Does Procedural Justice Matter in Probation? Investigating the Relationship Between Procedural Just Treatment and Law-Abiding Behavior Among a Sample of High-Risk Offenders

Abstract

Community supervision programs are instrumental for reducing the prison population and successfully reintegrating offenders back into society. Prior literature suggests that supportive relationships between legal authorities and their clients may foster law-abiding behavior. Using data from the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) program (N = 781), the current study investigates whether fair (procedurally just) treatment by community supervision officers is associated with compliance and receiving a formal violation. Findings from multivariate analyses suggest that individuals who perceive their supervising officer as treating them procedurally just are more likely to comply with directives and less likely to receive formal violations. Such findings underscore the importance of legal authorities treating probationers with dignity and respect. Policy implications and limitations are discussed.

Keywords

community corrections probation procedural justice recidivism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

L. H.

Wildeman

(2015). Measuring the effect of probation and parole officers on labor market outcomes and recidivism. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(4), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9243-4

Bahr

S. J.

Harris

Fisher

J. K.

Harker Armstrong

(2010). Successful reentry: What differentiates successful and unsuccessful parolees? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09342435

Bares

K. J.

Mowen

T. J.

(2020). Examining the parole officer as a mechanism of social support during reentry from prison. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6-7), 1023–1051. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719881599

Blasko

B. L.

Friedmann

P. D.

Rhodes

A. G.

Taxman

F. S.

(2015). The parolee–parole officer relationship as a mediator of criminal justice outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(7), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814562642

Blasko

B. L.

Taxman

F. S.

(2018). Are supervision practices procedurally fair? Development and predictive utility of a procedural justice measure for use in community corrections settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(3), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817749255

Bonta

Rugge

Scott

Bourgon

Yessine

A. K.

(2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802134085

Bosker

Witteman

Hermanns

(2013). Do intervention plans meet criteria for effective practice to reduce recidivism? How probation officers forget about social capital and basic needs. European Journal of Probation, 5(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031300500105

Bouffard

J. A.

Bergeron

L. E.

(2006). Reentry works: The implementation and effectiveness of a serious and violent offender reentry initiative. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 44(2-3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v44n02_01

Brown

K. L.

Reisig

M. D.

(2019). Procedural injustice, police legitimacy, and officer gender: A vignette-based test of the invariance thesis. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 37(6), 696–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2439

10.

Brown

K. L.

Walker

D. A.

Reisig

M. D.

(2022). The effects of procedural injustice and emotionality during citizen-initiated police encounters. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09526-w

11.

Bushway

S. D.

(2004). Labor market effects of permitting employer access to criminal history records. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986204266890

12.

Byrne

J. M.

Hummer

(2004). Examining the role of the police in reentry partnership initiatives. Federal Probation, 68(2), 62–69.

13.

Carson

E. A.

(2021). Prisoners in 2020-Stastistical tables. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/p20st.pdf.

14.

Casper

J. D.

Tyler

Fisher

(1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law & Society Review, 22(3), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053626

15.

Chamberlain

A. W.

Gricius

Wallace

D. M.

Borjas

Ware

V. M.

(2018). Parolee–parole officer rapport: Does it impact recidivism? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3581–3602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17741593

16.

Clear

T. R.

Rose

D. R.

Ryder

J. A.

(2001). Incarceration and the community: The problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128701047003003

17.

Dai

Frank

Sun

(2011). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.004

18.

Durose

M. R.

Cooper

A. D.

Snyder

H. N.

(2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010 (NCJ Publication No. 244205). Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

19.

Gladfelter

A. S.

Lantz

Ruback

R. B.

(2018). Beyond ability to pay: Procedural justice and offender compliance with restitution orders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(13), 4314–4331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18759195

20.

Gray

M. K.

Fields

Maxwell

S. R.

(2001). Examining probation violations: Who, what, and when. Crime & Delinquency, 47(4), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287010470040

21.

Hollander-Blumoff

Tyler

T. R.

(2008). Procedural justice in negotiation: Procedural fairness, outcome acceptance, and integrative potential. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(2), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00110.x

22.

