The Silicon Valley Syndrome

Abstract

How does expansion in the high-tech sector influence the broader economy of a region? We demonstrate that an infusion of venture capital in a region leads to: (i) declines in the number of establishments and in employment in non–high-tech industries in the tradable sector; (ii) increases in entry and in employment in the non-tradable sector; and (iii) a rise in income inequality in the non-tradable sector. Expansion in the high-tech sector therefore leads to a less diverse tradable sector and to increasing inequality in the region.

Keywords

geography entrepreneurial finance inequality research methods venture capital

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

Athey

Imbens

G. W.

Wooldridge

(2017). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? arXiv: 1710.02926v2.

Agrawal

Cockburn

(2003). The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1227–1253.

Allcott

Keniston

(2018). Dutch disease or agglomeration? The local economic effects of natural resource booms in modern America. Review of Economic Studies, 85(2), 695–731.

Andersson

Klaesson

Larsson

J. P.

(2014). The sources of the urban wage premium by worker skills: Spatial sorting or agglomeration economies? Papers in Regional Science, 93(4), 727-747.

Atems

Shand

(2018). An empirical analysis of the relationship between entrepreneurship and income inequality. Small Business Economics, 51(4), 905–922.

Bacolod

Blum

B. S.

Strange

W. C.

(2009). Skills in the city. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(2), 136–153.

Bapuji

Ertug

Shaw

J. D.

(2020). Organizations and societal economic inequality: A review and way forward. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 60–91.

Barr

(2019). An RV camp sprang up outside Google’s headquarters. Now Mountain View wants to ban it. Bloomberg.

Beine

Coulombe

Vermeulen

W. N.

(2015). Dutch disease and the mitigation effect of migration: Evidence from Canadian provinces. Economic Journal, 125(589), 1574–1615.

10.

Bernstein

Colonnelli

Malacrino

McQuade

(2019). “Who creates new firms when local opportunities arise?" Working paper. Stanford University.

11.

Bernstein

Giroud

Townsend

(2016). The impact of venture capital monitoring. Journal of Finance, 71(2016), 1591–1622.

12.

Bertoni

Colombo

M. G.

Grilli

(2011). Venture capital financing and the growth of high-tech start-ups: Disentangling treatment from selection effects. Research Policy, 40(7), 1028–1043.

13.

Bloom

(2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685.

14.

Butler

A. W.

Fauver

Spyridopoulos

(2019). Local economic spillover effects of stock market listings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54(3), 1025–1050.

15.

Chemmanaur

T. J.

Krishnan

Nandy

D. K.

(2011). How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A look beneath the surface. Review of Financial Studies, 24(12), 4037–4090.

16.

Chowdhury

Audretsch

D. B.

Belitski

(2019). Institutions and entrepreneurship quality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 51-81.

17.

Colombo

M. G.

D’Adda

Quas

(2019). The geography of venture capital and entrepreneurial ventures’ demand for external equity. Research Policy, 48(5), 1150-1170.

18.

Corden

W. M.

(1984). Booming sector and Dutch Disease economics: Survey and consolidation. Oxford Economics Papers, 36(3), 359-380.

19.

Corden

W. M.

Neary

J. P.

(1982). Booming sector and de-industrialization in a small open economy. Economic Journal, 92(368), 825-848.

20.

Correia

(2017). Linear models with high-dimensional fixed effects: an efficient and feasible estimator. Boston College. Technical report.

21.

Council

B. A.

(2019). Unicorns prancing in the Bay area. https://www.bayareacouncil.org/uncategorized/unicorns-prancing-in-the-bay-area/. Originally accessed January 22, 2021

22.

Dahl

M. S.

Sorenson

(2009). The embedded entrepreneur. European Management Review, 6(3), 172–181.

23.

Dahl

M. S.

Sorenson

(2010). The social attachment to place. Social Forces, 89(2), 633–658.

24.

Davila

Foster

Gupta

(2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689–708.

25.

Decker

R. A.

McCollum

Upton

G. B.

(2017). Firm dynamics and local economic shocks: Evidence from the shale oil and gas boom. Federal Reserve Board. Working paper.

26.

Delgado

Porter

M. E.

Scott

(2014). Defining clusters of related industries. NBER Working Paper 20375.

27.

Deloof

La Rocca

Vanacker

(2019). Local banking development and the use of debt financing by new firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(6), 1250–1276.

28.

Echeverri-Carroll

Ayala

S. G.

(2009). Wage differentials and the spatial concentration of high-technology industries. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 623–641.

29.

Ellman

(1981). Natural gas, restructuring and re-industrialization: The Dutch experience of industrial policy. In Barker

Brailovsky

(Eds.), Oil or Industry? Academic Press.

30.

Fairlie

R. W.

Chatterji

A. K.

(2013). High-technology entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 22(2), 365–389.

31.

Figueiredo

Guimaraes

Douglas

(2002). Home-field advantage: Location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 341–361.

32.

