Since 2017, the structural dynamics that entrench rape culture, sexual harassment and exploitation have gained increased attention across the globe, particularly in regards to workplaces. This paper aims to review the current RANZCP guidelines and other literature pertaining to the ethics of sexual relationships between psychiatrists and trainees.
Conclusions
Such relationships involve significant power differentials, which may make them unethical on an individual level. A culture condoning such relationships may also disadvantage women in the workplace. The current RANZCP guidelines on relationships between supervisors and trainees may unfairly disadvantage trainees.
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Code of ethics. 5th ed.Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Institute of Teaching, 2018.
2.
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. 2021. Education training policy and procedure - supervision policy and procedure. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Institute of Teaching.
3.
RyanC. Sex, lies and training programs: the ethics of consensual sexual relationships between psychiatrists and trainee psychiatrists. Aust N Z J Psychiatry1999; 33(1): 119–120.
4.
SalvendyJT. Control and power in supervision. Int J Group Psychother1993; 43(3): 363–376.
5.
BohnsVKDeVincentLA. Rejecting unwanted romantic advances is more difficult than duitors realize. Soc Psychol Personal Sci2019; 10(8): 1102–1110.
6.
RotundoMNguyenDHSackettPR. A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. J Appl Psychol2001; 86(5): 914–922.
7.
Australian National University v Scott Morrison. FWCFB 83. Sydney, Australia: Australian National University, 2022.
8.
FredricksonBRobertsT. Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychol Women Q1997; 21(2): 173–206.
9.
MoradiBHuangY-P. Objectification theory and psychology of women: a decade of advances and future directions. Psychol Women Q2008; 32(4): 377–398.
10.
GervaisSJWienerRLAllenJ, et al.Do you see what I see? the consequences of objectification in work settings for experiencers and third party predictors. Analyses Soc Iss Public Pol2016; 16(1): 143–174.
11.
WinnLCorneliusR. Self-objectification and cognitive performance: a systematic review of the literature. Front Psychol2020; 11: 20.
12.
HeflickNAGoldenbergJLCooperDP, et al.From women to objects: appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. J Exp Soc Psychol2011; 47(3): 572–581.
