Research studying employment before, during, and after spells of entrepreneurship is growing in both popularity and importance for understanding the antecedents and consequences of entrepreneurship. However, methodological challenges (e.g., retrospective bias, limitations of archival data sources) hinder further development and refinement. The Occupational Information Network, better known as O*Net, is a database of occupational characteristics that is scarcely used in entrepreneurship research, yet can help scholars overcome these challenges. In this article, I provide a brief primer on O*Net, illustrate how it can be used to advance entrepreneurship research, and offer summaries of best practices.
AguinisH.BradleyK. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952
2.
AguinisH.LawalS. O. (2012). Conducting field experiments using eLancing’s natural environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.01.002
3.
AguinisH.RamaniR. S.AlabduljaderN. (2023). Best-practice recommendations for producers, evaluators, and users of methodological literature reviews. Organizational Research Methods, 26, 46–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120943281
4.
AlaybekB.WangY.DalalR. S.DubrowS.BoemermanL. S. (2022). The relations of reflective and intuitive thinking styles with task performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 75(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12443
AzoulayP.JonesB. F.KimJ. D.MirandaJ. (2020). Age and high-growth entrepreneurship. American Economic Review: Insights, 2, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20180582
7.
BarnesC. M.DangC. T.LeavittK.GuaranaC. L.UhlmannE. L. (2018). Archival data in micro-organizational research: A toolkit for moving to a broader set of topics. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1453–1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315604188
8.
BaronR. A. (2010). Job design and entrepreneurship: Why closer connections = mutual gains. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 370–378.
9.
BaronR. A.HmieleskiK. M.HenryR. A. (2012). Entrepreneurs’ dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits–and potential costs–of being “up.”Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.002
10.
BernerthJ. B.AguinisH. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12103
11.
BotelhoT. L.ChangM. (2023). The evaluation of founder failure and success by hiring firms: A field experiment. Organization Science, 34(1), 484–508. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1592
12.
BurtonM. D.SørensenJ. B.DobrevS. D. (2016). A careers perspective on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12230
13.
CableD. M.JudgeT. A. (1997). Interviewers’ perceptions of person—organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.546
14.
CampionM. A. (2023). SIOP distinguished professional contributions award (2023): “Stories of Discovery in the Pursuit of Practice.”The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 61(1).
15.
CarrJ. C.MarshallD. R.MichaelisT. L.PollackJ. M.SheatsL. (2022). The role of work-to-venture role conflict on hybrid entrepreneurs’ transition into entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(5), 2302–2325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2082455
16.
Chung-YanG. A. (2010). The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019823
17.
DavidssonP. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002
18.
DenckerJ. C.GruberM.ShahS. K. (2009). Individual and opportunity factors influencing job creation in new firms. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.47084648
DierdorffE. C.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Consensus in work role requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1228–1241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1228
21.
DierdorffE. C.MorgesonF. P. (2013). Getting what the occupation gives: Exploring multilevel links between work design and occupational values. Personnel Psychology, 66, 687–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12023
22.
DierdorffE. C.RubinR. S.MorgesonF. P. (2009). The milieu of managerial work: An integrative framework linking work context to role requirements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 972–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015456
23.
DillonE. W.StantonC. T. (2017). Self-employment dynamics and the returns to entrepreneurship. No. w23168. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23168
24.
DouglasE. J.ShepherdD. A. (2002). Self-employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870202600305
25.
DunlopP. D.BourdageJ. S.de VriesR. E.McNeillI. M.JorritsmaK.OrchardM.AustenT.BainesT.ChoeW.-K. (2020). Liar! Liar! when stakes are higher: Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 784–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000463
26.
EckhardtJ. T.ShaneS. (2010). An update to the individual-opportunity nexus. In AcsZ. J.AudrestchD. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (3rd ed., pp. 47–76). Springer.
27.
EdwardsJ. R.RothbardN. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791609
28.
FeldmanM. P.OzcanS.ReichsteinT. (2019). Falling not far from the tree: Entrepreneurs and organizational heritage. Organization Science, 30, 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1222
29.
