This study explores the impact of the 1994 reform on the Italian Supreme Audit Institution, which operates within a Napoleonic administrative tradition. Inspired by New Public Management principles, the reform is analysed through a historical lens to assess its effects on the Supreme Audit Institution's role. A thematic analysis of the Supreme Audit Institution's declarations, plans, and reports before and after the reform revealed that the changes were largely cosmetic. Utilising the theory of organised hypocrisy, this study finds that, while the Supreme Audit Institution outwardly embraced reform, its core operations remained aligned with its traditional role as a watchdog of public spending. This research contributes to the historical understanding of public sector reforms within contexts characterised by a strong legal code tradition and highlights the need for further exploration of the effectiveness of reforms in similar administrative settings.
Italian Constitutional Court. (27 January 1995) Sentence No. 29.
3.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (27 August 1992) Doc. LXIX-bis No. 1 – Vol. I and Vol II.
4.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (27 February 1992) Doc. LXIX No. 1.
5.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (25 May 1993) Doc. LXIX-bis, No. 1 – BIS.
6.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (3 August 1993) Doc. LXIX-bis No. 2 – Vol. I and Vol II.
7.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (4 August 1993) Doc. LXIX No. 2.
8.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (8 January 1994) Doc. LXIX-bis, No. 2 – BIS.
9.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (2 February 1994) Doc. LXIX-bis, No. 2 – TER.
10.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (1 August 1994) Doc. XLVI No. 1.
11.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (1 August 1994) Doc. XLVI-bis, No. 1 – Vol. I, II/1, II/2.
12.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (31 July 1995) Doc. XLVI No. 2.
13.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (31 July 1995) Doc. XLVI-bis, No. 2 – Vol. I, II/1, II/2.
14.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (29 May 1996) Doc. XLVI-bis – No. 1 Vol. I and Vol II.
15.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (26 July 1996) Doc, XLVI No. 1.
16.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (21 July 1997) Doc. XLVI-bis – No. 2 Vol. I, II, III.
17.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (23 July 1997) Doc. XLVI No. 2.
18.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (16 July 1998) Doc. XLVI-bis – No. 3 Vol. I and Vol II.
19.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (22 July 1998) Doc. XLVI No. 3.
20.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (20 July 1999) Doc. XLVI No. 4.
21.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (20 July 1999) Doc. XLVI-bis – No. 4.
22.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (8 August 2000) Doc. XLVI No. 5.
23.
Italian Parliamentary Act. (8 August 2000) Doc. XLVI-bis – No. 5.
24.
Italian SAI. (4 May 1990.) Opinion of the united chambers for audit, no. 279.
25.
Italian Senate Constitutional Affair Commission. (15 April 1997) Stenographic Report, Session 18.
26.
Italian Senate Constitutional Affair Commission. (17 April 1997) Stenographic Report, Session 21.
27.
Italian Senate Constitutional Affair Commission. (26 May 1993) Stenographic Report, Session 163.
28.
Italian Senate Constitutional Affair Commission. (10 November 1993) Stenographic Report, Session 238.
29.
Italian Senate of the Republic. (23 July 1993) Stenographic Report, Session 201.
30.
Italian State annual report for the year 1992. (1992).
31.
Secondary Sources
32.
Anessi PessinaESteccoliniI (2005) Evolutions and limits of new public management-inspired budgeting practices in Italian local governments. Public Budgeting & Finance25(2): 1–14.
33.
BakerCR (2014) A comparative analysis of the development of the auditing profession in the United Kingdom and France. Accounting History19(1–2): 97–114.
34.
BallHR (1978) The watchdog of Parliament: The centenary of the legislative audit. Canadian Public Administration21(4): 584–617.
35.
BarcaLTrentoS (1994) L’economia della corruzione. Bari: Laterza.
36.
BarzelayM (1996) Performance auditing and new public management: Changing roles and strategies of central audit institutions. In: OECD – Performance Audit and the Modernisation of Government. Paris: PUMA/OECD, 22–54.
37.
