This study examines the longitudinal relationship between procedural justice in encounters with parole or probation officers and non-compliance during community supervision. Based on two waves of data (3 and 9 months after release) from the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) project in the United States, a sample of 667 people on community supervision were examined. Cross-lagged structural equation models were employed to investigate associations. The results show an indirect negative effect from officer procedural justice at T1—via subsequent perceptions of procedural justice at T2—to recidivism at T2. How parole and probation officers interact with their clients may affect their clients’ likelihood of recidivism, violation of supervision conditions, and receiving a formal violation. Study findings are discussed in the context of the literature establishing the importance of quality relationships in community corrections.
AlwardL. M.CaudyM. S.ViglioneJ. (2020). Assessing the relative influence of individual attitudes, social supports, and neighborhood context on reentry outcomes: What changes matter most?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(11), 1487–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819901158
2.
AugustynM. B. (2015). The (ir)relevance of procedural justice in the pathways to crime. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000122
3.
AugustynM. B. (2016). Updating perceptions of (in)justice. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(2), 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815616991
4.
BakerT.AbderhaldenF. P.AlwardL. M.BedardL. E. (2021). Exploring the association between procedural justice in jails and incarcerated people’s commitment to institutional rules. Corrections, 6(3), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2019.1618224
5.
BakerT.PelfreyW. V.BedardL. E.DhunganaK.GertzM.GoldenK. (2014). Female inmates’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813497479
6.
BakerT.Van HallM.NieuwbeertaP.DirkzwagerA. J. E. (2024). Examining procedural justice spill-over effects on in-prison misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 93, Article 102228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102228
7.
BakerT.Van HallM.RayJ. V.NieuwbeertaP.DirkzwagerA. J. E. (2024). Perceptions of probation officer procedural justice, low self-control, and recidivism after release from prison. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 29(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12264
8.
BaresK. J.MowenT. J. (2020). Examining the parole officer as a mechanism of social support during reentry from prison. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6–7), 1023–1051. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719881599
9.
BarkworthJ. M.MurphyK. (2021). Procedural justice, posturing and defiant action: Exploring prisoner reactions to prison authority. Justice Quarterly, 38(3), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1666905
10.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J. E.EichelsheimV. I.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550710
11.
BeijersbergenK. A.DirkzwagerA. J. E.NieuwbeertaP. (2016). Reoffending after release: Does procedural justice during imprisonment matter?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609643
12.
BlaskoB. L.TaxmanF. S. (2018). Are supervision practices procedurally fair? Development and predictive utility of a procedural justice measure for use in community corrections settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(3), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817749255
13.
BourgonG.GuiterrezL. (2013). The importance of building good relationships in community corrections: Evidence, theory, and practice of the Therapeutic Alliance. In UgwudikeP.RaynorP. (Eds.), What works in offender compliance: International perspectives and evidence-based practices (pp. 256–275). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
14.
BucknerZ.MartinS.NorrisK.WalkerD. (2025). Does procedural justice matter in probation? Investigating the relationship between procedural just treatment and law-abiding behavior among a sample of high-risk offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 71(1), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287231211265
15.
BuehlerE. D.KluckowR. (2024). Correctional populations in the United States, 2022—Statistical tables. Bureau of Justice Statistic of the U.S. Department of Justice.
16.
ByrneB. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
17.
ChamberlainA. W.GriciusM.WallaceD. M.BorjasD.WareV. M. (2018). Parolee–parole officer rapport: Does it impact recidivism?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3581–3602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17741593
18.
ChamberlainA. W.WallaceD. (2016). Mass reentry, neighborhood context and recidivism: Examining how the distribution of parolees within and across neighborhoods impacts recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 33(5), 912–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1012095
19.
CullenF. T.JonsonC. L.MearsD. P. (2017). Reinventing community corrections. Crime and Justice, 46, 27–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/688457
20.
DollarC. B.RayB.HudsonM. K.HoodB. J. (2018). Examining changes in procedural justice and their influence on problem-solving court outcomes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2329
21.
DuroseM. R.AntenangeliL. (2021). Recidivism of prisoners released in 34 states in 2012: A 5-year follow-up period (2012-2017). Bureau of Justice Statistic of the U.S. Department of Justice.
22.
FaganJ.PiqueroA. R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 715–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00105.x
23.
FineA. D.BeardsleeJ.MaysR.FrickP. J.SteinbergL.CauffmanE. (2022). Measuring youths’ perceptions of police: Evidence from the crossroads study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000328
24.
GottfredsonD. S.KearleyB. W.NajakaS. S.RochaC. M. (2007). How drug treatment courts work: An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806291271
25.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
26.
JacksonJ.TylerT. R.BradfordB.TaylorD.ShinerM. (2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4–10. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/29676
27.
JannettaJ.ReginalT.LawrenceD. S.FloodC.LaGrattaE. G. (2021). Applying procedural justice in community supervision: Assessment of pilot testing in the Georgia Department of Community Supervision. Urban Institute.
28.
KaiserK.ReisigM. D. (2019). Legal socialization and self-reported criminal offending: The role of procedural justice and legal orientations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9375-4
29.
KennealyP. J.SkeemJ. L.ManchakS. M.Eno LoudenJ. (2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093935
30.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
31.
