . Retrieved February 6, 2002, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/questionablecapacity.htm
40.
Noble, J., Jr. (1987). Ethical considerations facing society in rehabilitating severely disabled persons. In F. Ferrari & M. Sussman (Eds.), Childhood disability and family systems. Marriage and Family Review , 11(1/2),65-82.
41.
Pincus, H. (1998). Testimony of the American Psychiatric Association on research involving subjects with disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity before the national bioethics advisory commission. October 20, 1998. Retrieved September 1, 2000, from http://www.psych.org/pub_pol_adv/pincus.html
42.
Post, S.G. (in press). Full spectrum proxy consent for research participation when persons with Alzheimer disease lose decisional capacities: Research ethics and the common good. Alzheimer Disease & Associate Disorders.
43.
Povenmire, R. (1998-1999). Do parents have the legal authority to consent to the surgical amputation of normal, healthy tissue from their infant children? The practice of circumcision in the United States. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 7, 87-123.
44.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Richards, T. (1994). The World Medical Association: Can hope triumph over experience?BMJ, 308, 262-266.
46.
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital. (1914). 105 N.E.2d 92.
47.
Some demented patients are still able to execute advance directives. (1996). Geriatrics, 51(7), 5-13.
48.
Strunk v. Strunk. (1969). 445 S.W.2d 145.
49.
Sundrum, C.J. (1998). In harm's way: Research subjects who are decisionally impaired. Journal of Health CareLaw & Policy, 1, 36-65.
50.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998). Alzheimer's disease: Estimates of prevalence in the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
51.
Washington v. Harper. (1990). 494 U.S. 210.
52.
Weindling, P. (2001). The origins of informed consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremberg Code. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 75, 37-71.
53.
Weiss, R. (2002, March 2). Alzheimer's vaccine permanently shelved . Washington Post, p. A03.
54.
Wendler, D. (2000). Informed consent, exploitation and whether it is possible to conduct human subjects research without either one. Bioethics, 14, 310-339.
55.
Wendler, D., Martinez, R.A., Fairclough, D., Sunderland, T., & Emanuel, E. (2002). Views of potential subjects toward proposed regulations for clinical research with adults unable to consent. American Journal of Psychiatry,159, 585-591.
