Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This qualitative study explores individuals' perspectives regarding what they believe sustained the use of facilitated communication (FC), a controversial augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) method, in their place of work during the past 8 years. It was found that personal experiences with the method challenged mental models (Senge, 1994) of disability constructs, allowing for further exploration of the method in collaborative work groups. Administrative support and individual and organizational histories were also elements that supported use of FC. The author contends that a complex and individualized method such as FC thrives in an environment that supports and encourages professional inquiry.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan, J. (1999). Actively seeking inclusion: Pupils with special needs in mainstream schools. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Beer, M. , Eisenstatt, R.A. , & Spector, B. (1990). The critical path to corporate renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Biklen, D. , & Cardinal, D. (Eds.). (1997). Contested words, contested science. New York: Teachers College Press.

Bogdan, R. , & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Crossley, R. (1997). Speechless. New York: Penguin Books.

Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.

Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.

Fullan, M. , & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What's worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.

10.

Fullan, M. (with Stiegelbauer, S. ). (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

11.

Kliewer, C. , & Landis, D. (1999). Individualizing literacy instruction for young children with moderate to severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66(1), 85-100.

12.

Lewis, A. (1989). Restructuring America's schools. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrator s.

13.

Salisbury, C.L. , Wilson, L.L. , & Palombaro, M.M. (1998). Promoting inclusive schooling practices through practitioner directed inquiry. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(3), 223-237.

14.

Sarason, S.B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

15.

Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

16.

Senge, P.M. (1994). The fifth discipline. New York : Currency Doubleday.

17.

Thousand, J.S. , & Villa, R.A. (1992). Collaborative teams: A powerful tool in school restructuring. In R. A. Villa , J. S. Thousand , W. Stainback , & S. Stainback (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education (pp. 73-108). Baltimore : Brookes.

18.

Ware, L. (1994). Innovative instructional practices: A naturalistic study of the structural and cultural conditions of change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Special Education, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

Encouraging Inquiry

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References