BarzelayM (1997) Central audit institutions and performance auditing: A comparative analysis of organisational strategies in the OECD. Governance10(3): 235–260.
38.
BassaniniF (2000) Overview of administrative reform and implementation in Italy: Organisation, personnel, procedures and delivery of public services. International Journal of Public Administration23(2–3): 229–252.
39.
Benzerafa-AlilatMTandilashviliNFrisciaM (2021) New development: Diversification of the Cour de comptes’ activities – a necessary modernization or an identity evolution?Public Money & Management41(6): 491–493.
40.
BismanJE (2011) Cite and seek: Exploring accounting history through citation analysis of the specialist accounting history journals, 1996–2008. Accounting History16(2): 161–183.
41.
BlumeLVoigtS (2011) Does organisational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment. European Journal of Political Economy27: 215–229.
42.
BournJ (2007) Public Sector Auditing: Is It Value for Money. London: John Wiley & Sons.
43.
BowenGA (2008) Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research Journal8(1): 137–152.
44.
BowenGA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal9(2): 27–40.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
47.
BroadbentJLaughlinR (2003) Control and legitimation in government accountability processes: The private finance initiative in the UK. Critical Perspectives on Accounting14(1–2): 23–48.
48.
BrunssonN (1986) Organising for inconsistencies: On organisational conflict, depression and hypocrisy as substitutes for action. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies 2(3-4): 165–185.
49.
BrunssonN (1989) The Organisation of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organisations. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
50.
BrunssonN (1993a) Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society18(6): 489–506.
51.
BrunssonN (1993b) The necessary hypocrisy. The International Executive35(1): 1–9.
52.
BrunssonN (2007) The Consequences of Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
BullMRhodesM (1997) Between crisis and transition: Italian politics in the 1990s. West European Politics20(1): 1–13.
54.
BunnMGilchristDJ (2013) A few good men: Public sector audit in the Swan River Colony 1828–1835. Accounting History18(2): 193–209.
55.
BunnMPilcherRGilchristDJ (2018) Public sector audit history in Britain and Australia. Financial Accountability & Management34(1): 64–76.
56.
CarboneG (1998) La Corte dei Conti. In: ViolanteL (ed) Storia d’Italia. Legge, Diritto, Giustizia. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore, 847–880.
57.
CarringtonT (2017) Consulting or holding to account? The Swedish National Audit Office as an agent of change in public administration. Statsventenskaplig Tidskrift119(1): 91–109.
58.
CassandroPE (1975) Le gestioni erogatrici pubbliche. Torino: Utet.
59.
CasseseS (1993) Dal controllo sul processo al controllo sul prodotto. In: Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri. Dipartimento per la funzione pubblica (eds) Il nuovo sistema di controllo interno nelle pubbliche amministrazioni. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, 51–61.
60.
CasseseS (1995) I moscerini e gli avvoltoi. Sistema dei controlli e riforma della Costituzione. In: AA.VV – Sistema dei controlli e riforma della Costituzione. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato, 21–57.
61.
ChandlerRAEdwardsJRAndersonM (1993) Changing perceptions of the role of the company auditor 1840–1940. Accounting and Business Research23(92): 443–459.
62.
ChoCHLaineMRobertsRW, et al. (2015) Organised hypocrisy, organisational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organisations and Society40: 78–94.
63.
ChristensenLTMorsingMThyssenO (2020) Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research114: 327–335.
64.
CogliandroG (2000) Reform: The audit system. International Journal of Public Administration23(2–3): 383–403.
65.
ColazingariSRose-AckermanS (1998) Corruption in a paternalistic democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America. Academy of Political Science113(3): 447–470.
66.
ColquhounP (2013) Political and organisational legitimacy of public sector auditing in New Zealand local government. Accounting History18(4): 473–489.
67.
CoombsHMEdwardsJR (1990) The evolution of the district audit. Financial Accountability & Management6(3): 153–176.
68.
CorderyCJHayDC (2021) Public Sector Audit. New York: Routledge.
69.
CraftsNMagnaniM (2013) The golden age and the second globalisation in Italy. In: TonioloG (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Italian Economy Since Unification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–107.
