Executive rewards in Australia have continued to climb in the face of calls and attempts to curb their growth. Despite the proliferation of codes of best corporate governance practice and the introduction of legislation in the 1990s requiring companies to disclose executive salaries, remuneration committees did not play a major role in slowing the growth of executive pay. This article reports the results of an empirical study of committee members. It explores issues in the formulation of executive pay from a committee perspective. The study found that requirements for disclosure did little to ensure modest packages were awarded. Indeed, disclosure requirements were often cited as one of the causes of pay escalation.
ACSI.2002. Corporate governance policy options for trustees. Melbourne: Australian Council of Superannuation Investors.
2.
ASX Corporate Governance Council.2007. Corporate governance principles and recommendations. 2nd edn. Sydney : Australian Securities Exchange.
3.
Australian.2002. Woolies boss gets $1.5m pay rise. 2 October: 23.
4.
Australian Stock Exchange.2004. 2004 Australian share ownership study. Sydney: Australian Stock Exchange.
5.
Bender, Ruth.2004. why do companies use performance-related pay for their executive directors?Corporate Governance: An International Review12(4): 521-33.
6.
Bender, Ruth, and Lance Moir.2006. Does `best practice' in setting executive pay in the UK encourage `good' behaviour? Journal of Business Ethics67(1): 75-91.
7.
Bosch, Henry.1995. The director at risk: Accountability in the boardroom . South Melbourne: Pitman Publishing .
8.
Byrd, John W., Marilyn F. Johnson, and Susan L. Porter .1998. Discretion in financial reporting: The voluntary disclosure of compensation peer groups in proxy statement performance graphs. Contemporary Accounting Research15(1): 25-52.
9.
Carson, Elizabeth.2002. Factors associated with the development of board sub-committees . Corporate Governance: An International Review10(1): 4-18.
10.
Chenoweth, Neil, and Damon Kitney.2000. The perplexities of putting a price on performance. Australian Financial Review, 16 November: S3.
11.
Clarke, Robert N., Martin J Conyon, and Simon I Peck .1998. Corporate governance and directors' remuneration: Views from the top. Business Strategy Review9(4): 21-30.
12.
Clements, Ken, Ray da Silva Rosa, and Darrick Lieu.2004. Australia's participation in the global market for CEOs. Working paper. University of Western Australia Business School.
13.
Cutting, B., and A. Kouzmin.2002. Evaluating corporate board cultures and decision making. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance2(2): 27-45.
14.
Daily, Catherine M., Jonathan L. Johnson, Alan E. Ellstrand, and Dan R. Dalton .1998. Compensation committee composition as a determinant of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal41(2): 209-20.
15.
Efrat, Zilla, and Alan Deans.2008. Avoiding thumbs down. Company Director, February, 22-7.
16.
Evans, Robert, and John Evans.2001. The influence of non-executive director control and rewards on CEO remuneration: Australian evidence. Working paper. Graduate School of Business, Curtin University of Technology , WA.
17.
Hilmer, Frederick G.1993. Strictly boardroom: Improving governance to enhance company performance. Melbourne: The Business Library.
18.
Holland, Peter J., Peter J. Dowling, and Peter A. Innes .2001. CEO compensation in Australia: Is there a relationship between principles, policies and practices?Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources39(3): 41-58.
19.
Kiel, Geoffrey C., and Gavin J. Nicholson .2003. Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance11(3): 189-205.
20.
Leblanc, R., and Mark S. Schwartz .2007. The black box of board process: Gaining access to a difficult subject. Corporate Governance15(5): 843-51.
21.
Main, Brian G.M.1993. Pay in the boardroom: Practices and procedures . Personnel Review22(7): 3-14.
22.
Main, Brian G.M., and James Johnston.1993. Remuneration committees and corporate governance. Accounting and Business Research23(91A): 351-62.
23.
Nicholas, Katrina, and Brendan Swift.2007. Coming and going, shareholders cop it . Australian Financial Review, 13 November: S7.
24.
Nicholson, Gavin J., Malcolm Alexander, and Geoffrey C. Kiel .2004. Defining the social capital of the board of directors: An exploratory study. Journal of the Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management10(1): 54-72.
25.
O'Neill, Graham L.1995a. Framework for developing a total reward strategy . Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources33(2): 103-17.
26.
O'Neill, Graham L.1995b. Linking pay to performance: Conflicting views and conflicting evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources33(2): 20-35.
27.
O'Neill, Graham L.1999. Executive remuneration in Australia: An overview of trends and issues. Melbourne: The Hay Group .
28.
O'Neill, Graham L., and A. Berry.2002. Remuneration of Australian executives: A practitioner review. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources40(2): 228-45.
29.
O'Neill, Graham L., and Mark Iob.1999. Determinants of executive remuneration in Australian organizations: An exploratory study. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources37(1): 65-75.
30.
Park, Yun W., Toni Nelson, and Mark R. Huson .2001. Executive pay and the disclosure environment: Canadian evidence. Journal of Financial Research24(3): 347-65.
31.
Peetz, David.1999. Nearly the year of living dangerously: In the emerging worlds of Australian industrial relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources37(2): 3-23.
32.
Ramsay, Ian M., ed. 1997. Corporate governance and the duties of company directors. Melbourne : University of Melbourne, Centre for Corporate Law & Securities Regulation.
Sheng, Andrew.2000. Transparency, accountability and standards in global markets . In OECD second Asian roundtable on corporate governance . Hong Kong: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
35.
Shields, John, Michael O'Donnell, and John O'Brien .2003. The bucks stop here: Private sector executive remuneration in Australia. Sydney: Labor Council of New South Wales.
36.
Spira, Laura F., and Ruth Bender.2004. Compare and contrast: Perspectives on board committees. Corporate Governance12(4): 489-99.
37.
Stapledon, Geof.1996. Institutional shareholders and corporate governance . New York: Clarendon Press.
38.
Stapledon, Geof.2001. Huge CEO pay bonuses are widespread. Canberra Times, 7 June: 9.
39.
Stapledon, Geof.2002. Boards, audit fees and CEO patterns. Paper read at Corporate Governance and Trustees - Putting Principles into Practice, Melbourne.
40.
Stapledon, Geof, and John Fickling.2001. Board composition and pay in the top 100 companies. Paper read at Conference of Major Superannuation Funds Conference, March, Gold Coast, Queensland.
41.
Stapledon, Geof, and Jeffrey Lawrence .1996. Corporate governance in the top 100: An empirical study of the top 100 companies' boards of directors . Parkville, Vic.: Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, University of Melbourne.
42.
Tassell, Tony.2003. Taking an active interest. Financial Times , 14 November 2003. news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1066565891364&p=1059479525589 (accessed 17 November 2005).
43.
Thompson, Steve.2005. The impact of corporate governance reforms on the remuneration of executives in the UK. Corporate Governance13(1): 19-25.
44.
Tomasic, Roman, and Stephen Bottomley .1993. Directing the top 500: corporate governance and accountability in Australian companies. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