Florida

(2000). The Creative Class. Routledge.

33.

Florida

Kenney

(1988). Venture capital and high technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(4), 301–319.

34.

Glaeser

E. L.

Kolko

Saiz

(2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(1), 27-50.

35.

Glaeser

E. L.

Resseger

M. G.

(2010). The complementarity between cities and skills. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 221–244.

36.

Goldsmith-Pinkham

Sorkin

Swift

(2020). Bartik instruments: What, when, why, and how. American Economic Review, 110(8), 2586-2624.

37.

Gompers

P. A

Lerner

(2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 145–168.

38.

Guzman

Stern

(2015). Where is Silicon Valley? Science, 347(6222), 606-609.

39.

Gylfason

Herbertsson

T. T.

Zoega

(1999). A mixed blessing: Natural resources and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 3(2), 204-225.

40.

Halvarsson

Korpi

Wennberg

(2018). Entrepreneurship and income inequality. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 145(1), 275-293.

41.

Harding

Stefanski

Toews

(2020). Boom goes price: Giant resource discoveries and real exchange rate appreciation. Economic Journal, 130(630), 1715–1728.

42.

Hellmann

T. F.

Puri

(2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of startup firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 169–197.

43.

Helpman

Itskhoki

Redding

(2010). Inequality and unemployment in a global economy. Econometrica, 78(4), 1239-1283.

44.

Henrekson

Sanandaji

(2020). Measuring entrepreneurship: Do established metrics capture Schumpeterian entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(4), 733-760.

45.

Jackson

(2018). Regulation, land constraints, and California’s boom and bust. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 68(1), 130-147.

46.

Kaplan

S. N.

Lerner

(2017). Venture capital data: Opportunities and challenges. In Measuring Entrepreneurial Businesses: Current Knowledge and Challenges. University of Chicago Press.

47.

Kemeny

Osman

(2018). The wider impacts of high-technology employment: Evidence from US cities. Research Policy, 47(9), 1729-1740.

48.

Kendall

Castaneda

(2019). In Bay Area, small retail struggles while tech booms. The Mercury News.

49.

Kenney

(Ed.). (2000). Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford University Press.

50.

Klepper

(2010). The origin and growth of industry clusters: The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 15–32.

51.

Kolympiris

Hoenen

Kalaitzandonakes

(2018). Geographic distance between venture capitalists and target firms and the value of quality signals. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(1), 189–220.

52.

Komarek

T. M.

(2018). Crime and natural resource booms: Evidence from unconventional natural gas production. Annals of Regional Science, 61(1), 113–137.

53.

Lee

Clarke

(2019). Do low-skilled workers gain from high-tech employment growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain. Research Policy, 48(9), 103803.

54.

Lippmann

Davis

Aldrich

H. E.

(2005). Entrepreneurship and inequality. Research in the Sociology of Work, 15(1), 3–31.

55.

Mehlum

Moene

Torvik

(2006). Institutions and the resource curse. Economic Journal, 116(508), 1-20.

56.

Moretti

(2010). Local multipliers. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 100(2), 373–377.

57.

Moretti

Thulin

(2013). Local multipliers and human capital in the United States and Sweden. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 339–362.

58.

Nanda

Samila

Sorenson

(2020). The persistent effect of initial success: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 137(1), 231–248.

59.

Nieves

(2000). Many in Silicon Valley cannot afford housing, even at $50,000 a year. New York Times. p. 1001020.

60.

O’Mara

(2019). The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America. Penguin Press.

61.

Prijcker

D. S.

Manigart

Collewaert

Vanacker

(2019). Relocation to get venture capital: A resource dependence perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(4), 697–724.

62.

Ragozzino

Blevins

D. P.

(2016). Venture-backed firms: How does venture capital involvement affect their likelihood of going public or being acquired?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(5), 991–1016.

63.

Samila

Sorenson

(2011). Venture capital, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(5), 338–349.

64.

Saxenian

(1994). Regional Advantage. Harvard University Press.

65.

Schrodt

(2017). 12 companies with the most luxurious employee perks. Money.

66.

Sorenson

(2017). Regional ecologies of entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(5), 959–974.

67.

Sorenson

Audia

P. G.

(2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940-1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424-462.

68.

Sorenson

Stuart

T. E.

(2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588.

69.

Sorenson

Waguespack

D. M.

(2006). Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 560-589.

70.

Spigel

(2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.

71.

Staff (2019). Faded gold. The Economist.

72.

Stuart

T. E.

Sorenson

(2003). Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 175-201.

73.

van Dijk

J. J.

(2017). Local employment multipliers in U.S citiies. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(2), 465–487.

74.

van Nieuwerburgh

Veldkamp

(2009). Information immobility and the home bias puzzle. Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1187–1215.

75.

Verhoogen

E. A.

(2008). Trade, quality upgrading, and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 489–530.

76.

Welter

Baker

Audretsch

D. B.

Gartner

W. B.

(2017). “Everday entrepreneurship–A call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.