A first attempt was made to introduce picture-based communication at a Swedish neonatal ward to facilitate communication with immigrant patients having fled their country of origin. Six members of staff were interviewed about their experiences using semi-structured dyadic interviews. Their answers were analysed using inductive content analysis, and the results were related to a theoretical framework called Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services. The staff found the pictures to be helpful in communication with refugees. They were motivated to use the pictorial support and experienced a great need for it. Two key prerequisites for successful implementation were identified: receiving training and having a person formally in charge of the implementation process.
AlmNIwabuchiMAndreasenPN. (2002) A multi-lingual augmentative communication system. In: CarbonellNStephanidisC (eds) Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. Paris: Springer-Verlag Berlin, pp. 398–408.
2.
AllwoodJ (2000) An activity-based approach to pragmatics. In: BuntHBlackB (eds) Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–80.
3.
BartramL (2016) Språkbarriärer i praktiken. En studie av arabisk och svensk vokabulär inom sjukvård och flyktingmottagande[In Swedish] [Language barriers in practice. A study of Arabic and Swedish vocabulary in the fields of health care and refugee reception]. Master’s Thesis, Department of Languages & Literatures, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
4.
BeijerJ (2016) Hur uppfattar barn, föräldrar och personal bilder som stöd för kommunikation? En pilotstudie inom barn- och ungdomspsykiatri[In Swedish] [How do children, parents and professionals perceive pictures used to support communication? A pilot study in the field of paediatric and adolescent psychiatry]. Master’s Thesis, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
5.
BeukelmanDRMirendaP (2013) Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. Paul H. Brookes Pub.
6.
BlackstoneSWPressmanH (2016) Patient communication in health care settings: new opportunities for AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication32: 69–79.
7.
DiviCKossRGSchmaltzSP. (2007) Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: a pilot study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care19(2): 60–67.
8.
EllisIHowardPLarsonA. (2005) From workshop to work practice: an exploration of context and facilitation in the development of evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing2(2): 84–93.
9.
GraneheimUHLundmanB (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today24: 105–112.
10.
HadziabdicEHeikkiläKAlbinB. (2011) Problems and consequences in the use of professional interpreters: qualitative analysis of incidents from primary healthcare. Nursing Inquiry18(3): 253–261.
JohnsonM (2004) What can we learn from drawing parallels between people who use AAC and people whose first language is not English?The Journal of Communication Matters18(2): 15–17.
13.
KalengayiFKNHurtigA-KNordstrandA. (2015) “It is a dilemma”: perspectives of nurse practitioners on health screening of newly arrived migrants. Global Health Action8: 27903. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.27903.
14.
KitsonARycroft-MaloneJHarveyG. (2008) Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Science: IS3: 1.
15.
KomHIT Refugee (2018) KomHIT Kommunikationsstöd i vårdsituationer [KomHIT Communicative support in care situations]. Available at: www.kom-hit.se/Refugee/(accessed 3 October 2018).
16.
KrippendorffK (2013) Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. London: Sage.
17.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2015) Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [Qualitative research interviews], 3rd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
18.
MeppelinkCSmitEGBuurmanBM. (2015) Should we be afraid of simple messages? The effects of text difficulty and illustrations in people with low or high health literacy. Health Communication30(12): 1181–1189.
19.
Mero-JaffeI (2011) ‘Is that what I said?’ Interview transcript approval by participants: an aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods10(3): 231–247.
20.
MorganDL (2016) Essentials of Dyadic Interviewing. London, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
21.
MorganDLEliotSLoweR. (2016) Dyadic interviews as a tool for qualitative evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation37(1): 109–117.
22.
Nkulu KalengayiFKHurtigA-KAhlmC. (2012) “It is a challenge to do it the right way”: an interpretive description of caregivers’ experiences in caring for migrant patients in Northern Sweden. BMC Health Services Research12: 433.
23.
OlssonEErikssonMAnderzén-CarlssonA (2017) Skin-to-skin contact facilitates more equal parenthood: a qualitative study from fathers’ perspective. Journal of Pediatric Nursing34: e2–e9.
24.
PatrikssonKBergMNilssonS. (2017) Communicating with parents who have difficulty understanding and speaking Swedish: an interview study with health care professionals. Journal of Neonatal Nursing23(6): 248–252.
PriebeSSandhuSDiasS. (2011) Good practice in health care for migrants: views and experiences of care professionals in 16 European countries. BMC Public Health11: 187.
27.
Rycroft-MaloneJ (2004) The PARIHS framework: a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. (Using the Best Evidence to Change Practice). Journal of Nursing Care Quality19(4): 297.
28.
Rycroft-MaloneJAHawkesCSeersK. (2013) The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework. Implementation Science8(1): 28.
StetlerCDamschroderLHelfrichC. (2011) A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implementation Science: IS6: 99.
33.
SuphanchaimatRKantamaturapojKPutthasriW. (2015) Challenges in the provision of healthcare services for migrants: a systematic review through providers’ lens. BMC Health Services Research15: 390.
34.
The Joint Commission (2007) “What did the Doctor say?”: Improving Health Literacy to Protect Patient Safety. Oakbrook Terrace: The Joint Commission.
35.
ThunbergGJohanssonMWikholmJ (2015) Meeting the communicative rights of people with Autism — using pictorial supports during assessment, intervention and hospital care. In: FitzgeraldM (ed), Autism Spectrum Disorder – Recent Advances. InTech. DOI: 10.5772/59838.
36.
ThunbergGTörnhageC-JNilssonS (2016) Evaluating the impact of AAC interventions in reducing hospitalization-related stress: challenges and possibilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication32(2): 143–150.
TrajkovskiSSchmiedVVickersM. (2012) Neonatal nurses’ perspectives of family-centred care: a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing21(17–18): 2477–2487.
39.
TurnerMChur-HansenAWinefieldH (2014) The neonatal nurses’ view of their role in emotional support of parents and its complexities. Journal of Clinical Nursing23(21-22): 3156–3165.
Vantaa BenjaminssonMThunbergGNilssonS (2015) Using picture and text schedules to inform children: effects on distress and pain during needle-related procedures in nitrous oxide sedation. Pain Research and Treatment2015: 478503.
42.
World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe (2013) Health Literacy: The Solid Facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe.