70.
CrainzG (2015) Italy’s political system since 1989. Journal of Modern Italian Studies20(2): 176–188.
71.
D’AuriaG (2010) I controlli e la Corte dei Conti alla fine del primo decennio del XXI secolo. Rivista della Corte dei Conti5: 214–236.
72.
DewarDFunnellW (2016) A History of British National Audit: The Pursuit of Accountability. London: Oxford University Press.
EnglishLMGuthrieJBroadbentJ, et al. (2010) Performance audit of the operational stage of long-term partnership for the private sector provision of public services. Australian Accounting Review20(1): 64–75.
75.
FasoneC (2013) Corte dei Conti v. Ufficio parlamentare di bilancio?Torunskie Studia Polsko-Wloskie9: 171–200.
76.
FunnellW (1994) Independence and the state auditor in Britain: A constitutional keystone of a case of Reified Imagery?Abacus30(2): 175–195.
77.
FunnellW (1997) Military influences on the evolution of public sector audit and accounting 1830–1880. Accounting History2(2): 9–28.
78.
FunnellW (1998) Executive coercion and state audit: A processual analysis of the responses of the Australian audit office to the dilemmas of efficiency audit 1978–84. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal11(4): 436–458.
79.
FunnellW (2004) Victorian parsimony and the early champions of modern public sector audit. Accounting History9(1): 25–60.
80.
GendronYCooperDJTownleyB (2001) In the name of accountability. State auditing, independence and new public management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal14(3): 278–310.
81.
Gentiloni SilveriU (2015) Italy’s unfinished transition: Between domestic dynamics and international change. Journal of Modern Italian Studies20(2): 189–201.
82.
GiglioliPP (1996) Political corruption and the media: The Tangentopoli Affair. International Social Science Journal48(3): 381–394.
83.
GlynnJJ (1985) Value for money auditing. An international review and comparison. Financial Accountability & Management1(2): 113–128.
84.
GreenDSingletonJ (2009) The Watchdog: New Zealand’s Audit Office 1840 to 2008. Dunedin: Otago University Press.
85.
GuccioneV (1993) Controlli ex ante e controlli ex post nella normativa pubblica. In: CasseseS (ed) I controlli della Pubblica Amministrazione. Bologna: Il Mulino, 23–36.
86.
GuthrieJ (1989) The contested nature of performance auditing in Australia. International Journal of Public Sector Management2(3): 56–66.
87.
GuthrieJJohansonUBukhPN, et al. (2003) Intangibles and the transparent enterprise: New strands of knowledge. Journal of Intellectual Capital3(4): 429–440.
88.
GuthrieJParkerL (1999) A quarter of a century of performance auditing in the Australian federal public sector: A malleable masque. Abacus35(3): 302–332.
89.
HayDCorderyC (2018) The value of public sector audit: Literature and history. Journal of Accounting Literature40: 1–15.
90.
HoodC (1991) A public management for all seasons?Public Administration69(1): 3–19.
91.
HoodC (1995) The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society20(2/3): 93–109.
92.
INTOSAI (2009) Lima Declaration. Vienna: INTOSAI General Secretariat.
Italian Department of Treasury (1992) Libro verde sulle partecipazioni dello Stato. Roma: Poligrafico dello Stato.
95.
JacobsK (1998) Value for money audit in New Zealand: Competing for control in the public sector. British Accounting Review30(4): 343–360.
96.
JohnsenAReichborn-KjennerudKCarringtonT, et al. (2019) Supreme audit institutions in a high-impact context: A comparative analysis of performance audit in four Nordic countries. Financial Accountability & Management35(2): 158–181.
97.
JonesMJ (2009) Origins of medieval exchequer accounting. Accounting Business & Financial History19(3): 259–285.
98.
JonesMJ (2010) Source of power and infrastructural conditions in medieval governmental accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society35(1): 81–94.
99.
KnillCSteinebachYFernandez-i-MarinX (2020) Hypocrisy as a crisis response? Assessing changes in talk, decisions, and actions of the European Commission in EU environmental policy. Public Administration98: 363–377.
