Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Traditionally, our long-term care system has had a strong institutional bias, with care directed by health care professionals and few options for consumers. There is now a growing trend toward consumer direction and consumer choice in long-term care. Some degree of consumer direction can be achieved under different models of long-term care, but many consumers prefer the independent living model in which they hire, train, and manage their own personal assistants. The Supreme Court's Olmstead decision supported the consumer-direction trend, finding that unjustified institutionalization is discriminatory and that Medicaid recipients with disabilities must receive their care in the most integrated setting appropriate. Initiatives by disability rights advocates, states, and the federal government to ensure the option of consumer-directed home- and community-based care, as well as innovative home-based programs in other countries, have further fueled the trend. The policy challenge will be to offer consumer-directed care on an equal basis with other long-term care options in a manner that meets the needs of people with different disabilities, and thereby to implement consumer choice in a manner that allows people with different disabilities to decide for themselves which option best meets their needs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.

Batavia, A.I. (1998). The prospects for a national personal assistance services program for people with disabilities. American Rehabilitation , 24(3).

Batavia, A.I. (2001). A right to personal assistance services: “Most integrated setting appropriate” requirements and the independent living model of long-term care. American Journal of Law and Medicine , 27(1), 17—43.

Batavia, A.I. (in press). Independent living: A viable option for long-term care . Clearwater, FL: ABI Professional Publications.

Batavia, A.I. , DeJong, G. , & McKnew, L.B. (1991). Toward a national personal assistance program: The independent living model of long-term care for persons with disabilities. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 16, 523—545.

Beatty, P.W. , Richmond, G.W. , Tepper, S. , & DeJong, G. (1998). Personal assistance for people with physical disabilities: Consumer-direction and satisfaction with services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 79, 674—677.

Benjamin, A.E. , Matthias, R. , & Franke, T.M. (2000). Comparing consumer-directed and agency models for providing supportive services at home. Health Services Research, 35, 351—366.

Dautel, P.J. , & Frieden, L. (1999). Consumer choice and control: Personal attendant services and supports in America (Report of the National Blue Ribbon Panel on Personal Assistance Services). Houston, TX: Independent Living and Research Utilization Program.

DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 60(10), 435— 446.

10.

DeJong, G. , Batavia, A.I. , & McKnew, L. (1992, Winter). The independent living model of personal assistance in national long-term care policy. Generations, 16, 89—95.

11.

DeJong G. , & Wenker, T. (1979). Attendant care as a prototype independent living service. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 60(10), 477—482.

12.

DeJong, G. , & Wenker, T. (1983). Attendant care as a prototype independent living service. Caring, 2(2), 26—30.

13.

Doty, P. (2000). The federal role in the move toward consumer direction . Generations, 24(3), 922—927.

14.

Doty, P. , Kasper, J. , & Litvak, S. (1996). Consumer-directed models of personal care: Lessons from Medicaid. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 74, 377— 409.

15.

European Social Network ( John Halloran , editor). (1998). Towards a people's Europe: A report on the development of direct payments in 10 member states of the European union. East Sussex, United Kingdom: Author .

16.

Kane, R.A. , Kane, R.L. , & Ladd, R.C. (1998). The heart of long-term care. New York: Oxford University Press.

17.

Kapp, M.B. (1999). From medical patients to health care care consumers: Decisional capacity and choices to purchase coverage and services. Aging and Mental Health, 3, 294—300.

18.

Kapp, M.B. (1996). Enhancing autonomy and choice in selecting and directing long-term care services. The Elder Law Journal, 4(1), 55—97.

19.

Karger, J. (1999). Don't tread on the ADA: Olmstead v L.C. ex rel. Zimmring and the future of community integration for individuals with mental disabilities. Boston College Law Review, 40, 1221.

20.

Litvak, S. , Zukas, H. , & Heumann, J.E. (1987). Attending to America: Personal assistance for independent living. Berkeley, CA: World Institute on Disability.

21.

Medicaid Community Attendant Services Act of 1999, S. 1935, 106th Congress (1999).

22.

Mahoney, K.J. , Simone, K. , & Simon-Rusinowitz, L. (2000). Early lessons from the cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation. Generations , 24(3), 41—46.

23.

Miller, N. (1992). Medicaid home and community-based care waivers: The first ten years. Health Affairs, 11(4), 162—172.

24.

National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems. (2000). Olmstead progress report: Disability advocates assess state implementation after one year. Retrieved July 25, 2000, from www.protectionandadvocacy.com/progressreportfinal.htm

25.

National Conference of State Legislatures. ( 2001). The states' response to the Olmstead decision: A status report. Retrieved March 2001, from www.ncsl.org/programs/health/forum/olmsreport.htm

26.

National Institute on Consumer-Directed Long-Term Services. (1996). Principles of consumer-directed home and community-based services. Washington, DC: The National Council on the Aging.

27.

Nosek, M.A. (1993). Personal assistance: Its effect on the long-term health of a rehabilitation hospital population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(2), 127—132.

28.

Richmond, G.W. , Beatty, P.W. , Tepper, S. , & DeJong, G. (1997). The effect of consumer-directed personal assistance services on the productivity outcomes of people with disabilities . Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, 1(4), 48—51.

29.

Simon-Rusinowitz, L. , Mahoney, K. , Desmond, S.M. , et al. (1997). Determining consumer preferences for a cash option (AQ1): Arkansas survey results. Health Care Financing Review, 19(2), 73—96.

30.

Stone, R.I. (2000). Introduction—Consumer direction in long-term care: Opportunities, challenges, and limitations of this increasingly popular approach. Generations, 24(3), 5—8.

31.

Tilly, J. , Weiner, J.M. , & Cuellar, A.E. (2000). Consumer-directed home- and community-based services programs in five countries: Policy issues for older people and government . Generations, 24(3), 74—84.

Consumer Direction,Consumer Choice,and the Future of Long-Term Care

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References