This study revisits the well-established notion that large and mature organizations stifle an employee’s ability and motivation to become an entrepreneur. Using unique data on U.S. mutual funds founded between 1979 and 2005, I examine whether large and mature firms, which are typically associated with lower individual rates of entrepreneurship, are also associated with lower individual rates of intrapreneurship. The findings show that, though employees in large and mature organizations are less likely to transition to entrepreneurship, they nonetheless exhibit a higher propensity to pursue venturing opportunities inside the established firm than employees in smaller and younger firms. The results suggest that the observed negative effect of large, mature organizations on entrepreneurship arises partly due to high rates of intrapreneurship and that the stultification processes in such organizations are far less important than has been generally assumed.
AntonJ. J.YaoD. A.1995 “Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11: 362–378.
3.
AudiaP. G.RiderC. I.2006 “Entrepreneurs as organizational products revisited.” In BaumR.FreseM.BaronR. (eds.), The Psychology of Entrepreneurship: 113–130. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BarM.CiccotelloC.RuenziS.2010 “Risk management and team-managed mutual funds.” Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 4 (1): 57–73.
5.
BaronJ. N.Davis-BlakeA.BielbyW.1986 “The structure of opportunity: How promotion ladders vary within and among organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 248–273.
6.
BendixR.1956Work and Authority in Industry. New York: Wiley.
7.
BlauP. M.SchoenherrR. A.1971The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
8.
BlossfeldH.-P.RohwerG.1995Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
BoekerW.1989 “Strategic change: The effects of founding and history.” Academy of Management Journal, 32: 489–515.
10.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.JonesB. S.2004Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BowerJ. L.1970Managing the Resource Allocation Process. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
12.
BrittainJ. W.FreemanJ. H.1986 “Entrepreneurship in the semiconductor industry.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
13.
BurgelmanR. A.1983a “A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223–244.
14.
BurgelmanR. A.1983b “Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study.” Management Science, 29: 1349–1364.
15.
BurgelmanR. A.1984 “Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms.” California Management Review, 26 (3): 154–166.
16.
BurgelmanR. A.1991 “Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research.” Organization Science, 2: 239–262.
17.
BurgelmanR. A.SaylesL. R.1986Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure, and Management Skills. New York: Free Press.
18.
BurnsT.StalkerG. M.1961The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
19.
CarrollG. R.MayerK. U.1986 “Job-shift patterns in the Federal Republic of Germany: The effects of social class, industrial sector, and organizational size.” American Sociological Review, 51: 323–341.
20.
ChevalierJ.EllisonG.1999 “Career concerns of mutual fund managers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 389–432.
21.
ChristensenC. M.1997The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
22.
ChristensenC. M.RaynorM.2003The Innovator’s Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
23.
CohenW.LevinthalD.1990 “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 28–152.
24.
CohenW. M.KlepperS.1996 “Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78: 232–243.
25.
CoxD. R.1972 “Regression models and life tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34: 187–220.
26.
CoxD. R.OakesD.1984Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall.
27.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G.1963A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
DamanpourF.1992 “Organizational size and innovation.” Organization Studies, 13: 375–402.
DewarR. D.DuttonJ. E.1986 “The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis.” Management Science, 32: 1422–1433.
31.
DixonW. J.1960 “Simplified estimation from censored normal samples.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 31: 385–391.
32.
DobrevS. D.BarnettW. P.2005 “Organizational roles and the transition to entrepreneurship.” Academy of Management Journal, 48: 433–449.
33.
ElfenbeinD. W.HamiltonB. H.ZengerR. Z.2010 “The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers.” Management Science, 56: 659–681.
34.
EvansR. B.2010 “Mutual fund incubation.” Journal of Finance, 65: 1581–1611.
35.
FrostP. J.EgriC. P.1991 “The political process of innovation.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 13: 229–295. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
GarvinD. A.1983 “Spin-offs and the new firm formation process.” California Management Review, 25 (2): 3–20.
38.
GerberM.2005Start a Successful Mutual Fund: The Step-by-step Reference Guide to Make It Happen. Moraga, CA: JV Books.
39.
GompersP.LernerJ.ScharfsteinD. S.2005 “Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999.” Journal of Finance, 60: 577–614.
40.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR.2006 “Introduction.” In GreenwoodR.SuddabyR.McDougaldM. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 24: Professional Service Organizations: 1–16. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41.
GroysbergB.2010Chasing Stars: The Myth of Talent and the Portability of Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
GroysbergB.AbrahamsR.2006 “Lift outs: How to acquire a high-functioning team.” Harvard Business Review, 84 (12): 133–140.
43.