FengJ.AllenD. G.SeibertS. E. (2022). Once an entrepreneur, always an entrepreneur? Entrepreneurial identity, job characteristics, and voluntary turnover of former entrepreneurs in paid employment. Personnel Psychology, 75, 179–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12455
FreemanJ. H. (1986). Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, 1, 33–52.
GajendranR. S.HarrisonD. A.Delaney-KlingerK. (2015). Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting’s effects on performance via I-deals and job resources. Personnel Psychology, 68, 353–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12082
34.
GlombT. M.Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D.RotundoM. (2004). Emotional labor demands and compensating wage differentials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 700–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.700
35.
Gonzalez-MuléE.AguinisH. (2018). Advancing theory by assessing boundary conditions with metaregression: A critical review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management, 44, 2246–2273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317710723
36.
GrandeyA. A.ChiN. W.DiamondJ. A. (2013). Show me the money! Do financial rewards for performance enhance or undermine the satisfaction from emotional labor?Personnel Psychology, 66, 569–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12037
37.
GrantA. M.ShandellM. S. (2022). Social motivation at work: The organizational psychology of effort for, against, and with others. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060321033406
38.
GruberM.DenckerJ. C.NikiforouA. (2023). How founder human capital and founding conditions shape new firm performance: A study of necessity entrepreneurship during times of economic crisis. Academy of Management Journal, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0405
39.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Addison-Wesley.
40.
HaltiwangerJ.JarminR. S.MirandaJ. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00288
41.
HardyW.KeisterR.LewandowskiP. (2018). Educational upgrading, structural change and the task composition of jobs in Europe. Economics of Transition, 26, 201–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12145
42.
HeidemeierH.MoserK. (2009). Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.94.2.353
43.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
44.
HoraS.BaduraK. L.LemoineG. J.GrijalvaE. (2022). A meta-analytic examination of the gender difference in creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 1926–1950. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000999
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E.LockeE. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.237
47.
JudgeT. A.LivingstonB. A. (2008). Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation, and earnings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.994
48.
JudgeT. A.WoolfE. F.HurstC. (2009). Is emotional labor more difficult for some than for others? A multilevel, experience-sampling study. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01129.x
49.
JudgeT. A.ZapataC. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1149–1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837
50.
KacperczykO.YounkinP. (2022). A founding penalty: Evidence from an audit study on gender, entrepreneurship, and future employment. Organization Science, 33(2), 716–745. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1456
51.
KaiserU.Malchow-MøllerN. (2011). Is self-employment really a bad experience? The effects of previous self-employment on subsequent wage-employment wages. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.02.001
52.
KellerJ. R.KehoeR. R.BidwellM.CollingsD.MyerA. (2021). In with the old? Examining when boomerang employees outperform new hires. Academy of Management Journal, 64, 1654–1684. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1340
53.
KimJ.BurtonM. D. (2022). People management in entrepreneurial firms. In SchererP. D. (Ed.), A research agenda for strategic human resource management: Bringing variety in forms, theory, methodology and outcomes (pp. 195–216). Edward Elgar.
54.
KimP. H.LongestK. C. (2014). You can’t leave your work behind: Employment experience and founding collaborations. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.10.002
55.
KohnM. L.SchoolerC. (1969). Class, occupation, and orientation. American Sociological Review, 34(5), 659–678. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092303
56.
KüsshauerA.BaumM. (2023). The good, the bad and the uncertain: Employers’ perceptions of former entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 38, 106270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106270
57.
LaffineurC.BarbosaS. D.FayolleA.MontmartinB. (2020). The unshackled entrepreneur: Occupational determinants of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of Business Venturing, 35, 105983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105983
58.
LaPoliceC.CarterG. W.JohnsonJ. W. (2008). Linking O*NET descriptors to occupational literacy requirements using job component validation. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 405–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00118.x
59.
LastJ. M. (2000). A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford University Press.
LordanG.PischkeJ. S. (2022). Does Rosie like riveting? Male and female occupational choices. Economica, 89, 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12390
63.
MahieuJ.MelilloF.ThompsonP. (2022). The long-term consequences of entrepreneurship: Earnings trajectories of former entrepreneurs. Strategic Management Journal, 43, 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3337
64.
MathiasB. D.WilliamsD. W. (2018). Giving up the hats? Entrepreneurs’ role transitions and venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.007
65.
