Twice Punished: Perceived Procedural Fairness and Legitimacy of Monetary Sanctions

Abstract

Legal financial obligations (LFOs) are routinely assessed by the courts and corrections agencies. Yet, little is known about how individuals under correctional supervision experience and perceive legal debt. Understanding perceptions of LFOs is critical as research suggests that individuals who believe that criminal justice sanctions are fair and just are more likely to perceive the system as legitimate and comply. The current study examines in-depth interview data with individuals on probation or parole to understand perspectives of LFOs and what factors may condition these views. The results suggest that participants’ views are quite varied—expressing that they deserve some level of financial punishment, particularly in restitution cases, but they question additional costs that are not directly linked to the circumstances of the case, such as supervision fees, that exacerbate a perceived experience of double jeopardy or contradict the perceived purpose of the monetary assessment. Subgroup analyses suggest that individuals with a conviction for a sexual offense have secondary financial sanctions that deepen perceptions of inequities in the system.

Keywords

legal financial obligations community corrections procedural justice sex offenses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

Pelfrey

W. V.

Bedard

L. E.

Dhungana

Gertz

Golden

(2014). Female inmates’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813497479

Bannon

Nagrecha

Diller

(2010). Criminal justice debt: A barrier to re-entry. https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/Report_Criminal-Justice-Debt-%20A-Barrier-Reentry.pdf

Bierie

D. M.

(2013). Procedural justice and prison violence: Examining complaints among federal inmates (2000–2007). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028427

Blasko

B. L.

Taxman

F. S.

(2018). Are supervision practices procedurally fair? Development and predictive utility of a procedural justice measure for use in community corrections settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(3), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817749255

Bottoms

Tankebe

(2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.

Bowen

G. A.

(2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12–23.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brunson

R. K.

Wade

B. A.

(2019). Oh hell no, we don’t talk to police. Criminology and Public Policy, 18(3), 623–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12448

Brunson

R. K.

Weitzer

(2009). Police relations with black and white youths in different urban neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 44(6), 858–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408326973

10.

Button

D. M.

DeMichele

Payne

B. K.

(2009). Using electronic monitoring to supervise sex offenders: Legislative patterns and implications for community corrections officers. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(4), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403408329607

11.

Clear

(2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford University Press.

12.

Cochran

J. C.

Toman

E. L.

Shields

R. T.

Mears

D. P.

(2020). A uniquely punitive turn? Sex offenders and the persistence of punitive sanctioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820941172

13.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

14.

Desmond

Papachristos

A. V.

Kirk

D. S.

(2016). Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the black community. American Sociological Review, 81(5), 857–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416663494

15.

Diller

Greene

J. A.

Jacobs

M. S.

(2009). Maryland’s parole supervision fee: A barrier to reentry. Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law.

16.

Fernandes

A. D.

Cadigan

Edwards

Harris

(2019). Monetary sanctions: A review of revenue generation, legal challenges, and reform. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15(1), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042816

17.

Franke

Bierie

Mackenzie

D. L.

(2010). Legitimacy in corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x

18.

Friedman

Pattillo

(2019). Statutory inequality: The logics of monetary sanctions in state law. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(1), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2019.5.1.08

19.

Gau

J. M.

Brunson

R. K.

(2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902763889

20.

Harris

Evans

Beckett

(2010). Drawing blood from stones: Legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. American Journal of Sociology, 115(6), 1753–1799. https://doi.org/10.1086/651940

21.

Harris

Evans

Beckett

(2011). Courtesy stigma and monetary sanctions: Toward a socio-cultural theory of punishment. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 234–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411400054

22.

Heaton

Mayson

Stevenson

(2017). The downstream consequences of misdemeanor pretrial detention. Stanford Law Review, 69, Article 711.

23.

Huebner

B. M.

Kras

K. R.

Pleggenkuhle

(2019). Structural discrimination and social stigma among individuals incarcerated for sexual offenses: Reentry across the rural–urban continuum. Criminology, 57(4), 715–738.

24.

Huebner

B. M.

Kras

K. R.

Rydberg

Bynum

T. S.

Grommon

Pleggenkuhle

(2014). The effect and implications of sex offender residence restrictions: Evidence from a two-state evaluation. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(1), 139–168.

25.