GroysbergB.LeeL. E.2009 “Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms.” Organization Science, 20: 740–758.
44.
GroysbergB.NandaA.PratsJ. M.2009 “Does individual performance affect entrepreneurial mobility? Empirical evidence from the financial analysis market.” Journal of Financial Transformation, 25: 95–106.
45.
HavemanH. A.CohenL. E.1994 “The ecological dynamics of careers: The impact of organizational founding, dissolution, and merger on job mobility.” American Journal of Sociology, 100: 104–152.
46.
HellmanT.2007 “When do employees become entrepreneurs?” Management Science, 53: 919–933.
47.
HendersonR.1993 “Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry.” RAND Journal of Economics, 24: 248–270.
48.
HendersonR. M.ClarkK. B.1990 “Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technology and the failure of established firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9–31.
JelinekM.1979Institutionalizing Innovation. New York: Praeger.
51.
JelinekM.SchoonhovenC. B.1990The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
KacperczykA.2012a “Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry.” Organization Science (forthcoming).
53.
KacperczykA.2012b “Female entrepreneurship and alternative career advancement in the firm.” MIT Sloan School of Management working paper.
54.
KallebergA. L.Van BurenM. E.1996 “Is bigger better? Explaining the relationship between organizations’ size and job rewards.” American Sociological Review, 61: 47–66.
55.
KanterR. M.1983The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
56.
KanterR. M.1988 “When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations.” In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10: 169–211. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57.
KirznerI. M.1973Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
KohnM. L.SchoolerC.1982 “Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of their reciprocal effects.” American Journal of Sociology, 87: 1257–1286.
59.
KostovetskyL2010 “Brain drain: Are mutual funds losing their best minds?” University of Rochester School of Business working paper.
60.
LazearE. P.2004 “Balanced skills and entrepreneurship.” American Economic Review, 94: 208–211.
61.
LazearE. P.2005 “Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Labor Economics, 23: 649–680.
62.
LinD. Y.WeiL. J.1989 “The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84: 1047–1078.
63.
LumpkinG. T.DessG. G.1996 “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance.” Academy of Management Review, 12: 135–172.
64.
MarchJ. G.1988 “Wild ideas: The catechism of heresy.” Stanford Magazine, Spring.
65.
MarchJ. G.1991 “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science, 2: 71–87.
66.
MassaM.ReuterJ.ZitzewitzE.2010 “When should firms share credit with employees? Evidence from anonymously managed mutual funds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 95: 400–424.
67.
McFaddenD. L.1973 “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior.” In ZarembkaP. (ed.), Frontiers of Econometrics: 105–142. New York: Academic Press.
68.
MertonR. K.1968 “Bureaucratic structure and personality.” In MertonR. K., Social Theory and Social Structure, 2d ed.: 249–260. New York: Free Press.
69.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
70.
PalmiterA. R.TahaA.2009 “Star creation: Incubation of mutual funds.” Vanderbilt Law Review, 62: 1485–1534.
71.
PenroseE. T.1959The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley.
72.
PierceJ. L.DelbecqA. L.1977 “Organizational structure, individual attitudes and innovation.” Academy of Management Review, 2: 27–37.
73.
PinchotG.1985Intrapreneuring: Why You Don’t Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur. New York: Harper and Row.
74.
PinchotG.1987 “Innovation through intrapreneuring.” Research Management, 13: 14–19.
75.
QuinnB.1980Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
76.
RaoH.DrazinR.2002 “Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1986-94.” Academy of Management Journal, 45: 491–507.
77.
SaxenianA.1994Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston: Harvard University Press.
78.
SchumpeterJ. A.1934The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
SchumpeterJ. A.1942Capitalist, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
80.
SchumpeterJ. A.1950Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.
81.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS.2000 “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research.” Academy of Management Review, 25: 217–226.
82.
SmithE. B.2011 “Intermediaries, mediators, and market change.” University of Michigan working paper.
83.
SørensenJ. B.2007 “Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 387–412.
84.
SørensenJ. B.FassiottoM. A.2011 “Organizations as fonts of entrepreneurship.” Organization Science, 22: 1322–1331.
von HippelE.1977 “The dominant role of the user in semiconductor and electronic subassembly process innovation.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-24: 60–71.
95.
WeberM.1968Economy and Society. Trans. and ed. by G. Roth and C. Wittich. New York: Bedminster Press.
96.
WhyteW.1956The Organization Man. New York: Doubleday.
97.
WrigleyL.1970 “Divisional autonomy and diversification.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
98.
ZahraS. A.1991 “Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study.” Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 259–285.
99.
ZahraS. A.JenningsD. F.KuratkoD. F.1999 “The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24: 45–65.
