Entrepreneurs need to access knowledge to grow, but weak entrepreneurial ecosystems tend to lack the types of knowledge that foster venture growth. To explore how entrepreneurs can act resourcefully as they overcome local ecosystem deficiencies in efforts to grow, we conducted 78 interviews with growth-oriented entrepreneurs in Central America. These entrepreneurs, perceiving that their ecosystem was subordinate to stronger ecosystems, challenged local knowledge, prompting them to engage in knowledge-related resourcefulness, which involves reorienting network targets (resourceful cognition) and assembling network tie proxies (resourceful behavior), to leverage benefits from both local and distant entrepreneurial ecosystems in pursuit of steady organic growth.
AcemogluD. (2010). Growth and institutions. In DurlaufS. N.BlumeL. E. (Eds.), Economic growth. The new palgrave economics collection (pp. 107–115). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280823_16
2.
AcsZ. J.AudretschD. B.LehmannE. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 41, 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9
3.
AldrichH. E.KimP. H. (2007). Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.8
4.
AlvarezS. A.BarneyJ. B. (2014). Entrepreneurial opportunities and poverty alleviation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12078
AshforthB. E.SchinoffB. S.RogersK. M.LangeD. (2023). Being Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: Role-based identity foils in organizational life. Organization Science, 35(1), 1–386. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1666
7.
AudretschD. B.BönteW.KeilbachM. (2008). Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.006
8.
AutioE.NambisanS.ThomasL. D. W.WrightM. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 23–28). Prentice-Hall.
11.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
12.
BanduraA. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51, 269–290.
13.
BakerT.NelsonR. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366.
14.
BaronR. A. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 167–182.
15.
BosoN.StoryV. M.CadoganJ. W. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 708–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.04.001
16.
BrownR.MasonC. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7
17.
BruhnM.KarlanD.SchoarA. (2010). What capital is missing in developing countries?American Economic Review, 100, 629–633.
18.
BrutonG.SutterC.LenzA.-K. (2021). Economic inequality—Is entrepreneurship the cause or the solution? A review and research agenda for emerging economies. Journal of Business Venturing, 36, 106095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106095
19.
CaoZ.ShiX. (2021). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 57, 75–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y
20.
CB Insights. (2023). The complete list of unicorn companies. CB Insights.
CopeJ. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 373–398.
23.
DelmarF.DavidssonP.GartnerW. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.
24.
DrexlerA.FischerG.SchoarA. (2014). Keeping it simple: Financial literacy and rules of thumb. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.2.1
25.
DroriI.HonigB.WrightM. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00332.x
26.
DubiniP.AldrichH. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 305–313.
27.
EberhartR. N.LounsburyM.AldrichH. E. (2022). Entrepreneurialism and society: New theoretical perspectives. Emerald Publishing Limited.
28.
EngelY.KaandorpM.ElfringT. (2017). Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.001
29.
FeldmanM. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15(3), 295–309.
30.
FelzenszteinC.GimmonE.AquevequeC. (2013). Entrepreneurship at the periphery: Exploring framework conditions in core and peripheral locations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00515.x
31.
FisherG. (2023). Resourcefulness enactment: The sensemaking process underpinning resourceful actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(4), 911–940.
32.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Sage.
33.
GalakJ.GrayK.ElbertI.StrohmingerN. (2016). Trickle-down preferences: preferential conformity to high status peers in fashion choices. PLoS One, 11, e0153448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153448
34.
GiannettiV.RuberaG. (2020). Innovation for and from emerging countries: A closer look at the antecedents of trickle-down and reverse innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 987–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00669-3
35.
GehmanJ.GlaserV. L.EisenhardtK. M.GioiaD.LangleyA.CorleyK. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27, 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029
36.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor [GEM] (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2022/2023 global report: Adapting to a “New Normal.”GEM.
37.
GilbertB. A.McDougallP. P.AudretschD. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950.
38.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
39.
GodefroidtA.LangerA.MeulemanB. (2017). Developing political trust in a developing country: The impact of institutional and cultural factors on political trust in Ghana. Democratization, 24, 906–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1248416
40.
GodleyA.MorawetzN.SogaL. (2021). The complementarity perspective to the entrepreneurial ecosystem taxonomy. Small Business Economics, 56, 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00197-y
41.
GrantR. M. (1997). The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice. Long Range Planning, 30, 450–454.
42.
GrimmM.KnorringaP.LayJ. (2012). Constrained gazelles: High potentials in West Africa’s informal economy. World Development, 40, 1352–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.009
43.
HallenB. L.EisenhardtK. M. (2012). Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 35–70. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0620
44.
HayekF. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.
45.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
46.
HiteJ. M.HesterlyW. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 22, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.156
47.
HuhnS. (2017). Punitive populism and fear of crime in Central America. In MythenG.LeeM. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook on fear of crime. Routledge.
JarilloJ. C. (1989). Entrepreneurship and growth: The strategic use of external resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 133–147.
50.
JosephJ.WilsonA. J. (2018). The growth of the firm: An attention-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1779–1800.
51.
JovanovicB.RobR. (1989). The growth and diffusion of knowledge. The Review of Economic Studies, 56(4), 569–582.
52.
KasabovE. (2015). Start–up difficulties in early–stage peripheral clusters: The case of it in an emerging economy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 727–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12058
53.