Jannetta

Reginal

Lawrence

D. S.

Flood

LaGratta

E. G.

(2021). Applying procedural justice in community supervision: Assessment of pilot testing in the Georgia Department of Community Supervision. Urban Institute.

23.

Kaeble

(2021). Probation and parole in the United States, 2020. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

24.

Kaeble

Alper

(2020). Probation and parole in the United States, 2017–2018. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

25.

Kennealy

P. J.

Skeem

J. L.

Manchak

S. M.

Louden

J. E.

(2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093935

26.

Kluckow

Zeng

(2022). Correctional populations in the United States, 2020. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

27.

Liu

Miller

S. L.

Visher

C. A.

(2021). The strain of procedural injustice in parole among former prisoners: A test with a mixed-gender sample. Justice Quarterly, 38(4), 653–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1637011

28.

Liu

Visher

C. A.

O’Connell

D. J.

(2020). The strain from procedural injustice on parolees: Bridging procedural justice theory and general strain theory. Crime & Delinquency, 66(2), 250–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719839376

29.

Louden

J. E.

Skeem

J. L.

(2013). How do probation officers assess and manage recidivism and violence risk for probationers with mental disorder? An experimental investigation. Law and Human Behavior, 37(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093991

30.

Louden

J. E.

Skeem

J. L.

Camp

Vidal

Peterson

(2012). Supervision practices in specialty mental health probation: What happens in officer–probationer meetings? Law and Human Behavior, 36(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093961

31.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Holsinger

Robinson

C. R.

Alexander

(2014). Diminishing or durable treatment effects of STARR? A research note on 24 month re-arrest rates. Journal of Crime and Justice, 37(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.753849

32.

Mazerolle

Antrobus

Bennett

Tyler

T. R.

(2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x

33.

Miller

S. L.

Hefner

M. K.

(2015). Procedural justice for victims and offenders?: Exploring restorative justice processes in Australia and the US. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.760643

34.

Morash

Kashy

D. A.

Smith

S. W.

Cobbina

J. E.

(2015). The effects of probation or parole agent relationship style and women offenders’ criminogenic needs on offenders’ responses to supervision interactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(4), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814551602

35.

Paternoster

Bachman

Brame

Sherman

L. W.

(1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204.

36.

Petersilia

(2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.

37.

Reisig

M. D.

Mays

R. D.

Telep

C. W.

(2018). The effects of procedural injustice during police–citizen encounters: A factorial vignette study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9307-1

38.

Skeem

J. L.

Louden

J. E.

Polaschek

Camp

(2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397

39.

Skeem

Eno Louden

Manchak

Vidal

Haddad

(2009). Social networks and social control of probationers with co-occurring mental and substance abuse problems. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9140-1

40.

Sunshine

Tyler

T. R.

(2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002

41.

Trotter

(2013). Reducing recidivism through probation supervision: What we know and don’t know from four decades of research. Federal Probation, 77(2), 43–48.

42.

Tyler

T. R.

(2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1j66769.4

43.

Tyler

T. R.

Fagan

(2008). Why do people cooperate with the police? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6(1), 231–275.

44.

Tyler

T. R.

Goff

P. A.

MacCoun

R. J.

(2015). The impact of psychological science on policing in the United States: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and effective law enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791

45.

Visher

C. A.

Debus-Sherrill

S. A.

Yahner

(2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28(5), 698–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.535553

46.

Visher

C. A.

Travis

(2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931

47.

Wikoff

Linhorst

D. M.

Morani

(2012). Recidivism among participants of a reentry program for prisoners released without supervision. Social Work Research, 36(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svs021

48.

Williams

G. C.

Schaefer

(2022). Proposed principles for procedurally just probation and parole practices. Corrections Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2022.2048978

49.

Wodahl

E. J.

Mowen

T. J.

Garland

B. E.

(2021). The effect of individual characteristics and supervision experiences on the perceived quality of the supervision relationship. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(5), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420967070