Macro-level theories of punishment suggest that particular social conditions explain national imprisonment rates over place and time. Important causal factors underlying these theories include a country’s level of development, criminality, socioeconomic inequality, and political volatility. Based on a sample of 166 nations and set-theoretical methods, the present study uses the formal logic standards of necessity and sufficiency to evaluate the empirical merits of these widely assumed causal relations. After summarizing the confirmatory evidence and patterns of exceptional cases, results are discussed in terms of their implications for refining current macro-level theories of punishment and future testing of them through the conjunctive analysis of set-theoretic relations.
AlbrechtH.-J. (1987). Sanction policies and alternative measures to incarceration: European experiences with intermediate and alternative criminal penalties. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2, 21-52.
2.
AlesinaA.DevleeschauwerA.EasterlyW.KurlatS.WacziargR. (2002, December). Fractionalization (NBER Working Paper Series 9411). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
4.
ChamblissW. J. (1999). Power, politics, and crime. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
ChamblissW. J.SeidmanR. B. (1982). Law, order, and power. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
CohenS. (2002). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. London, England: Routledge.
7.
CrawfordC.ChiricosT.KleckG. (1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36, 481-512.
8.
DittonJ.FarrellS. (2000). Fear of crime. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
9.
DownesD.HansonK. (2006, November). Welfare and punishment: The relationship between welfare spending and imprisonment (Crime and Society Foundation Briefing Paper 2). London, England: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies at King’s College.
10.
DurkheimE. (1997). Division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
11.
EisnerM. (2001). Modernization, self-control and lethal violence: The long-term dynamics of European homicide rates in theoretical perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 618-638.
12.
EliasN. (1982). The civilizing process: State formation and civilization (Vol. II). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Original work published 1939)
13.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
GarlandD. (1992). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
GouldL. A.PateM. (2011). Penalty, power, and polity: Exploring the relationship between political repression and corporal punishment. International Criminal Justice Review, 21, 443-461.
17.
GreenbergD. F.WestV. (2001). State prison populations and their growth, 1971-1991. Criminology, 39, 615-654.
18.
HartT. C.RennisonC. M.MietheT. D. (2017). Identifying patterns of situational clustering and contextual variability in criminological data: An overview of conjunctive analysis of case configurations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 112-120.
International Centre for Prison Studies. (2004-2013). World prison population list (6th-10th editions). Available from http://www.prisonstudies.org
21.
JacobsD.HelmsR. E. (1996). Toward a political model of incarceration: A time-series examination of multiple explanations for prison admission rates. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 323-357.
22.
LaFreeG. (1998). Losing legitimacy: Street crime and the decline of social institutions in America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
LeeM. (2007). Inventing fear of crime: Criminology and the politics of anxiety. Collumption, UK: Willan.
24.
LiskaA. E. (1992). Social threat and social control. New York: State University of New York Press.
25.
MelossiD. (2008). Controlling crime, controlling society: Thinking about crime in Europe and America. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
26.
MietheT. D.LuH.DeibertG. (2005). Cross-national variability in capital punishment: Exploring the sociopolitical sources of its differential legal status. International Criminal Justice Review, 15, 115-130.
27.
MilovanovicD. (1997). Postmodern criminology. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
28.
NeapolitanJ. L. (2001). An examination of cross-national variation in punitiveness. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 691-710.
29.
QuinneyR. (1974). Critique of the legal order: Crime control in capitalistic society. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.
30.
RaginC. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Oakland: University of California Press.
31.
RaginC. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
32.
RaginC. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 4, 291-310.
33.
RaginC. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
RotbergR. I. (2004). When states fail: Causes and consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
RotheD. L. (2009). State criminality: The crime of all crimes. Lanham, MD: Lexington/Rowman & Littlefield.
36.
RuddellR. (2005). Social disruption, state formation and minority threat: A cross-national study of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 7, 7-28.
37.
RuddellR.UrbinaM. G. (2004). Minority threat and punishment: A cross-national analysis. Justice Quarterly, 21, 101-121.
38.
RuddellR.UrbinaM. G. (2007). Weak nations, political repression and punishment. International Criminal Justice Review, 17, 84-107.
39.
RuschG.KirchheimerO. (1939). Punishment and social structure. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
40.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SevdirenÖ. (2011). Alternatives to imprisonment in England and Wales, Germany and Turkey. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
42.
SimonJ. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. London, England: Oxford University Press.
43.
SpitzerS. (1975). Toward a Marxian theory of deviance. Social Problems, 22, 638-651.
44.
SuttonJ. R. (2004). The political economy of imprisonment in affluent Western democracies. America Sociological Review, 69, 170-189.
45.
TonryM. (2004). Punishment and politics: Evidence and emulation in the making of English crime control policy. London, England: Routledge.
46.
United Nations Development Programme. (2005-2010). Human Development Index. Available from http://www.hdr.undp.org/en