100.
KuckartzU (2014) Qualitative Text Analysis. London: Sage, London.
101.
LaguecirALecaB (2022) Organized decoupling of management control systems: An exploratory study of traders’ unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics181: 153–169.
102.
LapsleyI (2009) New public management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit?Abacus45(1): 1–21.
103.
LiguoriMSteccoliniIRotaS (2018) Studying administrative reforms through textual analysis: The case of Italian central government accounting. International Review of Administrative Sciences84(2): 308–333.
104.
LingT (2003) Ex ante evaluation and the changing public audit function: The scenario planning approach. Evaluation9(4): 437–452.
105.
LipsonM (2007) Peacekeeping: Organised hypocrisy?European Journal of International Relations13(1): 5–34.
106.
LiyanarachchiGA (2009) Accounting in ancient Sri Lanka: Some evidence of the accounting and auditing practices of Buddhist monasteries during 815–1017 AD. Accounting History14(1–2): 101–120.
107.
MäättäMRantalaK (2007) The evaluator as a critical interpreter: Comparing evaluations of multi-actor drug prevention policy. Evaluation13(4): 457–476C.
108.
MaierER (2021) Measuring entertainment production at the Canadian Television Fund. Accounting History26(1): 61–79.
109.
MarounWUsherKMansoorH (2018) Biodiversity reporting and organised hypocrisy. The case of South African food and retail industry. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management15(4): 437–464.
110.
Martin-SardesaiAGuthrieJTooleyS, et al. (2019) History of research performance measurement systems in the Australian higher education sector. Accounting History24(1): 40–61.
111.
MatteiGGrossiGGuthrieJ (2021) Exploring past, present, and future trends in public sector auditing research: A literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research29(7): 94–134.
112.
MonfardiniPVon MaravicP (2012) Municipal auditing in Germany and Italy: Explosion, change or recalcitrance?Financial Accountability & Management28(1): 52–76.
113.
MorecraftSECoffmanENJensenDL (2000) T Coleman Andrews: Crusader for accountability in government. Accounting, Business & Financial History10(2): 245–258.
114.
MorinD (2003) Controllers or catalysts for change and improvement: Would the real value for money auditors please stand up?Management Auditing Journal18(1): 19–30.
115.
MorinD (2010) Welcome to the court…. International Review of Administrative Science76(1): 25–46.
116.
MorinD (2011) Serving as magistrate at the French Cour des comptes. Navigating between tradition and modernity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal24(6): 718–750.
117.
MorinD (2016) Democratic accountability during performance audits under pressure: A recipe for institutional hypocrisy?Financial Accountability & Management32(1): 104–124.
118.
MorinDHazguiM (2016) We are much more than watchdogs: The dual identity of auditors at the UK National Audit Office. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change12(4): 568–589.
119.
MussariR (1997) Autonomy, responsibility, and new public management in Italy. In: JonesLRSchedlerK (eds) International Perspectives on the New Public Management. London: JAI Press, 175–190.
120.
NelkenD (1996) The judges and political corruption in Italy. Journal of Law and Society23(1): 95–112.
121.
NickellEBRobertsRW (2014) Organisational legitimacy, conflict, and hypocrisy: An alternative view of the role of internal auditing. Critical Perspectives on Accounting25(3): 217–221.
122.
O’DwyerB (2004) Qualitative data analysis: Illuminating a process for transforming a ‘messy’ but ‘attractive’ ‘nuisance’. In: HumphreyCLeeB (eds) The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research. Oxford: Elsevier, 391–407.
123.
OngaroEValottiG (2008) Public management reform in Italy: Explaining the implantation gap. International Journal of Public Sector Management21(2): 174–204.
124.
OrelliRLPadovaniEKatsikasE (2016) NPM reform in Napoleonic countries: A comparative study of management accounting innovations in Greek and Italian municipalities. International Journal of Public Administration39(10): 778–789.
PetersBG (1997) Policy transfers between governments: The case of administrative reforms. West European Politics20(4): 71–88.
