Our experiment challenges the standard, social preference, interpretation of choices in the double blind dictator game played in the lab without any context. We present treatments formulated to minimize the social preference reasons to give and, despite this, the allocations are identical to our replication of the standard double blind game, implying that altruism might be the wrong interpretation of giving. Instead, we hypothesize that giving might be driven by participants coming to the lab ready ‘to play’. The fact that there are strong correlations between participant responses to an attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder questionnaire and both the rate and level of giving provides direct support for the hypothesis that lab participants impulsively give money away. However, we also show that having players earn their endowments attenuates the bias.
Bardsley, N.2008. ‘Dictator Game Giving: Altruism or artefact?’ . Experimental Economics11: 122-33.
2.
Ben-Ner, A. and Putterman, L.2004. ‘Reciprocity in a Two Part Dictator Game’ . Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization53: 333-52.
3.
Benz, M. and Meier, S.2005. ‘Do People Behave in Experiments as in Real Life? Evidence from donations’. University of Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics Working Paper No. 248.
4.
Bolton, G. and Katok, E.1998. ‘An Experimental Test of the Crowding Out Hypothesis: The Nature of Beneficent Behavior’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization37: 315-31.
5.
Carpenter, J. and Matthews, P.2005. ‘Norm Enforcement: Anger, Indignation, or Reciprocity’ . Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Working Paper 0503.
6.
Cherry, T., Frykblom, P. and Shogren, J.2002. ‘Hardnose the Dictator’. American Economic Review92: 1218-21.
7.
Cox, J.2004. ‘How to Identify Trust and Reciprocity’. Games and Economic Behavior46: 260-81.
8.
Eckel, C. and Grossman, P.1996. ‘Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games’. Games and Economic Behavior16: 181-91.
9.
Eckel, C. and Grossman, P.1998. ‘Are Women Less Selfish Than Men? Evidence from Dictator Experiments’. Economic Journal108: 726-35.
10.
Engelmann, D. and Strobel, M.2004. ‘Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments’. American Economic Review94: 857-69.
11.
Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U.2004. ‘Third Party Punishment and Social Norms’ . Evolution and Human Behavior25: 63-87.
12.
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.1999. ‘A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation’ . Quarterly Journal of Economics114: 769-816.
13.
Fong, C.2001. ‘Social Preferences, Self-Interest, and the Demand for Redistribution’. Journal of Public Economics82: 225.
14.
Fong, C.2005. ‘Evidence from an Experiment on Charity to Welfare Recipients: Reciprocity, Altruism and the Empathic Responsiveness Hypothesis’ . The Economic Journal117: 1008-24.
15.
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J., Savin, N. and Sefton, M.1994. ‘Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments’ . Games and Economic Behavior6: 347-69.
16.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, J. and Smith, V., 1994. ‘Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games’. Games and Economic Behavior7: 346-80.
17.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. and Smith, V.1996. ‘Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games’. American Economic Review86: 653-60.
18.
Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M.1985. ‘Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects’ Concepts of Distributive Justice’. Journal of Legal Studies14: 259-97.
19.
Konow, J.2005. ‘Mixed Feelings: Theory and Evidence of Warm Glow and Altruism’. Department of Economics, Loyola Marymount University working paper.
20.
Malloy-Diniz, L., Fuentes, D., Leite, W.Borges, Correa, H. and Bechara, A.2007. ‘Impulsive Behavior in Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Characterization of Attentional, Motor and Cognitive Impulsiveness’ . Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society13: 693-8.
21.
List, J.2007. ‘On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games’ . Journal of Political Economy115: 482-93.
22.
Roethlisberger, F. and Dickson, W.1939. Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Spraggon, J. and Oxoby, R.2008. ‘Mine and Yours: Property Rights in Dictator Games’ . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization65: 703-13.
24.
Young, S.2004. ‘The YAQ-S and YAQ-I: The Development of Self and Informant Questionnaires Reporting on Current Adult ADHD Symptomatology, Comorbid and Associated Problems’. Personality and Individual Differences36: 1211-23.
25.
Young, S. and Gudjonsson, G.2005. ‘Neuropsychological Correlates of the YAQ-S and YAQ-I Self- and Informant-Reported ADHD Symptomatology, Emotional and Social Problems and Delinquent Behavior’. British Journal of Clinical Psychology44: 47-57.