LabrecqueR. M.ViglioneJ.CaudyM. (2023). The impact of community supervision training programs on officer and client outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 40(4), 587–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2120062
32.
LattimoreP. K.VisherC. A. (2009). Multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Summary and synthesis. RTI International/Urban Institute.
33.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum.
34.
LowenkampC. T.HolsingerA. M.RobinsonC. R.CullenF. T. (2012). When a person isn’t a data point: Making evidence-based practice work. Federal Probation, 76(3), 11–21.
35.
MaguireE. R.Atkin-PlunkC. A.WellsW. (2021). The effects of procedural justice on cooperation and compliance among inmates in a work release program. Justice Quarterly, 38(6), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1634753
36.
McLeanK. (2017). Ethnic identity, procedural justice, and offending: Does procedural justice work the same for everyone?Crime & Delinquency, 63(10), 1314–1336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128715620429
37.
MorganK. A. (2018). Perceptions of justice: Views of jailed defendants on procedural and distributive justice. University at Albany, State University of New York.
38.
MuellerK. C.NohK.CareyM. T. (2022). The impact of fair relationships on rule compliance for women under community supervision. Women & Criminal Justice, 32(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1900992
PaternosterR.BrameR.BachmanR.ShermanL. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054098
42.
PennerE. K.ViljoenJ. L.DouglasK. S.RoeschR. (2014). Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: Predicting recidivism in youth. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000055
43.
RedlichA. D.HanW. (2014). Examining the links between therapeutic jurisprudence and mental health court completion. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000041
44.
RyanC.BerginM. (2022). Procedural justice and legitimacy in prisoners: A review of the extant empirical literature. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211053367
45.
SkeemJ. L.EncandelaJ.Eno LoudenJ. (2003). Perspectives on probation and mandated mental health treatment in specialized and traditional probation departments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 429–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.547
46.
SkeemJ. L.Eno LoudenJ.PolaschekD.CampJ. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
47.
SolomonA. L.KachnowskiV.BhatiA. (2005). Does parole work? Analyzing the impact of post prison supervision on rearrest outcomes. Urban Institute.
48.
SprottJ. B.GreeneC. (2010). Trust and confidence in the courts: Does the quality of treatment young offenders receive affect their views of the courts?Crime & Delinquency, 56(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707308176
49.
SteinerB.WooldredgeJ. (2018). Prison officer legitimacy, their exercise of power, and inmate rule breaking. Criminology, 56(4), 750–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12191
50.
SturmA.de VogelV.MengerA.HuibersM. J. H. (2021). Changes in offender-rated working alliance in probation supervision as predictors of recidivism. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1793986
51.
TaxmanF. S. (2012). Probation, intermediate sanctions, and community-based corrections. In PetersiliaJ.ReitzK. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections (pp. 363–386). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0015
52.
ThibautJ. W.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum.
53.
ThompsonA. J.PickettJ. T. (2021). Asymmetry in process-based model relationships: A longitudinal study of adjudicated adolescents. Criminology, 59(4), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12279
54.
TravisJ. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Urban Institute.
55.
TrotterC. (2006). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice. Sage.
56.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
57.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.
58.
TylerT. R.LindE. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X
59.
TylerT. R.ShermanL.StrangH.BarnesG. C.WoodsD. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law & Society Review, 41(3), 553–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00314.x
60.
Van HallM.BakerT.AlwardL.CaudyM. (2025). Procedural justice, legal cynicism and recidivism: A longitudinal test among people on community supervision. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 31(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70006
61.
Van HallM.BakerT.DirkzwagerA. J. E.NieuwbeertaP. (2024). Perceptions of probation officer procedural justice and recidivism: A longitudinal study in the Netherlands. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(8), 1139–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241244502
62.
Van HallM.BakerT.NieuwbeertaP.DirkzwagerA. J. E. (2024). Changes in probation officer procedural justice and self-reported recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X241282112
63.
Van HallM.DirkzwagerA. J. E.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2023). Procedural justice, perceived legitimacy, and reoffending behavior: In police and court setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(12), 1874–1892. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231206833
64.
Van HallM.DirkzwagerA. J. E.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2024). Detainees’ perceptions of procedural justice: An examination throughout the criminal justice system. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 68(13–14), 1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X221132229
65.
Van HallM.DirkzwagerA. J. E.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP. (2025). Differential effects of procedural justice? Examining heterogeneity in the perceptions and effects of procedural justice across first-time and recurrent detainees. Crime & Delinquency, 71(4), 1128–1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287231155924
66.
Van HallM.Van der LaanP. H.NieuwbeertaP.DirkzwagerA. J. E. (2024). Procedural justice in their eyes: A qualitative interview study among detainees. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X241234857
67.
VerweijS.TollenaarN.TeerlinkM.WeijtersG. (2021). Recidive onder justitiabelen in Nederland: Verslag over de periode 2008-2020. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC).
68.
VisherC. A.LattimoreP. K.BarrickK.TuellerS. (2017). Evaluating the long-term effects of prisoner reentry services on recidivism: What types of services matter?Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 136–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1115539
69.
WaltersG. D.BolgerP. C. (2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15, 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2
70.
YahnerJ.VisherC.SolomonA. (2008). Returning home on parole: Former prisoners’ experiences in Illinois, Ohio, and Texas. Urban Institute.