KierA. S.McMullenJ. S. (2018). Entrepreneurial imaginativeness in new venture ideation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2265–2295.
54.
KirchhoffB. A.NewbertS. L.HasanI.ArmingtonC. (2007). The influence of university R&D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 543–559.
55.
LafuenteE.ÁcsZ. J.SzerbL. (2022). A composite indicator analysis for optimizing entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, Uncommon Methods and Metrics for Local Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, 51, 104379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104379
56.
LarsonA. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393534
57.
LefebvreV.Radu LefebvreM.SimonE. (2015). Formal entrepreneurial networks as communities of practice: A longitudinal case study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27, 500–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1070539
58.
McKelvieA.WiklundJ. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261–288.
MichaelisT. L.CarrJ. C.ScheafD. J.PollackJ. M. (2020). The frugal entrepreneur: A self-regulatory perspective of resourceful entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105969.
61.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
62.
MuñozP.KimmittJ.SpigelB. (2023). Trans-contextual work: Doing entrepreneurial contexts in the periphery. Small Business Economics, 62(2), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00772-4
63.
MurphyA.TuckerH. (2023). The Global 2000, 2023, The Global 2000. Forbes.
64.
NaudéW. A. (2011). Entrepreneurship is not a binding constraint on growth and development in the poorest countries. World Development, 39, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.05.005
65.
NewbertS. L.TornikoskiE. T.QuigleyN. R. (2013). Exploring the evolution of supporter networks in the creation of new organizations. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.09.003
OzgenE.BaronR. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.12.001
68.
PenroseE. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Sharpe.
69.
Perez-AlemanP. (2011). Collective learning in global diffusion: Spreading quality standards in a developing country cluster. Organization Science, 22, 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0514
70.
PhillipsN.TraceyP.KarraN. (2013). Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily: The role of narrative identity work in venture creation and early growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 134–150.
PortesA.GuarnizoL. E.HallerW. J. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 278–298.
73.
QinF.WrightM.GaoJ. (2017). Are “sea turtles” slower? Returnee entrepreneurs, venture resources and speed of entrepreneurial entry. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 694–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.08.003
74.
ReypensL.BacqS.MilanovH. (2021). Beyond bricolage: Early-stage technology venture resource mobilization in resource-scarce contexts. Journal of Business Venturing, 36, 106110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106110
75.
SaxenianA. (1990). Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33, 89–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166640
76.
SchoarA. (2010). The divide between subsistence and transformational entrepreneurship. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 10, 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1086/605853
77.
SchouP. K.BucherE.WaldkirchM. (2022). Entrepreneurial learning in online communities. Small Business Economics, 58, 2087–2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00502-8
78.
ScurD.SadunR.Van ReenenJ.LemosR.BloomN. (2021). The World Management Survey at 18: Lessons and the way forward. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37, 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grab009
79.
ShaneS. A. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.
80.
SharmaP. (2011). Country of origin effects in developed and emerging markets: Exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.16
81.
SoetantoD. (2017). Networks and entrepreneurial learning: Coping with difficulties. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23, 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0230
82.
SonensheinS.NaultK. (2023). When the symphony does Jazz: How resourcefulness fosters organizational resilience during adversity. Academy of Management Journal, 67(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0988
83.
SonensheinS. (2014). How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 814–848.
84.
SpigelB. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
85.
SpigelB.HarrisonR. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268
SteffensP. R.BakerT.DavidssonP.SenyardJ. M. (2023). When is less more? Boundary conditions of effective entrepreneurial bricolage. Journal of Management, 49(4), 1277–1311.
88.
StevensonH.JarilloJ. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.
89.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (p. 273). Sage Publications.
90.
SutterC. J.WebbJ. W.KistruckG. M.BaileyA. V. G. (2013). Entrepreneurs’ responses to semi-formal illegitimate institutional arrangements. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.03.001
91.
van RijnsoeverF. J. (2020). Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 49, 103884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103884
92.
VissaB. (2012). Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organization Science, 23, 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0567
93.
VissaB. (2011). A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 137–158. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215084
94.
WelterF.XhenetiM.SmallboneD. (2018). Entrepreneurial resourcefulness in unstable institutional contexts: European Union borderlands. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12, 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1274
95.
WilliamsT. A.ZhaoE. Y.SonensheinS.UcbasaranD.GeorgeG. (2021). Breaking boundaries to creatively generate value: The role of resourcefulness in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36, 106141.
96.
WilliamsT. A.LiJ. M.ZhaoE. Y. (2024). Theorizing the domain of entrepreneurial resourcefulness: Theoretical foundations, integrative review, and research agenda (Working paper).
97.
World Bank. (2021). World Bank Open Data [WWW Document]. World Bank Open Data. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://data.worldbank.org
98.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Global social mobility index 2020. Geneva, Switzerland.
99.
World Intellectual Property Office [WIPO]. Website. Retrieved October 28, 2023, from https://www.wipo.int
WurthB.StamE.SpigelB. (2021). Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 729–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948
102.
XuL.YangS.LiuY.NewbertS. L.BoalK. (2023). Seeing the forest and the trees: Exploring the effects of inter- and intra-entrepreneurial ecosystem factors on new venture creation. Academy of Management Journal, 66(6), forthcoming.
