Meaning in life and meaning in work are increasingly recognized as relevant for gifted individuals’ careers, even if they remain underexplored in the literature. This article presents a scoping review examining studies on meaning in life and/or work among gifted populations across multiple databases. Fourteen studies were included from 854 records, encompassing both quantitative and qualitative studies. This scoping review mapped the theoretical frameworks used, identified how giftedness was operationalized, examined methodological approaches, highlighted key themes and gaps in existing literature about meaning in life and meaning in work among gifted individuals. The findings provide perspectives for better understanding meaning in life and meaning in work in gifted populations, also offering research directions for career development studying sustainable talents.
ArkseyH.O'malleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
2.
*ArmstrongL. L.DessonS.St. JohnE.WattE. (2018). The DREAM program: Developing resilience through emotions, attitudes, & meaning (gifted edition)–a second wave positive psychology approach. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 32(3-4), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2018.1559798
Cohen-ScaliV.Drabik-PodgórnaV.PodgórnyM.DuarteM. E.GuichardJ.AisensonG.Di FabioA.MareeK.MasdonatiJ.NotaL.PouyaudJ.RibeiroM.A.San Antonio (2025). New perspectives for life-design interventions in the anthropocene context. Australian Journal of Career Development, 34(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241307964
5.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RobinsonR. E. (1986). Culture, time, and the development of talent. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264–284). Cambridge University Press.
6.
De VosA.Van der HeijdenB.AkkermansJ. (2020). Sustainable careers: Toward a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 103–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.011
7.
Di FabioA. (2014). The new purposeful identitarian awareness for the twenty-first century: Valorize themselves in the life construction from youth to adulthood and late adulthood. In Di FabioA.BernaudJ.-L. (Eds.), The construction of the identity in 21st century: A festschrift for jean guichard (pp. 157–168). Nova Science Publishers.
8.
Di FabioA. (2017a). Positive healthy organizations: Promoting well-being, meaningfulness, and sustainability in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01938
9.
Di FabioA. (2017b). The psychology of sustainability and sustainable development for well-being in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01534
10.
Di FabioA. (2022). Introduction. Well-being and sustainability in organizations through the flourishing of talents. In Di FabioA. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on well-being and sustainability in organizations (pp. xvii–xxv). Springer.
11.
Di FabioA.BlusteinD. L. (2016). Editorial. In Di FabioA.BlusteinD. L. (Eds.), Ebook research topic “from meaning of working to meaningful lives: The challenges of expanding decent work” in frontiers in psychology. Organizational Psychology, vol. 7, 1119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01119
12.
Di FabioA.CheungF.PeiróJ.-M. (2020). Editorial Special Issue Personality and individual differences and healthy organizations. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110196
13.
Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.). (2023). Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003212157
14.
*Di FabioA.ImbimboE.SvicherA. (2024). A latent profile analysis in Italian workers: Crucial ingredients of career construction counseling for enhancing gifted and talented learners?Gifted Education International, 40(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241268296
15.
Di FabioA.MareeJ. G. (2016). A psychological perspective on the future of work: promoting sustainable projects and meaning-making through grounded reflexivity. Counseling. International Journal of Research and Intervention, 9(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.14605/CS931619
16.
Di FabioA.PeiróJ. M. (2018). Human capital sustainability leadership to promote sustainable development and healthy organizations: A new scale. Sustainability, 10(7), 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072413
17.
Di FabioA.PeiróJ. M. (2023). Human capital sustainability leadership and healthy organizations: Its contribution to sustainable development. In Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations (pp. 93–103). Routledge Taylor & Francis.
18.
Di FabioA.RosenM. A. (2018). Opening the Black Box of Psychological Processes in the Science of Sustainable Development: A New Frontier. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejosdr/3933
19.
Di FabioA.RosenM. A. (2020). An exploratory study of a new psychological instrument for evaluating sustainability: The sustainable development goals psychological inventory. Sustainability MDPI, 12(18), 7617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187617
20.
Di FabioA.TsudaA. (2018). The psychology of harmony and harmonization: Advancing the perspectives for the psychology of sustainability and sustainable development. Sustainability, 10(12), 4726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124726
21.
*DikayaL. A.RyzhovaV. S. (2024). Meaning-in-life orientations and characteristics of communication and motivation of students studying at gifted education centers. Russian Psychological Journal, 21(1), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2024.1.7
22.
DixsonD. D.JansenL.GentzisE. A.WorrellF. C. (2024). Gifted profiles of hope: Being hopeful is associated with a talent development psychosocial profile in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 35(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2023.2206114
23.
DominickP. G.GabrielA. S. (2009). Two sides to the story: An interactionist perspective on identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(4), 430–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01168.x
24.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
25.
FeldmanD. H. (1986). Giftedness as a developmentalist sees it. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 285–305). Cambridge University Press.
GuichardJ. (2013). Forms of reflexivity and transformations of systems of subjective identity forms during life designing dialogues. Lecture presented at the SIO International Conference—Life Designing and career counseling: Building hope and resilience, Padova, Italy.
28.
GuichardJ. (2022). How to support the design of active lives that meet the challenges of the twenty-first century (economy, ecology and politics)?Australian Journal of Career Development, 31(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162221090815
29.
HartungP.Di FabioA. (2024). Sustainable development: A fourth paradigm for 21st century careers. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241287739
30.
HoughL. M.OswaldF. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future-remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 631–664. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.631
31.
LevacD.ColquhounH.O'brienK. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
32.
*MareeJ. G. (2019). Self-and career construction counseling for a gifted young woman in search of meaning and purpose. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 19(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9377-2
33.
