Despite the growing use of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (EGC), little is known about patients’ posttreatment experiences. We explored the postprocedure experiences of gastric cancer patients in South Korea.
Method:
A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 13 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for EGC between December 2021 and February 2022. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results:
Three themes and nine subthemes emerged from analysis: (a) feeling bewilderment in everyday decision-making, (b) the swirl of emotional turmoil, and (c) embracing the journey into the new normal.
Discussion:
Our findings highlight the need for tailored health information, particularly regarding dietary guidance, and family involvement in posttreatment care. Cultural sensitivity is crucial when supporting South Korean patients who associate cancer with personal behaviors, experience shame, or avoid disclosing their diagnosis. These insights can help health care providers guide these patients in adapting to their cancer diagnosis and managing posttreatment challenges.
AlkhaffafB.BlazebyJ. M.BruceI. A.MorrisR. L. (2020). Patient priorities in relation to surgery for gastric cancer: Qualitative interviews with gastric cancer surgery patients to inform the development of a core outcome set. BMJ Open, 10(2), e034782. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034782
CaoX. L.WangX.LiP.JuW. (2019). Psychological effects of advanced care on patients received endoscopic gastric cancer resection. Medicine, 98(41), e17497. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017497
DalhammarK.KristenssonJ.MalmströmM.RasmussenB. H. (2023). Striving towards normality in an unpredictable situation. A qualitative interview study of how persons newly diagnosed with incurable oesophageal and gastric cancer manage everyday life. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 63, 102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102302
GharagozlianS.MalaT.BrekkeH. K.KolbjørnsenL. C.UllerudÅ. A.JohnsonE. (2020). Nutritional status, sarcopenia, gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after gastrectomy for cancer—A cross-sectional pilot study. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 37, 195–201.
12.
HamashimaC.GotoR. (2017). Potential capacity of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in Japan. Cancer Science, 108(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13100
13.
HamdanN. A.Abd HamidN.Leong Bin AbdullahM. F. I. (2022). A longitudinal investigation of posttraumatic growth and its associated factors among head and neck cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 31(3), 504–511. https://doi-org.libproxy.ajou.ac.kr/10.1002/pon.5835
14.
HansenF.BerntsenG. K. R.SalamonsenA. (2018). “What matters to you?” A longitudinal qualitative study of Norwegian patients’ perspectives on their pathways with colorectal cancer. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 1548240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1548240
IrinoT.TakeuchiH.TerashimaM.WakaiT.KitagawaY. (2017). Gastric cancer in Asia: Unique features and management. American Society of Clinical Oncology Education Book, 37, 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_175228
17.
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. (2023). Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2021 (6th ed.). Gastric Cancer, 26(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8
18.
JinR.XieT.ZhangL.GongN.ZhangJ. (2021). Stigma and its influencing factors among breast cancer survivors in China: A cross-sectional study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 52, 101972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101972
19.
KangK.-G. H. (2004). Cross-cultural comparisons of face in interpersonal interaction between Koreans and Americans. Journal of Speech, Media & Communication Research, 3, 262–282.
20.
KimS. H.ParkS.KimS. J.HurM. H.LeeB. G.HanM. S. (2020). Self-management needs of breast cancer survivors after treatment: Results from a focus group interview. Cancer Nursing, 43(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000641
21.
KimT. H.KimI. H.KangS. J.ChoiM.KimB. H.EomB. W.KimB. J.MinB. H.ChoiC. I.ShinC. M.TaeC. H.GongC. S.KimD. J.ChoA. E.GongE. J.SongG. J.ImH. S.AhnH. S.LimH., . . . Development Working Groups for the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022 Task Force Team. (2023). Korean practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2022: An evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Gastric Cancer, 23(1), 3–106. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11
22.
KimY.ChoiI. J. (2022). Current status of the gastric cancer screening program in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Association, 65(5), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2022.65.5.250
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage.
25.
LeeK.KimK.LyuJ. (2022). Daseinsanalytic understanding of elderly terminal cancer patients’ death perceptions. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 42(4), 833–853. https://doi.org/10.31888/JKGS.2022.42.4.833
26.
