Structural inequalities and stereotypes are held out as explanations for gender differences in reported levels of confidence. However, while it is reported that in the absence of stereotypes women and men should possess identical levels of self-confidence, no study to date has tested this hypothesis. Single sex schools were identified as an environment where structural bias might be mitigated. From a survey of 9,414 Australian adolescents aged 13–17 years attending single sex high schools, no significant difference in overall self-efficacy was identified between genders. Overall, by age cohort there was no significant difference between boys’ and girls’ self-efficacy, with a minor exception of the 15 years cohort. Self-efficacy levels were linked to participation in team sport and undertaking leadership roles. The study provides the first large scale study that demonstrates that women are no less confident than men under conditions where gendered structures are mitigated by their environment.
BacchiniD.MagliuloF. (2003).
Self-image and perceived self-efficacy during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
32(5), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024969914672
BanduraA. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In BanduraA. (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1–44).
Cambridge University Press.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
W.H. Freeman and Company.
7.
BetzN. E.HackettG. (1981).
The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
28(5), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.5.399
BleidornW.ArslanR. C.DenissenJ. J.RentfrowP. J.GebauerJ. E.PotterJ. (2016).
Age and gender differences in self-esteem—A cross-cultural window.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
111(3), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000078
10.
BordaloP.CoffmanK.GennaiioliN.ShleiferA. (2019).
Beliefs about gender. American Economic Review,
109(3), 739–773. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170007
BroadleyK. (2015).
Entrenched gendered pathways in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Engaging girls through collaborative career development. Australian Journal of Career Development,
24(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416214559548
13.
Byars-Winston, A., Diestelmann, J., Savoy, J. N., & Hoyt, W. T. (2017). Unique effects and moderators of effects of sources on self-efficacy: A model-based meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(6), 645–658.
14.
CarliL. L. (2004). Gender effects on persuasiveness and compliance gaining: A review. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Perspectives on persuasion, social influence and compliance gaining (pp. 133–148). Allyn and Bacon.
15.
CarliL. L.AlawaL.LeeY.ZhaoB.KimE. (2016).
Stereotypes about gender and science: Women≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
40(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645
16.
CaseyM.HarveyJ.TelfordA.EimeR.MooneyA.PayneW. (2016).
Patterns of time use among regional and rural adolescent girls: Associations with correlates of physical activity and health related quality of life.Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,
19(11), 931–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.02.004
17.
CookP.FrankR. (1993). The growing concentration of top students at elite schools. In ClotfelterC.RothschildM. (Eds.), Studies of supply and demand in higher education (pp. 121–144).
University of Chicago Press.
18.
DasM.DoM.ChanE. (2014).
The effect of distributing tailored careers e-newsletters on students’ early career-related confidence: A pilot study. Australian Journal of Career Development,
23(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416214528480
19.
EaglyA. H., & CarliL. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders.
Harvard Business School Press.
20.
EaglyA. H.NaterC.MillerD. I.KaufmannM.SczesnyS. (2020).
Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.American Psychologist,
75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
21.
Gorrell, J. & Shaw, E. (1988). Upper Elementary and High School Students’ Attitudes toward Gender-Typed Occupations. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3(2), 189–199.
22.
GottfredsonL. S. (1981).
Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations.Journal of Counseling Psychology,
28, 545–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545
23.
GottfredsonL. S. (2002). Gottfredson's theory of circumscription, compromise, and self creation. In BrownD. & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development(4th ed., pp. 85–148).
Jossey-Bass.
24.
GuillenL.MayoM.KarelaiaN. (2018).
Appearing self-confident and getting credit for it: Why it may be easier for men than women to gain influence at work. Human Resource Management,
57, 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21857
25.
HackettG. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In BanduraA. (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 232–258).
Cambridge University Press.
26.
HackettG.BetzN.E. (1981).
A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
18, 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1
27.
HydeJ. S. (2005).
The gender similarities hypothesis.American Psychologist,
60(6), 581.
28.
HydeJ. S.BiglerR. S.JoelD.TateC. C.van AndersS. M. (2019).
The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist,
74(2), 171.
29.
HymowitzK. (2013).
Think again: Working women. Foreign Policy,
201, 59–64.
30.
JacksonD. A.EdgarS. (2019).
Encouraging students to draw on work experiences when articulating achievements and capabilities to enhance employability. Australian Journal of Career Development,
28(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416218790571
31.
JudgeT. A.ErezA.BonoJ. E.ThoresenC. J. (2002).
Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
83(3), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.693
32.
Miller-TiedemanA. L.TiedemanD. V. (1990). Career decision making: Individualistic perspective. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Assoc. (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd ed., pp. 308–337).
Jossey.
33.
NixdorffJ.RosenT. (2010).
The glass ceiling women face: An examination and proposals for development of future women entrepreneurs. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship,
13(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-13-02-2010-B006
34.
OrbachR. (2017).
Bringing talent off the bench and into the game: The underrepresentation of women in the boardroom. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law,
22(2), 202–256.
35.
PahlkeE.HydeJ. S.AllisonC. M. (2014).
The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,
140(4), 1042.
PropstD.KoeserR. (2008).
Bandura goes outdoors: Role of self-efficacy in the outdoor leadership development process. Leisure Sciences,
20(3), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409809512289
38.
RichE. (2004).
Exploring teacher’s biographies and perceptions of girl’s participation in physical education. European Physical Education Review,
10(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X04044073
RobinsR.TrzesniewskiK. H.TracyJ.GoslingS.PotterJ. (2002).
Global self-esteem across the life span. Psychology and Aging,
17(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.423
41.
RussellK.WalshM. (2011).
An exploratory study of a wilderness adventure program for young offenders. Journal of Experiential Education,
33(4), 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382591003300415
42.
SandbergJ. (2000).
Understanding human competence at work: An interpretive approach. Academy of Management Journal,43(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556383
43.
SandbergS. (2014). Lean in: Women, work and the desire to lead.
Alfred A. Knopf.
44.
Santos-PintoL. (2012).
Labor market signalling and self-confidence: Wage compression and the gender pay gap. Journal of Labor Economics,
30(4), 873–914. https://doi.org/10.1086/666646
45.
ScholzU.DonaB.SudS.SchwarzerR. (2002).
Is general self-efficacy a universal construct?European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
18(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242
46.
ShekD.MaC.LiuT. (2015).
Adolescent development assets and service leadership. International Journal of Human Development,
14(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0408
47.
ShererM.MadduxJ. E.MercandanteB.Prentice-DunnS.JacobsB.RogersR. W. (1982).
The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports,
51(2), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
48.
SheuH.LentR.MillerM.PennL.CusickM.TruongN. (2018).
Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations in science, technology, engineering and mathematics domains: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
109, 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.003
49.
SturmR.TaylorS.AtwaterL.BraddyP. (2014).
Leader self-awareness: An examination and implications of women’s under-prediction. Journal of Organisational Behavior,
35, 657–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1915
50.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S.UllmanJ. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5).
Pearson.
51.
UsherE.PajaresF. (2008).
Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research,
78(4), 741–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
52.
van DintherM.DochyS.SegersM. (2011).
Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review,
6(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
53.
WilsonF.KickulJ.MarlinoD. (2007).
Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,
31(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x
