The formal assessment of a person’s capacity for making reasoned decisions is an infrequent and usually unappealing clinical task. The purpose of this paper is to dissect the task, consider the component parts, clarify those aspects that can be problematic and highlight those that remain so.
Method:
The paper reviews the concepts, terminologies and dilemmas around alcoholism, insight, lack of insight, denial, judgement, will, decisional capacity and competence.
Conclusion:
Assessments of patients suffering from alcoholism (or any other dyscontrol problem such as deliberate self-harm, problem gambling or eating disorders) are likely to evoke unease because of the interweaving of potentially disputable phenomenological, clinical, ethical, semantic and legal aspects. Familiarity with the concepts and terms around decisional capacity helps to orientate clinicians in their work. There remain some particular conceptual issues that are in need of further scholarly attention.
KaplanHISadockBJGrebbJA. Kaplan and Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry. 7th Ed.Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1994, p.308
6.
CookeMAPetersERKuipersE. Disease, deficit or denial? Models of poor insight in psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand2005; 112: 4–17.
7.
HazeltonLDSternsGLChisholmT. Decision-making capacity and alcohol abuse: clinical and ethical considerations in personal care choices. Gen Hosp Psychiatr2003; 25: 130–135.
BenthamPHodgesJ. Psychiatric and clinical cognitive assessment. In: JacobyROppenheimerC (eds) Psychiatry in the elderly. 3rd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, p.218.
SearightHRMontoothA. Changes in decision making capacity during illness: a review and case report with implications. Arch Psychiatr Psychother2008; 4: 47–55.
14.
National Ethics Committee of the Veterans Health Administration. Ten myths about decision-making capacity: a report by the National Ethics Committee of the Veterans Health Administration. National Center for Ethics in Health Care Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs USA. http://www.ethics.va.gov/docs/necrpts/nec_report_20020201_ten_myths_about_dmc.pdf (2002, accessed 7 March 2013).
AppelbaumPS. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New Engl J Med2007; 357: 1834–1840.
17.
JesteDVSaksE. Decisional capacity in mental illness and substance use disorders: empirical database and policy implications. Behav Sci Law2006; 24: 607–628.
