A Review of the Evolution of the NCS-NCVS Police Reporting and Response Questions and Their Application to Older Women Experiencing Violent Victimization
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2025
A Review of the Evolution of the NCS-NCVS Police Reporting and Response Questions and Their Application to Older Women Experiencing Violent Victimization
Little attention is given to the history of the data that underlie research on crime trends and patterns. This article considers the evolution of the National Crime Victimization Survey’s (NCVS) police reporting and response questions. These questions are particularly important as the NCVS is the only nationally representative source of information on whether crime is reported to the police and citizen views of police actions. In addition, the current NCVS redesign is set to substantially add to these items. To provide a context for this discussion, this article applies the police reporting and response questions to an understudied victim group, specifically older women who experience violent victimization. This application illustrates the research opportunities and challenges for working with these data.
AbbottJ.McGrathS. A.MayD. C. (2020). The effects of police effort on victims’ fear of crime. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 880–898.
2.
AddingtonL. A. (2011a). Did the police respond to your call? Victim reports of police response and follow up activities. American Society of Criminology Presentation Paper.
3.
AddingtonL. A. (2011b, December14). Redesigning the NCVS crime incident form: Background and project scope [Paper presentation]. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
4.
AddingtonL. A. (2013). Who are you calling old? Measuring “elderly” and what it means for homicide research. Homicide Studies, 17, 134–153.
5.
AddingtonL. A. (2023, November1). Intimate partner homicide against older women: The role of firearms across age and relationship status [Paper presentation]. 2023 National Research Conference for the Prevention of Firearm-Related Harms. Chicago, IL.
6.
AugustynM. B.WillyardK. C. (2022). The contextual influences of police and social service providers on formal help-seeking after incidents of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37, NP1077–NP1104.
7.
AvakameE. F.FyfeJ. J.McCoyC. (1999). “Did you call the police? What did they do?” An empirical assessment of Black’s theory of mobilization of law. Justice Quarterly, 16, 765–792.
8.
BachmanR. (1996). Victim’s perceptions of initial police responses to robbery and aggravated assault: Does race matter?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 363–390.
9.
BidermanA. D. (1967). An overview of victim survey research: A paper for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. Bureau of Social Science Research.
10.
BidermanA. D. (1981). Notes on the methodological development of the National Crime Victimization Survey. In LehnenR. G.SkoganW. G. (Eds.), The National Crime Survey: Working papers, volume 1: Current and historical perspectives (pp. 30–33). U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
BidermanA. D.CantorD.LynchJ.MartinE. (1986). Final repot of research and development for the redesign of the National Crime Survey. Bureau of Social Science Research.
12.
BidermanA. D.JohnsonL. A.McIntyreJ.WeirA. W. (1967). Report on a pilot study in the district of Columbia on victimization and attitudes toward law enforcement [President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice: Field Surveys I]. U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
BidermanA. D.LynchJ. P. (1982). Final technical report National Crime Survey redesign program. Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
14.
BidermanA. D.ReissA. J.Jr. (1967). On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 374, 1–15.
15.
BidermanA. D. (n.d.). Outline of attributes of victimizing events (Item 613). Bureau of Social Science Research.
BrossoieN.RobertoK. A. (2015). Community professionals’ response to intimate partner violence against rural older women. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 27, 470–488.
CaltonJ.CattaneoL. B. (2014). The effects of procedural and distributive justice on intimate partner violence victims’ mental health and likelihood of future help-seeking. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 329–340.
21.
CantorD.LynchJ. P. (2000). Self-report surveys as measures of crime and criminal victimization. In DuffeeD.McDowallD.OstromB.CrutchfieldR. D.MastrofskiS. D.MazerolleL. G. (Eds.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 85–138). U.S. Department of Justice.
22.
CookJ. M.DinnenS.O’DonnellC. (2011). Older women survivors of physical and sexual violence: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of Women’s Health, 20, 1075–1081.
23.
CrockettC.BrandlB.DabbyF. C. (2015). Survivors in the margins: The invisibility of violence against older women. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 27, 291–302.
24.
DodgeR. W.TurnerA. G. (1981). Methodological foundations for establishing a national survey of victimization. In LehnenR. G.SkoganW. G. (Eds.), The National Crime Survey: Working papers, volume 1: Current and historical perspectives (pp. 65–67). U.S. Department of Justice.
25.
EnnisP. H. (1967). Criminal victimization in the United States: A report of a national survey [President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice: Field Surveys II]. U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
GarofaloJ.HindelangM. J. (1977). An introduction to the National Crime Survey. U.S. Department of Justice.
27.
GasikR. E.PearlmanD. N.RosenthalS. R.DunsigerS. (2023). The impact of police response on intimate partner violence victims’ social, emotional, and physical well-being: Results from the National Victimization Survey. Violence and Victims, 38, 167–184.
28.
HowertonA. (2006). Police responses to crime: Differences in the application of law by race. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4, 51–66.
29.
KalishC. (1974). Crimes and victims: A report on the Dayton-San Jose pilot survey of victims. U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
KangJ. H.LynchJ. P. (2014). Calling the police in instances of family violence: Effects of victim–offender relationship and life stages. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 34–59.
KrienertJ. L.WalshJ. A. (2010). Eldercide: A gendered examination of elderly homicide in the United States, 2000-2005. Homicide Studies, 14, 52–71.
33.
LangtonL.PlantyM.LynchJ. P. (2017). Second major redesign of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 1049–1074.
34.
LynchJ. P. (1990). The current and future National Crime Survey (NCS). In MacKenzieD. L.BaunachP. J.RobergR. R. (Eds.), Measuring crime: Large-scale and long-range efforts (pp. 97–118). State University of New York Press.
35.
LynchJ. P. (2002). Using citizen surveys to produce information on the police: The Present and potential uses of the National Crime Victimization Survey. Justice Research and Policy, 4, 61–70.
36.
MeyerS. R.LasaterM. E.García-MorenoC. (2020). Violence against older women: A systematic review of qualitative literature. PLOS ONE, 15, Article e0239560.
37.
National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. (2023). National Crime Victimization Survey, concatenated file 1992-2022 (ICPSR 38604). National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/NACJD/studies/38604
38.
PenickB. K. E.OwensM. E. B. (1976). Surveying crime: Panel for the evaluation of crime surveys. National Academy of Sciences.
39.
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society. U.S. Government Printing Office.
ReissA. J.Jr. (1967). Studies in crime and law enforcement in major metropolitan areas [President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice: Field Surveys III]. U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
RobertoK. A.McPhersonM. C.BrossoieN. (2013). Intimate partner violence in late life: A review of the empirical literature. Violence Against Women, 19, 1538–1558.
SchreiberE.SalivarE. G. (2021). Using a vulnerability-stress-adaptation framework to model intimate partner violence risk factors in late life: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 57, 101493.
45.
SparksR. F. (1981). Surveys of victimization: An optimistic assessment. Crime and Justice, 3, 1–60.
46.
SunshineJ.TaylorT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37, 513–547.
47.
TettertonS.FarnsworthE. (2011). Older women and intimate partner violence: Effective interventions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2929–2942.
48.
TrumanJ. L.BrotsosH. (2023). Update on the NCVS instrument redesign: Operational pilot test and split sample. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/document/uncvsiroptss.pdf
49.
XieM.PogarskyG.LynchJ. P.McDowallD. (2006). Prior police contact and subsequent victim reporting: Results from the NCVS. Justice Quarterly, 23, 481–501.
