Deciding on the boundaries of a firm as it expands abroad is a critical decision for managers. Despite the rapid growth in research addressing this issue, many questions remain unanswered. In this article, the authors review the international entry mode choice literature, identify weaknesses and shortcomings, and provide suggestions on how researchers can add to the knowledge of mode choice and help managers make better international boundary decisions.
Agarwal, S.1994. Socio-cultural distance and the choice of joint ventures: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Marketing , 2(2): 63-80.
2.
Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S.N.1992. Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location, and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 1-27.
3.
Ahmed, Z.U., Mohamad, O., Tan, B., & Johnson, J.P.2002. International risk perceptions and mode of entry: A case study of Malaysian multinational firms. Journal of Business Research, 55: 805-813.
4.
Anand, J., & Delios, A.1997. Location specificity and the transferability of downstream assets to foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(3): 579-603.
5.
Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H.1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17: 1-26.
6.
Arens, P., & Brouthers, K.D.2001. Key stakeholder theory and state owned versus privatized firms. Management International Review,41(4): 377-394.
7.
Arora, A., & Fosfuri, A.2000. Wholly owned subsidiary versus technology licensing in the worldwide chemical industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 555-572.
8.
Arrow, K.1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention . In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: 609-625. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
9.
Aulakh, P.S., & Kotabe, M.1997. Antecedents and performance implications of channel integration in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies , 28(1): 145-175.
10.
Barkema, H.G., Bell, J.H.J., & Pennings, J.M.1996. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151-166.
11.
Barkema, H.G., & Vermeulen, F.1997. What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures?Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4): 845-864.
12.
Barney, J.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
13.
Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T.M.1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488-505.
14.
Bhaumik, S.K., & Gelb, S.2005. Determinants of entry mode choice of MNCs in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(2): 5-24.
15.
Brouthers, K.D.1995. The influence of international risk on entry mode strategy in the computer software industry. Management International Review,35(1): 7-28.
16.
Brouthers, K.D.2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 203-221.
17.
Brouthers, K.D., & Bamossy, G.J.2006. Post-formation processes in Eastern and Western European joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2): 203-229.
18.
Brouthers, K.D., & Brouthers, L.E.2000. Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 89-97.
19.
Brouthers, K.D., & Brouthers, L.E.2001. Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies , 32(1): 177-189.
20.
Brouthers, K.D., & Brouthers, L.E.2003. Why service and manufacturing entry mode choices differ: The influence of transaction cost factors, risk and trust. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5): 1179-1204.
21.
Brouthers, K.D., Brouthers, L.E., & Werner, S.1996. Dunning's eclectic theory and the smaller firm: The impact of ownership and locational advantages on the choice of entry mode in the computer software industry. International Business Review , 5(4): 377-394.
22.
Brouthers, K.D., Brouthers, L.E., & Werner, S.2000. Influences on strategic decision making in the Dutch financial services industry. Journal of Management, 26: 863-883.
23.
Brouthers, K.D., Brouthers, L.E., & Werner, S.2002. Industrial sector, perceived environmental uncertainty and entry mode strategy. Journal of Business Research, 55(6): 495-507.
Brouthers, K.D., & Nakos, G.2004. SME international entry mode choice and performance: A transaction cost perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28(3): 229-247.
26.
Brouthers, L.E., Brouthers, K.D., & Werner, S.1999. Is Dunning's eclectic framework descriptive or normative?Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4): 831-844.
27.
Brouthers, L.E., Brouthers, K.D., & Werner, S.2000. Perceived environmental uncertainty, entry mode choice and satisfaction with EC-MNC performance. British Journal of Management, 11: 183-195.
28.
Burgel, O., & Murray, G.C.2000. The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. Journal of International Marketing , 8: 33-62.
29.
Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A., & Sanders, W.G.2004. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements and consequences of top management team components. Journal of Management, 30(6): 749-778.
30.
Chan, P.S.1995. International joint ventures vs. wholly owned subsidiaries . Multinational Business Review, 3: 37-44.
31.
Chen, H., & Hu, M.Y.2002. An analysis of determinants of entry mode and its impact on performance. International Business Review, 11: 193-210.
32.
Chen, S.S., & Hennart, J.F.2002. Japanese investors' choice of joint ventures versus wholly-owned subsidiaries in the US: The role of market barriers and firm capabilities . Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1): 1-18.
33.