127.
PetersBG (2008) The Napoleonic tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management21(2): 118–132.
128.
PollittC (2003) Performance audit in Western Europe: Trends and choices. Critical Perspectives on Accounting14(1–2): 157–170.
129.
PollittCBouckaertG (2004) Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.
130.
PollittCGirreXLonsdaleJ, et al. (1999) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries. London: Oxford University Press.
131.
PollittCSummaH (1997) Reflexive watchdogs? How supreme audit institutions account for themselves. Public Administration75(2): 313–336.
132.
PosnerPLShananA (2014) Audit institutions. In: BovensMGoodinRESchillemansT (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. London: Oxford University Press, 488–506.
133.
PowerM (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. London: Oxford University Press.
134.
ProdiRDi GiovanniD (1990) Forty-five years of industrial policy in Italy: Protagonists, objectives, and instruments. In: BaldassariM (eds) Industrial Policy in Italy, 1945–90. London: Macmillan Press, 31–58.
135.
RocherSChristensenMRoyY (2021) ‘This looks like a job for an accountant! (with good funeral insurance)’: The changing roles of accountants in superhero comics from 1938 to 2018. Accounting History26(1): 9–34.
136.
ScobieHMMortaliSPersaudS, et al. (1996) The Italian Economy in the 1990s. London: Routledge.
137.
SharmaN (2007) Interactions and interrogations: Negotiating and performing value for money reports. Financial Accountability & Management23(3): 289–311.
138.
SilvestriA (2020) Too much to account for. The Crown of Aragon and the collapse of the auditing system in late-medieval Sicily. Accounting History Review30(2): 171–206.
139.
SkaerbaekP (2009) Public sector auditor identities in making efficiency auditable: The National Audit Office of Denmark as independent auditor and moderniser. Accounting, Organisations and Society34(8): 971–987.
140.
Snelson-PowellACGrosvoldJMillingtonA (2020) Organisational hypocrisy in business schools with sustainability commitments: The drivers of talk-action inconsistency. Journal of Business Research114: 408–420.
141.
SonnerfeldtALoftA (2018) The changing face of ethics – developing a code of ethics for professional accountants from 1977 to 2006. Accounting History23(4): 521–540.
142.
StapenhurstFLangsethP (1997) The role of the public administration in fighting corruption. International Journal of Public Sector Management10(5): 311–330.
143.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
144.
SuzukiY (2004) Basic structure of government auditing by a supreme audit institution. Government Auditing Review11: 39–53.
145.
UcheCKhalidS (2023) The effect of organised hypocrisy: Compensation committees and fair compensation in the Ghanaian mining industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting95(September): 102509.
146.
Van AckerWBouckaertG (2018) The impact of supreme audit institutions and ombudsmen in Belgium and The Netherlands. Financial Accountability & Management35(4): 1–17.
147.
VannucciA (2009) The controversial legacy of ‘Mani Pulite’: A critical analysis of Italian corruption and anti-corruption policies. Bulletin of Italian Politics1(2): 233–264.
148.
VianaLCMoreiraJAAlvesP (2022) State audit of public-private partnerships: Effects on transparency, auditor’s roles, and impact on auditee’s reactions. Financial Accountability & Management38: 633–660.
149.
WallaceWARichJSolomonI, et al. (1992) Whose power prevails in disclosure practices?Auditing11(Suppl.): 79–105.
150.
WaughJ (1998) Evading parliamentary control of government spending: Some early case studies. Public Law Review9(March): 28–42.
151.
WestphalenLG (2014) Evaluating the prosecutorial mandate of the supreme audit institution of Peru. International Journal of Public Administration37(7): 436–443.
152.
WilkinsPPhillimoreJGilchristD (2017) Collaboration by the public sector: Findings by watchdogs in Australia and New Zealand. Public Money & Management37(3): 217–224.
153.
WoodsD (1998) The crisis (collapse) of Italy’s public enterprise system: A revised property rights perspective. Journal of Modern Italian Studies3(1): 22–41.