MathiasB. D.WilliamsD. W.SmithA. R. (2015). Entrepreneurial inception: The role of imprinting in entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.004
MeurisJ.EliasA. (2023). Task interdependence and the gender wage gap: The role of the gender composition of an occupation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(4), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2677
68.
MeurisJ.GladstoneJ. (2023). Contextual inequality in the performance costs of financial precarity. Journal of Management, 01492063231153136. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231153136
69.
MmbagaN. A.LermanM. P.MunyonT. P.LanivichS. E. (2023). Juggling act: Waged time investments and the health–wealth trade-off. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113695
70.
MooreD. A.CainD. M. (2007). Overconfidence and underconfidence: When and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.002
MorgesonF. P.HumphreyS. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire WDQ: Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
73.
OldhamG. R.FriedY. (2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.002
PetersonN. G.MumfordM. D.BormanW. C.JeanneretP. R.FleishmanE. A.LevinK. Y.CampionM. A.MayfieldM. S.MorgesonF. P.PearlmanK.GowingM. K.LancasterR. A.SilverM. B.DyeD. M. (2001). Understanding work using the occupational information network O* NET: Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00100.x
77.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
78.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2016). Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 159–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115624965
79.
PollockT. G.LeeP. M.JinK.LashleyK. (2015). (Un) tangled: Exploring the asymmetric coevolution of new venture capital firms’ reputation and status. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 482–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215585602
80.
PorterM. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. Free Press.
81.
RaffieeJ.FengJ. (2014). Should I quit my day job? A hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 936–963. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0522
82.
RehS.WieckC.ScheibeS. (2021). Experience, vulnerability, or overload? Emotional job demands as moderator in trajectories of emotional well-being and job satisfaction across the working lifespan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106, 1734–1749. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000859
83.
SackettP. R.LaczoR. M. (2003). Job and work analysis. Handbook of Psychology, 12, 21–37.
84.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
ShawJ. D.GuptaN. (2004). Job complexity, performance, and well-being: When does supplies-values fit matter?Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 847–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00008.x
87.
ShepherdD. A. (2019). Researching the dark side, downside, and destructive side of entrepreneurship: It is the compassionate thing to do!Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(3), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0194
88.
ShepherdD. A.SeybS.SouitarisV. (2023). On the edge of destruction: An impaired-regulation model of destructive entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management, 01492063221126710. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221126710
89.
SitzmannT.PloyhartR. E.KimY. (2019). A process model linking occupational strength to attitudes and behaviors: The explanatory role of occupational personality heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000352
90.
SørensenJ. B. (2007). Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.387
91.
SpeachM. E. P.BaduraK. L.BlumT. C. (2023). Everything is negotiable, but not for everyone: The role of disability in compensation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(4), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001039
92.
SwabR. G.JohnsonP. D. (2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competition and competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2340
ThompsonK. W.SikoraD. M.PerrewéP. L.FerrisG. R. (2015). Employment qualifications, person–job fit, underemployment attributions, and hiring recommendations: A three-study investigation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12112
96.
ThorgrenS.SirénC.NordströmC.WincentJ. (2016). Hybrid entrepreneurs’ second-step choice: The nonlinear relationship between age and intention to enter full-time entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2015.12.001
97.
UrbigD.ReifK.LengsfeldS.ProcherV. D. (2021). Promoting or preventing entrepreneurship? Employers’ perceptions of and reactions to employees’ entrepreneurial side jobs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121032
98.
Van LanckerE.KnockaertM.CollewaertV.BreugstN. (2023). Preparing for scaling: A study on founder role evolution. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(4), 106315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106315
99.
ViljamaaA.VaramäkiE.Joensuu-SaloS. (2017). Best of both worlds? Persistent hybrid entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 25, 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495817500133
100.
WaddinghamJ.ZacharyM. A.WalkerH. J. (2022). Burning up on reentry: The effect of entrepreneurial exit in the hiring context. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F01492063221117119
101.
WilleB.De FruytF.De ClercqB. (2013). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of five-factor model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66, 173–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12016
102.
WilliamsD. W.WoodM. S.MitchellJ. R.UrbigD. (2019). Applying experimental methods to advance entrepreneurship research: On the need for and publication of experiments. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.12.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