Chiles, T.H., & McMackin, J.F.1996. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 73-99.
34.
Cho, K.R., & Padmanabhan, P.2001. The relative importance of old and new decision specific experience in foreign ownership strategies: An exploratory study. International Business Review, 10: 645-659.
35.
Cho, K.R., & Padmanabhan, P.2005. Revisiting the role of cultural distance in MNC's foreign ownership mode choice: The moderating effect of experience attributes. International Business Review, 14: 307-324.
36.
Claver, E., & Quer, D.2005. Choice of market entry mode in China: The influence of firm-specific factors. Journal of General Management, 30(3): 51-70.
37.
Cloninger, P.A.2004. The effect of service intangibility on revenue from foreign markets. Journal ofInternational Management, 10: 125-146.
38.
Contractor, F.J., & Kundu, S.K.1998. Modal choice in a world of alliances: Analyzing organizational forms in the international hotel sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 29: 325-358.
39.
Das, T.K., & Teng, B.H.1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 491-512.
40.
Davidson, W.H., & McFetridge, D.G.1984. International technology transaction and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 32: 253-264.
41.
Davis, P.S., Desai, A.B., & Francis, J.D.2000. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective . Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2): 239-258.
42.
Dean, J.W., & Sharfman, M.P.1996. Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 368-396.
43.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P.W.1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 915-933.
44.
Delios, A., & Henisz, W.J.2000. Japanese firms' investment strategies in emerging economies . Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 305-323.
45.
Dev, C.S., Erramilli, M.K., & Agarwal, S.2002. Brands across borders: Determining factors in choosing franchising or management contracts for entering international markets. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43: 91-104.
46.
Dollinger, M.J., Golden, P.A., & Saxton, T.1997. The effect of reputation on the decision to joint venture . Strategic Management Journal, 18(2): 127-140.
47.
Domke-Damonte, D.2000. Interactive effects of international strategic and throughput technology on entry mode for service firms. Management International Review,40(1): 41-59.
48.
Dunning, J.H.1993. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
49.
Ekeledo, I., & Sivakumar, K.2004. International market entry mode strategies of manufacturing firms and service firms: A resource-based perspective. International Marketing Review, 21(1): 68-101.
50.
Elango, B., & Sambharya, R.B.2004. The influence of industry structure in the entry mode choice of overseas entrants in manufacturing industries. Journal ofInternational Management, 10: 107-124.
51.
Erramilli, M.K.1991. The experience factor in foreign market entry behavior of service firms, Journal of International Business Studies , 22(3): 479-501.
52.
Erramilli, M.K.1996. Nationality and subsidiary ownership patterns in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2): 225-248.
53.
Erramilli, M.K., Agarwal, S., & Dev, C.S.2002. Choice between non-equity entry modes: An organizational capability perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 223-242.
54.
Erramilli, M.K., Agarwal, S., & Kim, S.S.1997. Are firm-specific advantages location specific too?Journal of International Business Studies, 28: 735-757.
55.
Erramilli, M.K., & D'Souza, D.E.1993. Venturing into foreign markets: The case of small service firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 17: 29-41.
56.
Erramilli, M.K., & Rao, C.P.1990. Choice of foreign market entry modes by service firms: Role of market knowledge. Management International Review,30(2): 135-150.
57.
Erramilli, M.K., & Rao, C.P.1993. Service firms' international entry-mode choice: A modified transaction-cost analysis approach. Journal of Marketing,57: 19-38.
58.
Fan, J.2000. Price uncertainty and vertical integration: an examination of petrochemical firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6: 345-376.
59.
Feldman, D.C., Bearden, W.O., & Hardesty, D.M.2006. Varying the content of job advertisements: The effects of message specificity. Journal of Advertising, 35(1): 123-142.
60.
Fincham, R.1992. Perspectives on power: Processual, institutional and “internal” forms of organizational power. Journal of Management Studies , 29(6): 741-759.
61.
Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Jacque, L.L.1995. Control modes in international service operations: The propensity to franchise. Management Science, 41(7): 1238-1249.
62.
Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E.1988. The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation . Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4: 305-336.
63.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., & Kumar, N.2006. Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis . Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 519-543.
64.
Gil, A., Nakos, G., Brouthers, L.E., & Brouthers, K.D.2006. Country-specific strategy and new venture formation in Central and East Europe. International Business Review, 15: 1-13.
65.
