The current understanding of entrepreneurial action is grounded in time, but the different facets of this time remain to be sufficiently explored. We argue that entrepreneurial action has two temporal dimensions: world time and human time. World time reveals the prior contextual conditions giving rise to entrepreneurial actions that generate subsequent results. Human time reveals how entrepreneurs act on the basis of past experiences, attention to current conditions, and images of the future. Using a narrative framework to integrate world time and human time, we contribute to a deeper understanding of the different facets of time in entrepreneurial action.
BraudelF. (2009). History and the social sciences – the long Duree. Review, 32(2), 171–203.
6.
CunliffeA. L.LuhmanJ. T.BojeD. M. (2004). Narrative temporality: Implications for organizational research. Organization Studies, 25(2), 261–286.doi:10.1177/0170840604040038
7.
DavidssonP. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002
8.
DavidssonP.GruenhagenJ. H. (2020). Fulfilling the process promise: A review and agenda for new venture creation process research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 50(8), 104225872093099.doi:10.1177/1042258720930991
9.
DavidssonP.ReckerJ.von BrielF. (2020). External enablement of new venture creation: A framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 311–332.doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0163
10.
DimovD. (2020). Opportunities, language, and time. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 333–351.doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0135
11.
DimovD.PistruiJ. (2020). Recursive and discursive model of and for entrepreneurial action. European Management Review, 17(1), 267–277.doi:10.1111/emre.12360
12.
DimovD.SchaeferR.PistruiJ. (2020). Look who is talking … and who is listening: Finding an integrative ‘we’ voice in entrepreneurial scholarship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 3, 104225872091450.doi:10.1177/1042258720914507
DowningS. (2005). The social construction of entrepreneurship: Narrative and dramatic processes in the coproduction of organizations and identities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 185–204.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00076.x
15.
GanzinM.IslamG.SuddabyR. (2020). Spirituality and entrepreneurship: The role of magical thinking in future-oriented sensemaking. Organization Studies, 41(1), 77–102.doi:10.1177/0170840618819035
16.
GarudR.GiulianiA. P. (2013). A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 157–160.doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0055
17.
GarudR.SchildtH. A.LantT. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1479–1492.doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0915
18.
HjorthD. (2007). Lessons from Iago: Narrating the event of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 712–732.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.10.002
19.
JonesR.LathamJ.BettaM. (2008). Narrative construction of the social entrepreneurial identity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14(5), 330–345.doi:10.1108/13552550810897687
20.
KorsgaardS.BerglundH.ThraneC.BlenkerP. (2016). A tale of two Kirzners: Time, uncertainty, and the “nature” of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 867–889.doi:10.1111/etap.12151
21.
LévesqueM.StephanU. (2020). It’s time we talk about time in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 163–184.doi:10.1177/1042258719839711
22.
McMullenJ. S. (2015). Entrepreneurial judgment as empathic accuracy: A sequential decision-making approach to entrepreneurial action. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 651–681.doi:10.1017/S1744137413000386
23.
McMullenJ. S.DimovD. (2013). Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1481–1512.doi:10.1111/joms.12049
24.
McMullenJ. S.ShepherdD. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379628
O’ConnorE. (2002). Storied business: Typology, intertextuality, and traffic in entrepreneurial narrative. The Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 155–182.
32.
PackardM. D.ClarkB. B.KleinP. G. (2017). Uncertainty types and transitions in the entrepreneurial process. Organization Science, 28(5), 840–856.doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1143
33.
PenroseE. T. (1959/1995). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press.
RicœurP. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
36.
RicœurP. (1985). Time and narrative (Vol. 3). University of Chicago Press.
37.
SarasvathyS. D. (2021). Even-if: Sufficient, yet unnecessary conditions for worldmaking. Organization Theory, 2, 263178772110057.doi:10.1177/26317877211005785
38.
SchatzkiT. R. (2006). The time of activity. Continental Philosophy Review, 39(2), 155–182.doi:10.1007/s11007-006-9026-1
39.
ShepherdD. A.WennbergK.SuddabyR.WiklundJ. (2019). What are we explaining? A review and agenda on initiating, engaging, performing, and contextualizing entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 45(1), 159–196.doi:10.1177/0149206318799443
40.
ShepherdD. A.WilliamsT. (2020). Entrepreneurship responding to adversity: Equilibrating adverse events and disequilibrating persistent adversity. Organization Theory, 1(4), 263178772096767.doi:10.1177/2631787720967678
41.
SkoglundA.RedmalmD.BerglundK. (2020). Videography – studying ethical uncertainty in alternative entrepreneurship. Society and Business Review, 15(4), 305–324.doi:10.1108/SBR-06-2019-0087
42.
SteyaertC. (2007). Of course that is not the whole (toy) story: Entrepreneurship and the cat’s cradle. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 733–751.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.10.004
43.
TownsendD. M.HuntR. A.McMullenJ. S.SarasvathyS. D. (2018). Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 659–687.doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0109
44.
Van BurgE.CornelissenJ.StamW.JackS. (2020). Advancing qualitative entrepreneurship research: Leveraging methodological plurality for achieving scholarly impact. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 59(4), 104225872094305.doi:10.1177/1042258720943051
VogelP. (2017). From venture idea to venture opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 943–971.doi:10.1111/etap.12234
47.
WadhwaniR. D.KirschD.WelterF.GartnerW. B.JonesG. G. (2020). Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(1), 3–19.doi:10.1002/sej.1346
48.
WadhwaniR. D.LubinskiC. (2017). Reinventing entrepreneurial history. Business History Review, 91(4), 767–799.doi:10.1017/S0007680517001374
49.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
50.
WelterF.BakerT. (2020). Moving contexts onto new roads: Clues from other disciplines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 78(4), 104225872093099.doi:10.1177/1042258720930996
51.
WelterF.BakerT.AudretschD. B.GartnerW. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—A call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.doi:10.1111/etap.12258
52.
WiltbankR.DewN.ReadS.SarasvathyS. D. (2006). What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 981–998.doi:10.1002/smj.555
53.
WoodM. S.BakkerR. M.FisherG. (2021). Back to the future: A time-calibrated theory of entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 147–171.doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0060
