Using a sample of national stalking victims, this study draws from four general models applied in previous works on sexual harassment acknowledgment to propose a comprehensive model of stalking acknowledgment. The results indicate that the type of stalking behaviors, personal characteristics of victims, negative emotions experienced by victims, and changes in perceptions due to the intrusive behaviors are significant correlates of stalking acknowledgment. Implications of findings relating to the qualification of legal definitions of stalking and stalking reportage are also discussed.
BaumK.CatalanoS.RandM.RoseK. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
2.
BlockR. (1974). Why notify the police: The victim’s decision to notify the police of an assault. Criminology, 11, 555-569.
3.
DennisonS. M.ThomsonD. M. (2002). Identifying stalking: The relevance of intent in commonsense reasoning. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 543-561.
4.
DietzN. A.MartinP. Y. (2007). Women who are stalked: Questioning the fear standard. Violence Against Women, 13, 750-776.
5.
DuganL. (1999). The effect of criminal victimization on a household’s moving decision. Criminology, 37, 903-930.
6.
FisherBonnie S. (2001). Being pursued and pursuing during the college years: The extent, nature, and impact of stalking on college campuses. In DavisJoseph A. (Ed.), Stalking Crimes and Victim Protection: Prevention, Intervention, Threat Assessment, and Case Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
7.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2002). Being pursued: Stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 257-308.
8.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2003). Acknowledging sexual victimization as rage: Results from a national-level study. Justice Quarterly, 20, 535-574.
9.
GreenbergM. S.RubackR. B. (1992). After the crime: Victim decision-making. New York, NY: Plenum.
10.
JordanC. E.LoganT. K.WalkerR.NigoffA. (2003). Stalking: An examination of criminal justice response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 148-165.
11.
JordanC. E.WilcoxP.PritchardA. J. (2007). Stalking acknowledgement and reporting among college women experiencing intrusive behaviors: Implications for the emergence of a “classic stalking case.”Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 556-569.
12.
Lanrighrichsen-RohlingJ.PalareaR. E.CohenJ.RohlingM. L. (2000). Breaking up is hard to do: Unwanted pursuit behaviors following the dissolution of a romantic relationship. Violence and Victims, 15, 73-90.
13.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (1999). A routine activity theory explanation for women’s stalking victimizations. Violence Against Women, 5, 43-62.
14.
National Criminal Justice Association. (1993). Project to develop a model anti-stalking code for states. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
15.
National Institute of Justice. (1996). Domestic violence: Stalking, and antistalking legislation: An Annual Report to Congress under the Violence against Women Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
16.
NoblesM. R.FoxK. A.PiqueroN.PiqueroA. R. (2009). Career dimensions of stalking victimization and perpetration. Justice Quarterly, 26, 476-503.
17.
PhillipsL.QuirkR.RosenfeldB.O’ConnorM. (2004). Is it stalking? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 73-96.
18.
QuinneyR. (1970). The social reality of crime. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
19.
ReynsB. W.EnglebrechtC. M. (2010). The stalking victim’s decision to contact the police: A test of Gottfredson and Gottfredson’s theory of criminal justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 998-1005.
20.
StockdaleM. S.VauxA.CashinJ. (1995). Acknowledging sexual harassment: A test of alternative models. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 469-496.
21.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
22.
TjadenP.TheonnesN.AllisonC. J. (2000). Comparing stalking victimization from legal and victim perspectives. Violence and Victims, 15, 7-22.