Glaister, K.W., & Buckley, P.J.1996. Strategic motives for international alliance formation . Journal of Management Studies, 33(3): 301-332.
66.
Gomes-Casseres, B.1989. Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 11: 1-25.
67.
Gomes-Casseres, B.1990. Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1): 1-22.
68.
Gronhaug, K., & Kvitastein, O.1993. Distributional involvement in international strategic business units. International Business Review, 2(1): 1-14.
69.
Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A.1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193-206.
70.
Hennart, J.F.1982. A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
71.
Hennart, J.F.1988a. A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 361-374.
72.
Hennart, J.F.1988b. Upstream vertical integration in the world aluminum and tin industries: A comparative study of the choice between market and intrafirm coordination. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 9: 281-300.
73.
Hennart, J.F.1989. Can the “new forms of investment” substitute for the “old forms?” A transaction costs perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 20: 211-234.
74.
Hennart, J.F.1991. The transaction cost theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37(4): 483-497.
75.
Hennart, J.F.2000. The transaction cost theory of the multinational enterprise . In C. Pitelis & R. Sugden (Eds.), The nature of the transnational firm (2nd ed.): 81-116. London: Routledge.
76.
Hennart, J.F., & Larimo, J.1998. The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions?Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 515-538.
77.
Hennart, J.F., & Park, Y.R.1993. Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39(9): 1054-1070.
78.
Hennart, J.F., & Park, Y.R.1994. Location, governance and strategic determinants of Japanese manufacturing investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 419-436.
79.
Hennart, J.F., & Reddy, S.1997. The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: The case of Japanese investors in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 1-12.
80.
Hennart, J.F., & Zeng, M.2002. Cross-cultural differences and joint venture longevity . Journal of International Business Studies, 33(4): 699-716.
81.
Herrmann, P., & Datta, D.K.2006. CEO experiences: Effects on the choice of FDI entry mode . Journal of Management Studies, 43(4): 755-778.
82.
Hill, C.W.L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W.C.1990. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal11: 117-128.
Hofstede, G.1980. Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
85.
Huber, G.P., & Power, D.J.1985. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal , 6: 171-180.
86.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8: 23-32.
87.
Kim, W.C., & Hwang, P.1992. Global strategy and multinationals' entry mode choice . Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 29-54.
88.
Kirkman, B.L., Lowe, K.B., & Gibson, C.B.2006. A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 285-320.
89.
Klein, S., Frazier, G.L., & Roth, V.J.1990. A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 27: 196-208.
90.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H.1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 18: 411-432.
91.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U.1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625-645.
92.
Lu, J.W.2002. Intra- and inter-organizational imitative behavior: Institutional influences on Japanese firms' entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 19-37.
93.
Luo, Y.2001. Determinants of entry in an emerging economy: a multilevel approach. Journal of Management Studies, 38(3): 443-472.
94.
Luo, Y.2002. Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market: Implications for multinational enterprises. Organization Science , 13(1): 48-63.
95.
Madhok, A.1997. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 39-61.
96.
Makino, S., & Neupert, K.E.2000. National culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 705-713.
97.
Meyer, K.E.2001. Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies , 32(2): 357-367.
98.
Meyer, K.E., & Nguyen, H.V.2005. Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 63-93.
99.
Mutinelli, M., & Piscitello, L.1998. The entry mode choice of MNEs: An evolutionary approach. ResearchPolicy, 27: 491-506.
100.
Nakos, G., & Brouthers, K.D.2002. Entry mode choice of SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27: 47-63.
101.
Nitsch, D., Beamish, P.W., & Makino, S.1996. Entry mode and performance of Japanese FDI in Western Europe. Management International Review,36(1): 27-43.
102.
North, D.C.1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
103.
O'Grady, S., & Lane, H.W.1996. The psychic distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2): 309-333.
104.
Okoroafo, S.C.1989. Effects of repatriations risk on the choice of entry modes used by US manufacturing forms in LDCs. Journal of Global Marketing, 3(2): 25-41.
105.
Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K.R.1996. Ownership strategy for a foreign affiliate: An empirical investigation of Japanese firms. Management International Review,36: 45-65.
106.
Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K.R.1999. Decision specific experience in foreign ownership and establishment strategies: Evidence from Japanese firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1): 25-43.
107.
Palenzuela, V.A., & Bobillo, A.M.1999. Transaction costs and bargaining power: Entry mode choice in foreign markets. Multinational Business Review, 62-75.
