The sexual harassment of girls and women is a common occurrence that begins in early adolescence and continues into adulthood. Not only is experiencing sexual harassment common, but it is also widely accepted and tolerated. In the current article, we use the bioecological theory of sexual harassment of girls to explain why this may be. Specifically, we discuss that the perpetration and tolerance of sexual harassment is built on a foundation of gendered socialization, media consumption, peer interactions, and permissive school environments that encourages passivity and objectification in girls and aggressiveness and dominance in boys. We outline how this process begins in infancy and continues throughout development, ultimately fostering an environment in which the sexual harassment of girls and women flourishes. Important implications for preventing sexual harassment are also discussed.
AusterC. J.MansbachC. S. (2012). The gender marketing of toys: An analysis of color and type of toy on the Disney Store website. Sex Roles, 67, 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0177-8
2.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.x
3.
BridgesA. J.WosnitzerR.ScharrerE.SunC.LibermanR. (2010). Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: A content analysis update. Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1065–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210382866
4.
BrownC. S. (2019). Sexualized gender stereotypes predict girls’ academic self-efficacy and motivation across middle school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(6), 523–529.
5.
BrownC. S.BiefeldS. D.BulinJ. (2022). High school policies about sexual harassment: What’s on the books and what students think. Journal of Social Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12505
6.
BrownC. S.BiefeldS. D.ElpersN. (2020). A bioecological theory of sexual harassment of girls: Research synthesis and proposed model. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020954363
7.
ChaplinT. M.ColeP. M.Zahn-WaxlerC. (2005). Parental socialization of emotion expression: Gender differences and relations to child adjustment. Emotion, 5(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.80
8.
EdwardsK. M.RodenhizerK. A.EcksteinR. P. (2020). School personnel’s bystander action in situations of dating violence, sexual violence, and sexual harassment among high school teens: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(11–12), 2358–2369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517698821
GoldsteinS. E.MalanchukO.Davis-KeanP. E.EcclesJ. S. (2007). Risk factors of sexual harassment by peers: A longitudinal investigation of African American and European American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00523.x
11.
GreenV. A.RechisR. (2006). Children’s cooperative and competitive interactions in limited resource situations: A literature review. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.12.002
12.
HalimM. L.RubleD. N.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.ZosulsK. M.LuryeL. E.GreulichF. K. (2014). Pink frilly dresses and the avoidance of all things “girly”: Children’s appearance rigidity and cognitive theories of gender development. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034906
13.
HandJ. Z.SanchezL. (2000). Badgering or bantering? Gender differences in experience of, and reactions to, sexual harassment among US high school students. Gender & Society, 14(6), 718–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014006002
14.
HydeJ. S.BiglerR. S.JoelD.TateC. C.van AndersS. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74, 171–193.
15.
JewellJ.BrownC. S.PerryB. (2015). All my friends are doing it: Potentially offensive sexual behavior perpetration within adolescent social networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(3), 592–604.
16.
JewellJ. A.BrownC. S. (2014). Relations among gender typicality, peer relations, and mental health during early adolescence. Social Development, 23(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12042
17.
KahlenbergS. G.HeinM. M. (2010). Progression on Nickelodeon? Gender-role stereotypes in toy commercials. Sex Roles, 62(11–12), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9653-1
18.
KirschA. C.MurnenS. K. (2015). “Hot” girls and “cool dudes”: Examining the prevalence of the heterosexual script in American children’s television media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000017
19.
LeaperC. (2015). Gender and social-cognitive development. In LibenL. S.MüllerU.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 806–853). John Wiley.
LetendreJ. (2007). “Sugar and spice but not always nice”: Gender socialization and its impact on development and maintenance of aggression in adolescent girls. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-007-0088-7
22.
LichtyL. F.CampbellR. (2012). Targets and witnesses: Middle school students’ sexual harassment experiences. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(3), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610396090
23.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 431–446.
24.
MartinC. L.KornienkoO.SchaeferD. R.HanishL. D.FabesR. A.GobleP. (2013). The role of sex of peers and gender-typed activities in young children’s peer affiliative networks: A longitudinal analysis of selection and influence. Child Development, 84(3), 921–937.
25.
MartinC. L.RubleD. N. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x
26.
McDade-MontezE.WallanderJ.CameronL. (2017). Sexualization in U.S. Latina and White girls’ preferred children’s television programs. Sex Roles, 77(1–2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0692-0
27.
McKenneyS. J.BiglerR. S. (2016). Internalized sexualization and its relation to sexualized appearance, body surveillance, and body shame among early adolescent girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614556889
28.
McMasterL. E.ConnollyJ.PeplerD.CraigW. M. (2002). Peer to peer sexual harassment in early adolescence: A developmental perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 14(1), 91–105.
29.
MuehlenhardC. L.PetersonZ. D.HumphreysT. P.JozkowskiK. N. (2017). Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(4–5), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014
30.
MyersK. (2012). “Cowboy up!” Non-hegemonic representations of masculinity in children’s television programming. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 20(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.2002.125
31.
ParmleyM.CunninghamJ. G. (2008). Children’s gender–emotion stereotypes in the relationship of anger to sadness and fear. Sex Roles, 58(5), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9335-9
32.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2016). Adolescents and pornography: A review of 20 years of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.114344
ReigeluthC. S.AddisM. E. (2016). Adolescent boys’ experiences with policing of masculinity: Forms, functions, and consequences. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039342
35.
RinehartS. J.EspelageD. L. (2016). A multilevel analysis of school climate, homophobic name-calling, and sexual harassment victimization/perpetration among middle school youth. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039095
36.
RobertsT.-A.DanielsE. A.WeaverJ. M.ZanovitchL. S. (2022). “Intermission!” A short-term social media fast reduces self-objectification among pre-teen and teen dancers. Body Image, 43, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.08.015
37.
RohlfH.KrahéB.BuschingR. (2016). The socializing effect of classroom aggression on the development of aggression and social rejection: A two-wave multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 58, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.05.002
38.
StoneE. A.BrownC. S.JewellJ. A. (2015). The sexualized girl: A within-gender stereotype among elementary school children. Child Development, 86(5), 1604–1622. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12405
39.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2014). Contemporary girlhood: Maternal reports on sexualized behavior and appearance concern in 4–10 year-old girls. Body Image, 11, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.06.007
40.
WardL. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014068031532
WillisM.JozkowskiK. N.ReadJ. (2019). Sexual consent in K–12 sex education: An analysis of current health education standards in the United States. Sex Education, 19(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1510769
43.
XiaoS. X.HanishL. D.MaloufL. M.MartinC. L.LecheileB.GobleP.FabesR. A.DelayD.BryceC. I. (2022). Preschoolers’ interactions with other-gender peers promote prosocial behavior and reduce aggression: An examination of the Buddy Up intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60, 403–413.
