Ineffective intercultural communication can occur due to inaccurate medical interpreting for limited English proficiency (LEP) patients. Research shows that Hmong patients experience poorer quality interpreter services than other LEP populations. This study’s purpose is to understand Hmong medical interpreters’ perceptions of the factors that affect their ability to make accurate medical interpretations during clinical encounters.
Method
A qualitative study was conducted with Hmong-speaking medical interpreters. The interviews were semistructured, audio recorded, and analyzed using conventional content analysis.
Results
13 interpreters aged 29 to 49 years participated in the study. Three factors affected the interpreters’ ability to make accurate medical interpretations for Hmong-speaking patients: (a) matched gender between the interpreter and patient, (b) culturally taboo topics in communicating about reproductive body parts and sexual health/activity, and (c) culture and generational language differences between interpreters and Hmong patients.
Discussion
Clinical encounters that match patient–interpreter ages, gender, and/or local culture may reduce communication barriers.
AnazawaR.IshikawaH.KiuchiT. (2012). The accuracy of medical interpretations: A pilotstudy of errors in Japanese-English interpreters during a simulated medical scenario. Translation & Interpreting, 4(1), 1-20. http://www.trans-int.org/index.php/transint/article/view/159
2.
AngelelliC. V. (2004). Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication. Cambridge University Press.
3.
BochnerS. (1982). Cultures in contact: Studies in cross-cultural interaction. Pergamon Press.
4.
BoylenS.CherianS.GillF. J.LeslieG. D.WilsonS. (2020). Impact of professional interpreters on outcomes for hospitalized children from migrant and refugee families with limited English proficiency: A systematic review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(7), 1360-1388. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00300
ChaP. Y. (2010). An introduction to Hmong culture. McFarland.
7.
CoxA.RosenbergE.Thommeret-CarrièreA. S.HuyghensL.HumbléP.LeanzaY. (2019). Using patient companions as interpreters in the Emergency Department: An interdisciplinary quantitative and qualitative assessment. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(8), 1439-1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.004
8.
Culhane-PeraK. A.HerC.HerB. (2007). “We are out of balance here”: A Hmong cultural model of diabetes. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 9(3), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-006-9029-3
9.
DuffyJ.HarmonR.RanardD. A.ThaoB.YangK.HerrP. (2004). The Hmong: An introduction to their history and culture. Center for Applied Linguistics.
10.
FadimanA. (2012). The spirit catches you and you fall down: A Hmong child, her American doctors, and the collision of two cultures. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
11.
FloresG.AbreuM.BaroneC. P.BachurR.LinH. (2012). Errors of medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences: A comparison of professional versus ad hoc versus no interpreters. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 60(5), 545-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.025
12.
FloresG.LawsM. B.MayoS. J.ZuckermanB.AbreuM.MedinaL.HardtE. J. (2003). Errors in medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences in pediatric encounters. Pediatrics, 111(1), 6-14.
13.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
14.
HartfordE. A.AndersonA. P.KleinE. J.CaglarD.CarlinK.LionK. C. (2019). The use and impact of professional interpretation in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Academic Pediatrics, 19(8), 956-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2019.07.006
15.
HassanI. (2018). Avoiding medication errors through effective communication in healthcare environment. Movement, Health & Exercise, 7(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3573437
HsiehE. (2006). Understanding medical interpreters: Reconceptualizing bilingual health communication. Health Communication, 20(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc2002_9
18.
HsiehE. (2008). “I am not a robot!” Interpreters’ views of their roles in health care settings. Qualitative Health Research, 18(10), 1367-1383. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732308323840
19.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
20.
HuaZ. (Ed). (2011). The language and intercultural communication reader. Routledge.
21.
HudelsonP. (2005). Improving patient–provider communication: insights from interpreters. Family practice, 22(3), 311-316.
22.
HullM. (2016). Medical language proficiency: A discussion of interprofessional language competencies and potential for patient risk. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 54(February), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.015
23.
JaegerF. N.PellaudN.LavilleB.KlauserP. (2019). The migration-related language barrier and professional interpreter use in primary health care in Switzerland. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4164-4
24.
