This article examines age homophily among co-offenders, using data on approximately 440,000 co-offenses recorded by police in Canada during 2006 to 2009. Log-linear models for social mobility tables are applied to an 86-by-86 table of frequencies of co-offending among year-of-age groups for individuals from 3 to 88 years old. The results indicate strong age homophily for co-offenders of all ages, but decreasing with age. There is further structuration into four age groups: children (3-11 years), youth (12-17 years), young adults (18-45 years), and older adults (46-88 years). The “Fagin” hypothesis that offenders below the age of criminal responsibility are particularly attractive as co-offenders for older offenders is disconfirmed.
BradlowE. (1984). The children’s friend society at the Cape of Good Hope. Victorian Studies, 27, 155-177.
4.
BreigerR. L. (1981). The social class structure of occupational mobility. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 578-611.
5.
BuddT.SharpC.MayhewP. (2005). Offending in England and Wales: First results from the 2003 Crime and Justice Survey (Home Office Research Study 275). London, England: Home Office.
CarringtonP. J. (2002). Sex homogeneity in co-offending groups. In HagbergJ. (Ed.), Contributions to social network analysis, information theory, and other topics in statistics: A Festschrift in honor of Ove Frank (pp. 101-116). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University Press.
9.
CarringtonP. J. (2009). Co-offending and the development of the delinquent career. Criminology, 47, 1295-1329.
10.
FrankO.CarringtonP. J. (2007). Estimation of offending and co-offending using available data with model support. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 31, 1-46.
11.
GoodmanL. A. (1979). Multiplicative models for the analysis of occupational mobility tables and other kinds of cross-classification tables. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 804-818.
12.
HabermanS. J. (1974). The analysis of frequency data. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
HandcockM. S.HunterD. R.ButtsC. T.GoodreauS. M.MorrisM. (2008). statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24, 1-11.
14.
KrackhardtD.SternR. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123-140.
15.
LawalB. (2003). Categorical data analysis with SAS® and SPSS applications. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16.
LusherD.KoskinenJ.RobinsG. (Ed.). (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
McIntoshM. (1973). The growth of racketeering. Economy and Society, 2, 35-69.
18.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
19.
ReissA. J.FarringtonD. P. (1991). Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 360-395.
20.
RobinsG.DaraganovaG. (2013). Social selection, dyadic covariates, and geospatial effects. In LusherD.KoskinenJ.RobinsG. (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks (pp. 91-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
RobinsG.LusherD. (2013). What are exponential random graph models? In LusherD.KoskinenJ.RobinsG. (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks (pp. 9-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
SarneckiJ. (2001). Delinquent networks: Youth co-offending in Stockholm. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS/STAT® 9.2 user’s guide. Cary, NC: Author.
24.
SchaeferD. R. (2012). Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects. Social Networks, 34, 141-149.
25.
StegbauerC.RauschA. (2012). How international are international congresses?Connections, 32, 1-11.
26.
Taylor-ButtsA.BressanA. (2008). Youth crime in Canada, 2006. Juristat, 28(3), 1-15.
27.
van MastrigtS. B. (2008). Co-offending. Relationships with age, gender, and crime type (PhD dissertation). Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, UK.
28.
van MastrigtS. B.CarringtonP. J. (2014). Sex and age homophily in co-offending networks: Opportunity or preference? In MorselliC. (Ed.), Crime and networks (pp. 28-51). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
29.
van MastrigtS. B.FarringtonD. P. (2011). Prevalence and characteristics of co-offending recruiters. Justice Quarterly, 2, 325-359.
30.
WarrM. (1996). Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology, 34, 11-37.
31.
WeermanF. M. (2003). Co-offending as social exchange: Explaining characteristics of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 398-416.