MareeJ. G. (2024a). Exploring innovative career counselling strategies for universal relevance and sustainability in the anthropocene era. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241236418
34.
*MareeJ. G. (2024b). In search of career-life meaning: Enhancing the existential experience of a gifted learner. Gifted Education International, 40(3), 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241254914
35.
MeyersM. C.Van WoerkomM.DriesN. (2013). Talent-Innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.003
36.
NijsS.Gallardo-GallardoE.DriesN.SelsL. (2014). A multidisciplinary review into the definition, operationalization, and measurement of talent. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.002
37.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (2025a). Introduction to teachable components of talent development in academic domains. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(2), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862241309909
38.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C.AssoulineS. G.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (2024). Extending research on psychosocial skills and appropriate instruction in developing talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(4), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532241281566
39.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C.AssoulineS. G.StoegerH.ZieglerA. (2025b). International research perspectives on talent: Part 2. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 48(4), 331–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532251372948
40.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C.ThomsonD. (2022). Talent development as a framework for the delivery of services to gifted children. In Introduction to gifted education (pp. 267–286). Routledge.
41.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
42.
PeiróJ. M.KozusznikM.MolinaI. R.TorderaN. (2019). The happy-productive worker model and beyond: Patterns of wellbeing and performance at work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030479
43.
PeiróJ. M.MontesaD.SorianoA.KozusznikM. W.VillajosE.MagdalenoJ.DjourovaN. P.AyalaY. (2021). Revisiting the happy-productive worker thesis from a eudaimonic perspective: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(6), 3174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063174
44.
PetersM. D.GodfreyC. M.KhalilH.McInerneyP.ParkerD.SoaresC. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
45.
PetersM. D.MarnieC.TriccoA. C.PollockD.MunnZ.AlexanderL.KhalilH. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
46.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
47.
*PoirierJ.Brault-LabbéA.BrassardA. (2025). Living with the gift of giftedness: An exploratory study on the well-being of intellectually gifted adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862251347293
48.
*PolletE.SchnellT. (2017). Brilliant: But what for? Meaning and subjective well-being in the lives of intellectually gifted and academically high-achieving adults. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 18(5), 1459–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9783-4
49.
Rodríguez-FernándezM. I.SternbergR. J. (2024). The search for meaning in the life of the gifted. Gifted Education International, 40(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294231189923
50.
RosenM. A.Di FabioA. (2023). Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations: Empirical evidence from environment to safety to innovation and future research. In Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations (pp. 20–41). Routledge Taylor & Francis.
SakU. (2021). The fuzzy conception of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 371–392). Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_21
53.
SakU. (2023). Identification and education of students with gifts and talents based on the fuzzy conception of giftedness. Education Sciences, 13(6), 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060562
54.
SavickasM. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In BrownS.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42–70). Wiley.
55.
SavickasM. L.NotaL.RossierJ.DauwalderJ.-P.DuarteM. E.GuichardJ.Van VianenA. E. M. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21th century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004
56.
SchnellT. (2009). The sources of meaning and meaning in life questionnaire (SoMe): Relations to demographics and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271074
57.
SchnellT.HögeT.PolletE. (2013). Predicting meaning in work: Theory, data, implications. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830763
58.
StegerM. F.DikB. J.DuffyR. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
59.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.CorwithS.CalvertE.WorrellF. C. (2023). Transforming gifted education in schools: Practical applications of a comprehensive framework for developing academic talent. Education Sciences, 13(7), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070707
60.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2022). Channeling gifted abilities into transformative creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD.KaramiS. (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of transformational giftedness for education (pp. 373–385). Springer International Publishing.
61.
TakeuchiK.OsamuS.LahotiS.GondorD. (2017). Growing up: 10 years of publishing sustainability science research. Sustainability Science, 12, 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0484-7
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O'BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
64.
*van CasterenP. A.MeermanJ.BrouwersE. P.van DamA.van der KlinkJ. J. (2021). How can wellbeing at work and sustainable employability of gifted workers be enhanced? A qualitative study from a capability approach perspective. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 392. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10413-8
65.
Van der HeijdenB. I. J. M.De VosA. (2015). Sustainable careers: Introductory chapter. In De VosA.Van Der HeijdenB. I. J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable careers (pp. 1–19). Edward Elgar Publishing.
66.
*VötterB. (2020). Crisis of meaning and subjective well-being: The mediating role of resilience and self-control among gifted adults. Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010015
67.
*VötterB.SchnellT. (2019a). Cross-lagged analyses between life meaning, self-compassion, and subjective well-being among gifted adults. Mindfulness, 10(7), 1294–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1078-x
68.
*VötterB.SchnellT. (2019b). Bringing giftedness to bear: Generativity, meaningfulness, and self-control as resources for a happy life among gifted adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01972
69.
WorrellF. C.BayazitliI.SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2025). Investigating the insider knowledge of STEM-talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 48(4), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532251371739
70.
*YuenM.ChanR. T.ZhangJ.FungE.ChanS. (2023a). Assessing meaning in life for gifted learners: Validation of a Chinese version of meaning in life in children questionnaire. Gifted and Talented International, 38(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2022.2150589
71.
*Yuen, M., Tsz-Hong Chan, R., Wong, S. W., Yau, J., Zhang, J., Ho, E. Y. F., Fung, E., Chan, S., & Wu, F. (2023b). Appropriateness of the dispositional hope scale (DHS) and meaning in life questionnaire: Short form (MLQ-SF) for use with regular and gifted students in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 34(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2022.2159336