LiH.FengL. Q.BianY. Y.YangL. L.LiuD. X.HuoZ. B.ZengL. (2019). Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with surgical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 11(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i2.161
27.
LinY.DochertyS. L.PorterL. S.BaileyD. E.Jr. (2020). Symptom experience and self-management for multiple co-occurring symptoms in patients with gastric cancer: A qualitative study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 49, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101860
28.
LincolnY.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
29.
LiuH.YangQ.NarsavageG.YangC.ChenY.XuG.WuX. (2016). Coping with stigma: The experience of Chinese patients with lung cancer. SpringPlus, 5(1), 1790. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3486-5
30.
LiuX.ZhongJ.RenJ.ZhangJ. E. (2023). The formation of stigma and its social consequences on Chinese people living with lung cancer: A qualitative study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 50(5), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.589-598
31.
MengerF.Mohammed HalimN. A.RimmerB.SharpL. (2021). Post-traumatic growth after cancer: A scoping review of qualitative research. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29(11), 7013–7027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06253-2
NielsenS.RingborgC. H.SchandlA.LagergrenP. (2021). A qualitative study exploring patient’s experiences of oesophageal cancer surgery, through their personal advice to future patients. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 54, 101983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101983
34.
NohS. H. (2016). A cure manual for gastric cancer from Dr. Noh. Health Chosun Press.
35.
O’NeillL.BennettA. E.GuinanE.ReynoldsJ. V.HusseyJ. (2021). Physical recovery in the first six months following oesophago-gastric cancer surgery. Identifying rehabilitative needs: A qualitative interview study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(10), 1396–1403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1663946
OngK. J.BackM. F.LuJ. J.ShakespeareT. S.WynneC. J. (2002). Cultural attitudes to cancer management in traditional South-East Asian patients. Australasian Radiology, 46(4), 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1673.2002.t01-1-01085.x
38.
ParkJ. Y. (2017). Qualitative case study on the coping experiences of cancer survivors in their middle years. Health and Social Welfare Review, 37(2), 525–561. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2017.37.2.525
39.
ParkJ. Y.ChoiK. S. (2013). Experience of colorectal cancer survival journeys: Born again after going through an altered self image. Asian Oncology Nursing, 13(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2013.13.3.163
40.
ParkJ. Y.PardosiJ. F.IslamM. S.RespatiT.ChowdhuryK.SealeH. (2022). What does family involvement in care provision look like across hospital settings in Bangladesh, Indonesia, and South Korea?BMC Health Services Research, 22, 922. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08278-7
41.
ParkS. C.JeongO.KangJ. H.JungM. R. (2021). Longitudinal change in health-related quality of life after total gastrectomy: Approach based on the minimally important difference. Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, 13(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.2021.13.2.43
42.
PolekC.HardieT.DeatrickJ. A. (2021). Experiences of Asian women who live in urban environments and are breast cancer survivors. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 32(6), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620988775
43.
ShinW. S.XieF.ChenB.YuP.YuJ.ToK. F.KangW. (2023). Updated epidemiology of gastric cancer in Asia: Decreased incidence but still a big challenge. Cancers, 15(9), 2639. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092639
44.
TaeC. H.ShimK. N.KimB. W.KimJ. H.HongS. J.BaikG. H.SongH. J.KimY. S.JungH. K. (2020). Comparison of subjective quality of life after endoscopic submucosal resection or surgery for early gastric cancer. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 6680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62854-7
45.
TaleghaniF.EhsaniM.FarziS.FarziS.AdibiP.MoladoostA.ShahriariM.TabakhanM. (2021). Nutritional challenges of gastric cancer patients from the perspectives of patients, family caregivers, and health professionals: A qualitative study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29, 3943–3950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05951-7
46.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
47.
WangA. W.HsuW. Y.ChangC. S. (2023). Curvilinear prediction of posttraumatic growth on quality of life: A five-wave longitudinal investigation of breast cancer survivors. Quality of Life Research, 32(11), 3185–3193. https://doi-org.libproxy.ajou.ac.kr/10.1007/s11136-023-03464-4