108.
Pan, Y.1996. Influences on foreign equity ownership level in joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies , 26: 1-26.
109.
Pan, Y.2002. Equity ownership in international joint ventures: The impact of source country factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 375-384.
110.
Pan, Y., & Chi, P.S.K.1999. Financial performance and survival of multinational corporations in China. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 359-374.
111.
Pan, Y., Li, S., & Tse, D.K.1999. The impact of order and mode of market entry on profitability and market share. Journal of International Business Studies , 30(1): 81-103.
112.
Pan, Y., & Tse, D.K.1996. Cooperative strategies between foreign firms in an overseas country. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5): 929-946.
113.
Pedersen, T., Petersen, B., & Benito, G.R.G.2002. Change of foreign operation method: Impetus and switching costs. International Business Review, 11: 325-345.
114.
Rajan, K.S., & Pangarkar, N.2000. Mode of entry choice: An empirical study of Singaporean multinationals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17: 49-66.
115.
Roth, K.1992. Implementing international strategy at the business unit level: The role of managerial decision-making characteristics. Journal of Management, 18(4): 769-789.
116.
Scott, W.R.1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
117.
Shane, S.1993. The effect of cultural differences in perceptions of transaction costs on national differences in the preference for international joint ventures . Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 10(1): 57-69.
118.
Shane, S.1994. The effect of national culture on the choice between licensing and direct foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal , 15: 627-642.
119.
Shaver, J.M.1998. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival?Management Science , 44(4): 571-585.
120.
Shi, Y.S., Ho, P.Y., & Siu, W.S.2001. Market entry-mode selection: The experience of small Hong-Kong firms investing in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 8: 19-41.
121.
Shrader, R.C.2001. Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: The case of young high-technology manufacturing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 45-60.
122.
Simon, D.G., & Lane, P.J.2004. A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4): 306-319.
123.
Sitkin, S.B., & Pablo, A.L.1992. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1): 9-38.
124.
Slangen, A., & Hennart, J.F.2006. Do greenfields outperform acquisitions or vice versa? The role of subsidiary integration. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Atlanta, GA .
125.
Somlev, I.P., & Hoshino, Y.2005. Influence of location factors on establishment and ownership of foreign investments: The case of the Japanese manufacturing firms in Europe . International Business Review, 14: 577-598.
126.
Stopford, J.M., & Wells, L.T.1972. Managing the multinational enterprise/organization of the firm and ownership of the subsidiaries. New York: Basic Books.
127.
Stuckey, J.1983. Vertical integration and joint ventures in the aluminum industry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
128.
Tan, B., Erramilli, M.K., & Liang, T.W.2001. The influence of dissemination risks, strategic control and global management skills on firms' modal decision in host countries. International Business Review, 10: 323-340.
129.
Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K.W.1998. Determinants of foreign direct investment in Turkey. Thunderbird International Business Review , 40(3): 279-314.
130.
Tatoglu, E., Glaister, K.W., & Erdul, F.2003. Determinants of foreign ownership in Turkish manufacturing . Eastern European Economics, 41(2): 5-41.
131.
Taylor, C.R., Zou, S., & Osland, G.E.1998. A transaction cost perspective on foreign market entry strategies of US and Japanese firms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(4): 389-412.
132.
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D., & Russell, C.J.2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 270-283.
133.
Tsai, M.T., & Cheng, Y.M.2002. The decision criteria for the ownership control entry mode for Taiwanese manufacturing firms in the United States: An application of the logit model and AHP. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 12(2): 45-71.
134.
Tsang, W.K.2000. Transaction cost and resource-based explanations of joint ventures: A comparison and synthesis. Organization Studies , 21(1):215-242.
135.
Tse, D.K., Lee, K., Vertinsky, I., & Wehrung, D.A.1988. Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives' choice, decisiveness, and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing,52: 81-95.
136.
Uhlenbruck, K., Rodriguez, P., Doh, J., & Eden, L.2006. The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(3): 402-414.
137.
Williamson, O.E.1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
138.
Woodcock, C.P., Beamish, P.W., & Makino, S.1994. Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 253-273.
139.
Wright, P., Ferris, S.P., Sarin, A., & Awasthi, V.1996. Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 441-463.
140.
Yiu, D., & Makino, S.2002. The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6): 667-683.
141.
Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T.2004. Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6): 524-544.