Iratzoqui

Metcalfe

(2017). Set up for failure? Examining the influence of monetary sanctions on probation success. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(4), 370–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415586595

26.

Jackson

Tyler

T. R.

Bradford

Taylor

Shiner

(2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4–10.

27.

Jahncke

E. S.

(1991). United States v. Halper, punitive civil fines, and the double jeopardy and excessive fines clauses. NYUL Review, 66, Article 112.

28.

Johnson

Maguire

E. R.

Kuhns

J. B.

(2014). Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean. Law & Society Review, 48(4), 947–978.

29.

Kras

K. R.

(2013). Offender perceptions of mandated substance abuse treatment: An exploratory analysis of offender experiences in a community-based treatment program. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612462219

30.

Kras

K. R.

McGuirk

Pleggenkuhle

Huebner

B. M.

(2018). Compounded stigmatization: Collateral consequences of a sex offense conviction. In Huebner

B. M.

Frost

N. A.

(Eds.), Handbook on the consequences of sentencing and punishment decisions (pp. 188–203). Routledge.

31.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

32.

Link

N. W.

(2019). Criminal justice debt during the prisoner reintegration process: Who has it and how much? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(1), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818790291

33.

Makin

D. A.

Walker

A. M.

Campbell

C. M.

(2018). Paying to be punished: A statutory analysis of sex offender registration fees. Criminal Justice Ethics, 37(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2018.1551800

34.

Martin

K. D.

Sykes

B. L.

Shannon

Edwards

Harris

(2018). Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in us systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091915

35.

Miller

(2005). The status of qualitative research in criminology. In Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systemic Qualitative Research, Michele Lamont. Arlington, Virginia.

36.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2016). The connection of probation/parole officer actions to women offenders’ recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(4), 506–524.

37.

Omori

M. K.

Turner

S. F.

(2015). Assessing the cost of electronically monitoring high-risk sex offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 61(6), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712466373

38.

Page

Soss

(2017). Criminal justice predation and neoliberal governance. In Schram

S. F.

Pavlovskaya

(Eds.), Rethinking neoliberalism (pp. 141–161). Routledge.

39.

Pettit

(2012). Invisible men: Mass incarceration and the myth of black progress. Russel Sage Foundation.

40.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

(2017). Research note: Justice system–imposed financial penalties increase the likelihood of recidivism in a sample of adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016669213

41.

Pleggenkuhle

(2018). The financial cost of a criminal conviction: Context and consequences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(1), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817734278

42.

Rosenthal

Weissman

(2007). Sentencing for dollars: The financial consequences of a criminal conviction. https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/Report_Sentencing-for-Dollars.pdf

43.

Ruhland

(2019). It’s all about the money: An exploration of probation fees. Corrections. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1564635

44.

Ruhland

Rhine

E. E.

Robey

J. P.

Mitchell

K. L.

(2017). The continuing leverage of releasing authorities: Findings from a national survey. https://robinainstitute.umn.edu/sites/robinainstitute.umn.edu/files/final_national_parole_survey_2017.pdf

45.

Sampson

Bartusch

D. J.

(1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32(4), 777–804. https://doi.org/10.2307/827739

46.

Skeem

J. L.

Louden

J. E.

Polaschek

Camp

(2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397

47.

Skeem

J. L.

Manchak

(2008). Back to the future: From Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802134069

48.

Sparks

Bottoms

Hay

(1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Clarendon Press.

49.

Tankebe

(2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x

50.

Tatar Ii

J. R.

Kaasa

S. O.

Cauffman

. (2012). Perceptions of procedural justice among female offenders: Time does not heal all wounds. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(2), 268–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025118

51.

Turner

(2011). More than just early release. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(4), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00769.x

52.

Tyler

T. R.

(1990). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.

53.

Tyler

T. R.

(2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233

54.

Tyler

T. R.

(2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262627

55.

Tyler

T. R.

(2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.

56.

Tyler

T. R.

(2010). Legitimacy in corrections: Policy implications. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 127–134.

57.

Tyler

T. R.

Fagan

(2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State University Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.

58.

Tyler

Jackson

(2013). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper, (264).

59.

Wright

K. A.

Gifford

F. E.

(2017). Legal cynicism, antisocial attitudes, and recidivism: Implications for a procedurally just community corrections. Victims & Offenders, 12(4), 624–642.