KamanguA. A.JohnM. R.NyakokiS. J. (2017). Barriers to parent–child communication on sexual and reproductive health issues in East Africa: A review of qualitative research in four countries. Journal of African Studies and Development, 9(4), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.5897/JASD2016.0410
25.
KamimuraA.AshbyJ.MyersK.NourianM. M.ChristensenN. (2015). Satisfaction with healthcare services among free clinic patients. Journal of Community Health, 40(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9897-8
26.
KasbergD. J. (2013). Women’s embarrassment over answering sexual health questions [Doctoral thesis, The Ohio State University]. Knowledge Bank. https://kb.osu.edu/handle/1811/54683
27.
LeanzaY.BoivinI.RosenbergE. (2010). Interruptions and resistance: A comparison of medical consultations with family and trained interpreters. Social Science & Medicine, 70(12), 1888-1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.036
28.
LorM. (2018). Systematic review: Health promotion and disease prevention among Hmong adults in the United States. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 5(3), 638-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0410-9
29.
LorM.ChewningB. (2016). Telephone interpreter discrepancies: Videotapes of Hmong medication consultations. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 24(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12206
30.
LorM.VangX.RabagoD.BrownR. L.BackonjaM. (2020). “It hurts as if . . . ”: Pain associated language, visual characterization, and storytelling in Hmong adults. PainMedicine, 21(8), 1690-1702. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz268
31.
LorM.XiongP.SchweiR. J.BowersB. J.JacobsE. A. (2016). Limited English proficient Hmong- and Spanish-speaking patients’ perceptions of the quality of interpreter services. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 54(February), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.019
32.
MalhotraJ.RotterD.TsuiJ.LlanosA. A.BalasubramanianB. A.DemissieK. (2017). Impact of patient–provider race, ethnicity, and gender concordance on cancer screening: Findings from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers, 26(12), 1804-1811. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0660
NápolesA. M.Santoyo-OlssonJ.KarlinerL. S.GregorichS. E.Pérez-StableE. J. (2015). Inaccurate language interpretation and its clinical significance in the medical encounters of Spanish-speaking Latinos. Medical Care, 53(11), 940-947. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000422
36.
OnoN.KiuchiT.IshikawaH. (2013). Development and pilot testing of a novel education method for training medical interpreters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(3), 604-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.003
37.
PillerI. (2016). Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
38.
SchweiR. J.GuerreroN.SmallA. L.JacobsE. A. (2019). Physician perceptions of thetypes of roles interpreters play in limited English proficient pediatric encounters and howthey evaluate the quality of interpretation. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 20, e25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423618000890
39.
SchweiR. J.SchroederM.EjebeI.LorM.ParkL.XiongP.JacobsE. A. (2018). Limited English proficient patients’ perceptions of when interpreters are needed and howthe decision to utilize interpreters is made. Health Communication, 33(12), 1503-1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1372047
40.
SmithS. A. (2018). Chuukese patients, dual role interpreters, and confidentiality: Exploring clinic interpretation services for reproductive health patients. Hawai’i Journal of Medicine & Public Health, 77(4), 83.
41.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
42.
TuckerC. M.MarsiskeM.RiceK. G.NielsonJ. J.HermanK. (2011). Patient-centered culturally sensitive health care: Model testing and refinement. Health Psychology, 30(3), 342-350. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022967
WardeF.PapadakosJ.PapadakosT.RodinD.SalhiaM.GiulianiM. (2018). Plain language communication as a priority competency for medical professionals in a globalized world. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 9(2), e52-e59. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36848
45.
WhiteJ.PlompenT.TaoL.MicallefE.HainesT. (2019). What is needed in culturally competent healthcare systems? A qualitative exploration of culturally diverse patients and professional interpreters in an Australian healthcare setting. BMC Public Health, 19(1), Article 1096. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7378-9
46.
WuM. S.RawalS. (2017). “It’s the difference between life and death”: The views of professional medical interpreters on their role in the delivery of safe care to patients with limited English proficiency. PLOS ONE, 12(10), e0185659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185659
