For the past 50 years, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has been committed to improving crime victimization estimates through three crime surveys: the National Crime Survey (1972–1991), National Crime Victimization Survey (1992–2023), and the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey (2024–present). This article explores the progression of how rape and sexual assault (RSA) have been measured across these surveys, highlighting key milestones, legislative impacts, and measurement changes. The key aspects include the transformation of sexual victimization definitions, the focus on behaviors and tactics in the type of crime classification, and the expansion from solely measuring rape to a broader spectrum of RSA. The dedication to refining RSA screening and classification methods through extensive testing and evaluation is evident. This evolution demonstrates BJS’s ongoing efforts to produce accurate RSA estimates and adapt to changing societal and legislative contexts.
BachmanR. (2000). A comparison of annual incidence rates and contextual characteristics of intimate-partner violence against women from the national crime victimization violence survey (NCVS). Violence Against Women, 6(8), 839–867.
3.
BachmanR.TaylorB. H. (1994). The measurement of family violence and rape by the redesigned national crime victimization survey. Justice Quarterly, 11(3), 499–512.
BelknapJ. (1987). Routine activity theory and the risk of rape: Analyzing ten years of national crime survey data. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/088740348700200403
6.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Simon and Schuster.
CantorD.EdwardsW. S.GiamboP.SteigerD. M.YanT.HicksW.SunH.DeMatteisJ.WestatInc. (2023). National crime victimization survey redesign field test Topline report: Comparing condition 1 and condition 2 by interleaving treatment (NCJ 303980). https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/bjs/grants/303980.pdf
10.
CantorD.LynchJ. P. (2005). Exploring the effects of changes in design on the analytical uses of the NCVS data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(3), 293–319.
11.
CantorD.SteigerD. M.TownsendR.HartgeJ. Y.FayR. E.WarrenA.HeatonL. L.KaasaS.MaitlandA.SunH.NormanG.JonesM.CatalanoS. M.BeckA. J.WestatInc. (2021). Methodological research to support the national crime victimization survey: Self—report data on rape and sexual assault—Pilot test (NCJ 256011). https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/256011.pdf
FisherB. S. (2009). The effects of survey question wording on rape estimates: Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Violence Against Women, 15(2), 133–147.
20.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T. (2000). Measuring the sexual victimization of women: Evolution, current controversies, and future research. In DuffeeD. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 4, pp. 317–390). U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
HubbleD. L. (1995). The national crime victimization survey redesign: New questionnaire and procedures development and phase-in methodology. JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. American Statistical Association. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y1995f.html
26.
KilpatrickD. G.EdmundsC. N.SeymourA. K. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. National Victim Center.
KossM. P. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8(2), 198–222.
29.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.UllmanS.WestC.WhiteJ. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370.
30.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170.
31.
KrebsC. P.LindquistC. H.WarnerT. D.FisherB. S.MartinS. L. (2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study: Final report. National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf
32.
LangtonL.PlantyM.LynchJ. P. (2017). Second major redesign of the national crime victimization survey. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(4), 1049–1074.
LehnenR. G.SkoganW. G. (1981). The national crime survey: Working papers. Volume 1: Current and historical perspectives (NCJ 75374). https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/75374.pdf
National Research Council. (1976). Surveying crime: Panel for the evaluation of crime surveys. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19945
40.
National Research Council. (1996). Understanding violence against women. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/5127
41.
National Research Council. (2003). Measurement issues in criminal justice research: Workshop summary. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10581
42.
National Research Council. (2004). Advancing the federal research agenda on violence against women. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10849
43.
National Research Council. (2008). Surveying victims: Options for conducting the national crime victimization survey. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12090
44.
National Research Council. (2014). Estimating the incidence of rape and sexual assault. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18605
RandM. R.RennisonC. M. (2005). Bigger is not necessarily better: An analysis of violence against women estimates from the national crime victimization survey and the national violence against women survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(3), 267–291.
RussellD. E. H. (1975). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. Stein and Day.
50.
RussellD. E. H. (1982a). Rape in marriage. Macmillan.
51.
RussellD. E. H. (1982b). The prevalence and incidence of forcible rape and attempted rape of females. Victimology: An International Journal, 4(1–4), pp81–93.
TaylorB. M.RandM. R. (1995). The national crime victimization survey redesign: New understanding of victimization dynamics and measurement. JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. American Statistical Association. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/papers/1995_011.pdf
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey. National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
United States. President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society: A report. U.S. Government Printing Office.
